The long and turbulent legal journey of separatist leader Nnamdi Kanu has reached another defining moment, as a Federal High Court in Abuja convicted him on seven terrorism and treason-related charges and issued four concurrent life sentences.
The ruling has intensified national debate, especially as critics including legal experts and rights groups challenge the fairness of the proceedings, citing concerns such as alleged denial of fair hearing, reliance on a repealed law, and unresolved constitutional objections.
These controversies have raised deeper questions about consistency and credibility within Nigeria’s justice system. The contrast between Kanu’s multiple life sentences and the comparatively lighter punishment given to an ISWAP mastermind has further fueled public concern about proportionality and fairness.
Discover more from LN247
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

