US President Donald Trump has so far offered little public opposition to Israel’s latest offensive in Gaza, even as other world leaders express growing concern over the escalating conflict.
When questioned about Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s statement suggesting a possible full occupation of Gaza, Trump responded that it was “pretty much up to Israel” avoiding a direct stance and instead referencing past US airstrikes on Iran.
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee echoed this detached approach, saying it’s not America’s role to tell Israel what to do, though he added Trump might advise if asked.
Inside Israel, Netanyahu’s plan faces internal pushback. Army Chief of Staff Lt Gen Eyal Zamir reportedly opposes a full occupation. After a recent cabinet meeting, Israeli officials announced preparations to seize Gaza City, but stopped short of confirming plans for a complete takeover.
While some argue Netanyahu has always aimed for this outcome, others highlight his comments that Israel doesn’t intend to govern Gaza permanently, hinting at potential Arab administration—though no clear plan has been shared.
Historically, the US took a more assertive role in shaping Israeli policy. Early in his presidency, Trump proposed that the US could lead Gaza’s reconstruction or even relocate Palestinians. His administration also pressured Israel during past conflicts to respect ceasefires and limit attacks in Syria.
Recent ceasefire talks led by Steve Witkoff collapsed, with Trump blaming Hamas for refusing to negotiate seriously, saying the group seemed to “want to die.”
Analysts believe Trump’s current silence may be a tactic to pressure Hamas or a return to his non-interventionist stance following earlier military actions this year.
Meanwhile, longtime US allies like France, the UK, and Canada have shown growing support for recognizing Palestinian statehood, a move widely seen as encouraging Israel to de-escalate.
Washington’s muted response, however, appears to be giving Netanyahu space to proceed—potentially taking the conflict down a path that could become difficult to reverse.
Discover more from LN247
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
