Home Blog Page 154

US Lawmakers Propose Sanctions On Kwankwaso

0

U.S. Republican lawmakers have introduced legislation recommending targeted sanctions against former Kano State Governor and New Nigeria Peoples Party leader, Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, over alleged religious freedom violations in Nigeria.

The proposed legislation, titled the Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026 (H.R. 7457), was introduced on February 11 by Rep. Riley Moore (R-WV) and co-sponsored by Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), alongside senior Republican figures including House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast and House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole.

The bill builds on President Donald Trump’s redesignation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern for religious freedom issues.

The move has sparked sharp reactions in Nigeria, where Kwankwaso’s supporters describe the proposal as selective, politically motivated, and inconsistent with his record in public office.

What Are The Alleged Violations?

The bill links Kwankwaso’s inclusion to his tenure as Kano State governor from 1999 to 2003, during which the state adopted Sharia criminal law, joining several other northern states at the time.

Rep. Moore has publicly accused Kwankwaso of complicity in religious intolerance, particularly referencing Kano’s blasphemy laws that prescribe severe penalties, including death.

In a November 2025 post on X responding to Kwankwaso’s criticism of Nigeria’s CPC designation, Moore alleged that Kwankwaso “instituted Sharia law” and signed legislation making blasphemy punishable by death.

The bill highlights blasphemy laws as emblematic of religious persecution, citing high-profile cases such as the 2022 mob killing of Christian student Deborah Yakubu in Sokoto and the sentencing of Sufi musician Yahaya Sharif-Aminu in Kano.

It also references disputed estimates from the International Society for Civil Liberties and Rule of Law claiming that between 50,000 and 125,000 Christians were killed in Nigeria between 2009 and 2025. However, investigations by international media outlets have questioned the transparency and methodology behind those figures.

Beyond Kwankwaso, the bill names the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria, Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, and Fulani-ethnic nomad militias as responsible for severe violations of religious freedom.

It further calls for the designation of Fulani militias as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, citing alleged organized attacks on civilians, particularly Christians in Nigeria’s Middle Belt.

What Sanctions Are Being Proposed?

The legislation recommends targeted sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act against individuals and groups accused of severe violations of religious freedom.

The proposed sanctions include:
•Visa bans preventing entry into the United States
•Asset freezes targeting any financial holdings linked to the U.S.

In addition, the bill mandates annual reports from the U.S. Secretary of State assessing Nigeria’s compliance with the International Religious Freedom Act. These reports would evaluate:
•The Nigerian government’s efforts to prevent persecution and prosecute attackers
•Steps taken to repeal or reform blasphemy laws
•Protection for vulnerable communities
•Support for internally displaced persons
•Whether U.S. security assistance risks enabling religious persecution

The legislation also calls for recommendations on further punitive measures against alleged perpetrators.

Kwankwaso’s Record And Response

Contemporary accounts from the early 2000s suggest that Kwankwaso did not aggressively champion Sharia’s adoption.

Reports indicate that the Kano Sharia bill was introduced as a private member’s initiative and that he faced intense public and clerical pressure before signing it into law.

At its formal launch in June 2000, Kwankwaso reportedly cautioned against vigilantism and emphasized that only the state had the authority to enforce the law.

“Only the state government has the right to punish offenders. We should avoid taking the law into our hands. We should not intimidate those who are not Muslims.”

His administration’s measured approach reportedly strained relations with hardline clerics and contributed to his electoral defeat in 2003.

Supporters argue that he later maintained cordial relations with Christian leaders, ran for president in 2023 with a Christian bishop as his running mate, and played a role in curbing Boko Haram activities in Kano during his governorship.

The Kwankwasiyya movement and NNPP have rejected the U.S. proposal, describing it as a “witch-hunt” and questioning why Kwankwaso was singled out among several northern governors who oversaw Sharia adoption. They also point to U.S. alliances with countries that operate under Sharia-based systems.

Some analysts suggest the move may be linked to Kwankwaso’s vocal criticism of the CPC designation, in which he argued that Nigeria’s security crisis is complex and should not be framed solely through a religious lens.

Outlook And Broader Context

Nigeria’s security landscape remains deeply complex. The country faces Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province insurgencies in the northeast, banditry in the northwest, farmer-herder conflicts in the Middle Belt, and separatist unrest in the southeast.

While religious identity often overlaps with these conflicts, many analysts emphasize ethnic, economic, and criminal dimensions as equally significant drivers.

The bill remains at the introduction stage in Congress. Historically, many Nigeria-focused congressional proposals do not advance to full passage. Even if approved, implementation would require executive action under the U.S. administration.

For Kwankwaso, the controversy could carry political implications at home. In northern Nigeria, where skepticism of foreign interference resonates strongly, the sanctions proposal may bolster his standing among supporters who view him as defending national sovereignty.

The episode highlights ongoing tensions in U.S.-Nigeria relations, particularly over how best to address religious freedom concerns while navigating Nigeria’s broader security and political realities.

Government Declares Implementation Of Tax-Free Academic Allowance

0

The Federal Government has announced the commencement of the tax-free Consolidated Academic Tools Allowance, CATA, as part of the renegotiated 2025 agreement with the Academic Staff Union of Universities.

The move is tied to a 40 percent review of academic allowances aimed at improving lecturers’ welfare after 16 years without a major upward adjustment.

In early February 2026, the Minister of Education, Dr Tunji Alausa, directed vice-chancellors of federal universities to begin immediate implementation of the new structure, which took effect from January 1, 2026.

The National Salaries, Incomes and Wages Commission was said to have issued the necessary circular, with provisions captured in the ongoing 2026 budget process.

Under the revised structure, academic remuneration is now split into two components. The Consolidated University Academic Staff Salary, CONUASS, remains the taxable base salary.

The newly introduced CATA is a separate, job-specific, tax-exempt allowance designed to cover research materials, books, software, fieldwork, conferences and other scholarly tools.

Annual CATA payments range from slightly above ₦1 million for graduate assistants and assistant lecturers to over ₦3 million, reaching approximately ₦3.79 million in some reports for professors. The government has described the allowance as a targeted intervention to boost morale, curb brain drain and strengthen industrial harmony in the university system.

According to the minister, some institutions had already begun reflecting the new payments, and vice-chancellors were instructed to integrate the components into their payrolls using available resources pending full budget releases.

Lecturers Report Delays Despite FG Assurances

Despite the government’s assurances, many lecturers across federal universities say the new allowance and 40 percent uplift have not been reflected in their January salaries.

Reports from institutions including the University of Lagos, University of Nigeria Nsukka, University of Port Harcourt, Federal University Otuoke, University of Abuja, University of Calabar and Federal University of Lafia indicate that most academic staff received their January 2026 salaries at the old rates. In several branches, lecturers said they had seen no evidence of CATA or any upward review.

ASUU’s national leadership acknowledged that implementation had commenced in a few universities but maintained that the majority of branches were yet to benefit.

Some members also pointed to unresolved arrears from previous agreements and the absence of formal communication from university managements beyond media announcements.

The uneven rollout has heightened concerns within the union. An ASUU official from the South East warned that selective or delayed implementation could fuel fresh tensions if not addressed quickly and transparently.

While many universities are yet to implement the directive, a handful have reportedly begun partial compliance.

At the University of Jos and a few other institutions, some lecturers confirmed receiving their regular base salary followed by a separate CATA credit. In these cases, the tax-free allowance appeared as a distinct entry, reflecting the dual salary structure announced by the government.

However, even in institutions where payments have started, reports suggest that implementation is not yet comprehensive across all cadres, and administrative adjustments are still ongoing.

Vice-chancellors in several universities are said to be grappling with funding constraints, as they were directed to utilize available internal resources while awaiting clearer budgetary releases.

Observers note that without full statutory funding, uniform and sustainable implementation may remain challenging.

The introduction of CATA marks a significant policy shift in how academic compensation is structured, with emphasis on supporting core teaching and research functions through a tax-exempt allowance. If fully implemented nationwide, it could meaningfully increase lecturers’ take-home pay and improve working conditions.

However, the current patchy rollout risks undermining the objectives of the agreement. Trust deficits rooted in years of delayed or partially fulfilled agreements continue to shape perceptions among university staff.

The coming weeks are expected to be critical as February salaries are processed and the 2026 budget advances.

Stakeholders are calling for clearer communication from the Ministry of Education, the National Salaries, Incomes and Wages Commission and university administrations to ensure transparency and uniformity.

For now, the Federal Government maintains that implementation is underway, while many ASUU members continue to wait for the promised adjustments to reflect in their pay.

The resolution of this gap will likely determine whether the latest agreement strengthens stability in Nigeria’s university system or reopens familiar fault lines in labour relations.

Nigeria Revenue Service Sets N40.7trn Target In 2026 After Collecting N28.29trn In 2025

0

The Nigeria Revenue Service announced that it collected a total of ₦28.3 trillion in revenue by December 2025.

Mrs. Amina Kurawa, Executive Director overseeing Government and Large Taxpayers, said the figure represents a rise of over 30 percent compared with the ₦25.5 trillion recorded in 2024.

She revealed this during a staff retreat organised by the service, noting that most of the revenue was generated by the non-oil sector.

Looking ahead, the agency has set a revenue target of ₦40.7 trillion for the 2026 fiscal year.

The service stated that the target will be driven by stronger contributions from non-oil revenue and improved collections from royalty-based income streams.

It also projected growth in non-oil tax receipts in 2026, identifying Company Income Tax, Value Added Tax, and the Development Levy as key contributors to increased government revenue.

At the same time, Zacch Adedeji, Chairman of the Nigeria Revenue Service, encouraged staff to improve their performance in the coming year, stressing that transparency and accountability are at the core of the agency’s work.

FG Orders NAFDAC To Suspend Enforcement of Sachet Alcohol Ban

0

The Federal Government has instructed the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control to suspend all enforcement activities connected to the proposed ban on sachet alcohol and alcoholic products packaged in 200ml PET bottles.

It also cautioned the agency to immediately cease sealing factories and warehouses in relation to the matter.

The directive was announced in a statement released on Wednesday in Abuja by the Special Adviser on Public Affairs to the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Terrence Kuanum.

Kuanum explained that the decision followed a joint intervention by the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation and the Office of the National Security Adviser, both of which expressed concerns about the security implications of continuing enforcement without a fully implemented National Alcohol Policy.

“Accordingly, all actions, decisions, or enforcement measures relating to the ongoing ban on sachet alcohol are to be suspended pending the final consultations and implementation of the National Alcohol Policy and the issuance of a final directive,” the statement read.

He noted that although the National Alcohol Policy had been approved by the Federal Ministry of Health in line with a directive from President Bola Tinubu, both offices maintained that NAFDAC must refrain from any enforcement measures until the policy is fully implemented and further instructions are issued.

The government clarified that such enforcement actions include shutting down factories, sealing warehouses, and publicly promoting the sachet alcohol ban.

According to the statement, the ongoing sealing of warehouses and what it described as a “de facto ban” on sachet alcohol products, without a coordinated policy framework, has already led to economic disruptions and heightened security concerns, particularly due to its effects on employment, supply chains, and informal distribution networks across the country.

Kuanum stated that the latest position reaffirmed an earlier directive issued by the SGF’s office in December 2025, which put all actions related to the proposed ban on hold pending consultations and a final determination.

He added that the SGF’s office had also received a letter dated November 13, 2025, from the House of Representatives Committee on Food and Drugs Administration and Control, expressing concerns about NAFDAC’s proposed enforcement measures and citing existing resolutions of the National Assembly on the matter.

The correspondence, referenced NASS/10/HR/CT.53/77 and signed by the committee’s Deputy Chairman, Hon. Uchenna Okonkwo, highlighted concerns regarding NAFDAC’s intended enforcement steps and pointed to standing resolutions of the National Assembly on the issue.

The Federal Government stated that it is currently reviewing legislative resolutions, public health factors, economic consequences, and broader national interest considerations related to the issue.

It further explained that the involvement of the National Security Adviser indicates that the matter extends beyond regulatory issues, cautioning that premature enforcement without a coordinated policy rollout could disrupt communities, increase unemployment, and create security challenges.

The government assured Nigerians and industry stakeholders that a final decision would be announced after thorough consultations and inter-agency coordination, with due regard for public health, economic stability, and national security.

CBN Approves Weekly FX Sales Of $150,000 To Each BDC

0

The Central Bank of Nigeria has authorised licensed Bureau De Change operators to participate in the Nigerian Foreign Exchange Market as part of efforts to boost foreign exchange liquidity in the retail segment and satisfy the legitimate demands of end users.

The apex bank also set a weekly foreign exchange purchase limit of 150,000 dollars for each BDC, with usage required to comply with existing operational guidelines.

According to a circular signed by the Director of the Trade and Exchange Department, Musa Nakorji, all BDCs licensed by the CBN are allowed to obtain foreign exchange through any Authorised Dealer Bank of their choice at prevailing market rates.

The circular stated that the initiative is intended to enhance market efficiency and expand access to foreign exchange throughout the economy.

However, the CBN introduced strict compliance and risk management requirements for such transactions.

Authorised dealers must carry out comprehensive Know Your Customer checks and due diligence on BDC clients before processing any foreign exchange sale.

To promote transparency and accountability, the CBN instructed all licensed BDCs to submit prompt and accurate electronic returns in accordance with existing regulations.

Any foreign exchange not utilised must be returned to the market within 24 hours, as BDCs are not permitted to retain FX positions acquired from the Nigerian Foreign Exchange Market.

The circular also places limits on settlement procedures, requiring that all foreign exchange transactions be executed through settlement accounts held with licensed financial institutions.

Third party transactions are not allowed, and cash settlements are restricted to a maximum of 25 percent of the total transaction value.

Overall, the directive forms part of the CBN’s broader approach to combine improved market access with firm regulatory oversight, ensuring liquidity in the foreign exchange market while protecting the stability of the financial system.

Dangote Refinery Cuts Petrol Price To ₦774 Per Litre

0

Dangote Refinery has lowered the gantry price of Premium Motor Spirit by N25 per litre.

As a result, the ex depot price has decreased from N799 to N774 per litre.

The price adjustment was announced in a notice issued to marketers by the Group Commercial Operations Department of Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals FZE, stating that it takes effect immediately.

“This is to notify you of a change in our PMS gantry price from N799 per litre to N774 per litre,” the notice read.

The refinery also informed marketers that its PMS lifting incentive programme has been discontinued.

The price revision is expected to enhance the competitiveness of locally refined petroleum products.

The reduction in the ex depot price announced on Tuesday marks the latest adjustment in the cost of the essential commodity, which analysts say is largely influenced by exchange rate movements and global crude oil prices, among other factors.

In the previous year, the ex depot price fluctuated mostly between N700 and above N800 per litre, impacting the retail pump price of PMS.

The 650,000 barrel per day Dangote refinery, the largest in Africa, commenced petrol distribution in 2024.

In January of that year, the facility established by Nigerian businessman Aliko Dangote began producing diesel and aviation fuel.

Nigeria has historically exchanged crude oil valued at billions of dollars for imported petrol, which was subsidised for years to keep domestic prices low.

Fuel imports and subsidy payments significantly depleted foreign exchange reserves at a time when the country has been facing declining oil revenues and shortages of foreign currency.

Since assuming office in May 2023, President Bola Tinubu has removed longstanding fuel subsidies and allowed the naira to float as part of economic reforms aimed at attracting foreign investment and fostering sustainable growth.

However, in the immediate term, fuel prices have more than doubled, and inflation reached a 30 year high of 34 percent in June 2024.

CAC Launches Free Business Name Registration For 3,500 Small Enterprises Nationwide

0

The Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) has introduced a major initiative to support small businesses across Nigeria, offering free business name registration to 3,500 enterprises across the country’s 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

The Registrar-General of the commission, Hussaini Magaji, shared the announcement in a post on the CAC’s X handle on Monday.

Magaji explained that the programme is intended to reduce the cost of business formalisation for micro and small enterprises and to encourage more entrepreneurs to operate within the formal economy.

“In the spirit of the celebration, the CAC has announced free business name registration for 3,500 small businesses, to be distributed across the 36 states of the federation and the Federal Capital Territory,” the commission said in a statement.

He added that the initiative seeks to motivate small businesses to formalise their operations, giving them access to government services, financing opportunities, and broader participation in the economy.

Reflecting on the commission’s 35-year history, the registrar-general described the CAC as a product of “vision, innovation, and sustained commitment to national development.”

He noted that the agency has evolved into a technology-driven organisation prioritising efficiency, transparency, and adherence to global best practices.

As part of efforts to advance digital transformation, Magaji revealed that the CAC would sign a collaboration letter with Google to strengthen its digital infrastructure and service delivery. He said the partnership is expected to enhance portal performance and further simplify the ease of doing business in Nigeria.

Magaji also disclosed the launch of a redesigned CAC website featuring new digital tools, including an AI Lawyer and a business name generator.

He explained that the AI Lawyer will provide instant guidance on CAC laws and procedures, while the business name generator will make reserving scalable business names easier.

Plateau Farmers, Herders Sign 25 Peace Deal To End Bokkos–Riyom Killings

0

In a move to end years of bloodshed, farmers and herders from six rural communities in Bokkos and Riyom Local Government Areas of Plateau State have formalised 25 peace agreements designed to restore calm and rebuild mutual trust.

The deals were signed by representatives, both men and women, from Sha, Bum and Sopp communities, areas that have repeatedly witnessed deadly clashes and extensive destruction of property.

The agreements emerged after a series of dialogue and reconciliation meetings organised by the Institute for Integrated Transitions as part of broader efforts to promote unity and secure lasting peace in conflict affected rural areas.

Lazaros David, a senior district head from Bokkos Local Government Area who took part in the process, described the initiative as both timely and necessary in light of the serious challenges confronting the communities.

He said the facilitators were able to unite residents at the grassroots level through consistent and sustained engagement.

“They followed the programme time after time to ensure its success. They identified our problems and discussed them together with us,” he said.

David expressed optimism that the resolutions would be carried out faithfully, noting that community leaders plan to use gatherings in churches and mosques to reinforce the peace message.

“Where you often see your people, we’ll make sure this peace holds,” he added.

Another participant, Chiroma Haruna Idris, said the effort would significantly help to rebuild stability and harmony between farmers and herders.

“Our coming here has helped us understand the challenges, and we’re confident that what we’ve learned will assist us in addressing our common concerns peacefully without further disruption and confusion,” Idris said, adding that the agreements would address longstanding grievances between the groups.

What the Appeal Court Suspension Uphold Means For Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan

0

The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja has confirmed the suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan, who represents Kogi Central in the Nigerian Senate. In a unanimous judgment delivered on Monday, February 9, 2026, a three member panel of justices held that the Senate acted within its constitutional and procedural authority when it imposed a six month suspension on the lawmaker over alleged misconduct.

The appellate court ruled that the suspension did not breach Senator Akpoti Uduaghan’s parliamentary privileges or her fundamental constitutional rights.

However, the court overturned the contempt proceedings and the five million naira fine earlier imposed on her by the Federal High Court following a satirical apology she directed at Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

Background of the Suspension

The dispute originated from an incident that occurred on February 20, 2025, during a Senate plenary session. At the sitting, the Senate President reassigned Senator Akpoti Uduaghan’s seat and instructed her to move to a different location.

She declined to comply with the directive and insisted on addressing the chamber from her former seat. As a result, the Senate President refused to grant her the floor, relying on Senate Rules which require lawmakers to speak only from their officially assigned seats.

Her continued refusal to obey the instruction, along with her failure to appear before the Senate Committee on Ethics, Petitions, and Privileges to which the matter had been referred, prompted disciplinary action. The Senate subsequently imposed a six month suspension on her.

Senator Akpoti Uduaghan challenged the suspension before the courts, contending that it violated her rights and parliamentary privileges.

The Federal High Court initially entertained the suit, but aspects of the case, including the contempt findings, were later taken on appeal.

Key Rulings from the Appeal Court

In its decision, the Court of Appeal affirmed the Senate’s authority to discipline its members. In the lead judgment delivered by Justice Abba B. Muhammed, also identified in some reports as A. B. Muhammed or Abba Bello Mohammed, the court held that the Senate is empowered under its Standing Rules, including Section 66(4), to sanction erring lawmakers in order to maintain order and ensure smooth legislative proceedings.

The justices also ruled that the Senate President has the power to allocate seats within the chamber and that prior notice is not required before such changes are made.

The court found that Senator Akpoti Uduaghan was wrong to refuse to move to her newly assigned seat, noting that her action justified the enforcement of Senate orders.

On the issue of rights, the court held that there was no violation of parliamentary privilege or constitutional guarantees. According to the judgment, the senator failed to properly position herself in accordance with Senate procedures to exercise her right to speak.

The appellate court, however, criticized the Federal High Court’s handling of the contempt proceedings. It identified procedural defects, including the failure to properly serve Forms 48 and 49, and on that basis set aside the contempt finding and nullified the five million naira fine imposed on the senator.

The court also dismissed claims that the suspension violated an earlier order made by Justice Obiora Egwuatu. It held that the judge’s recusal from the case and the recommencement of proceedings before Justice Binta Nyako meant that any prior order was no longer in effect.

The appeal, identified as CA ABJ CV 1107 2025, was filed against the Clerk of the National Assembly and other parties.

Implications for Senator Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan

The decision of the Court of Appeal carries far reaching consequences for the suspended lawmaker.

The six month suspension remains in effect, meaning that Senator Akpoti Uduaghan will continue to be barred from participating in Senate sittings, debates, committee assignments, and the receipt of legislative allowances for the duration of the suspension.

This effectively removes her from active legislative duties until the suspension period ends, unless further legal steps alter the outcome.

Politically, the ruling reinforces the authority of the Senate to manage its internal affairs and limits the scope of judicial intervention in legislative discipline, except where clear constitutional violations are established. This outcome may weaken the senator’s standing in ongoing political disputes within the Senate and among her constituents.

The decision nevertheless provides partial relief, as the setting aside of the contempt charge and fine removes the financial burden of the five million naira penalty and clears her of the stigma associated with a contempt finding.

As the judgment was delivered by the Court of Appeal, Senator Akpoti Uduaghan retains the option of approaching the Supreme Court. Any further appeal would depend on her ability to establish substantial errors of law or jurisdiction in the appellate court’s decision.

Beyond the individual case, the ruling strengthens the precedent affirming the autonomy of the National Assembly in regulating its internal conduct, a position that could influence the handling of future disciplinary matters within the legislature.

The Senate has welcomed the judgment, describing it as a validation of its disciplinary powers.

Senator Akpoti Uduaghan and her supporters have continued to frame the case as a struggle against what they view as institutional overreach, although the appellate decision clearly favors the position of the upper legislative chamber.

The ruling represents a significant moment in the high profile confrontation between the senator and the leadership of the Senate, with her suspension now firmly upheld at the appellate level.

Israel Approves New Measures To Expand West Bank Settlements

0

Israel’s Security Cabinet on Sunday approved a series of measures aimed at significantly changing the legal and civil framework in the occupied West Bank, boosting Israeli control and facilitating settlement expansion, Israeli media reported.

According to public broadcaster KAN, the decisions, driven by Defense Minister Israel Katz and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, include repealing a Jordanian-era law that prohibits the sale of Palestinian land to Jews in the West Bank, unsealing land ownership records, and transferring authority over building permits in a Hebron settlement bloc from the Palestinian municipality to Israel’s Civil Administration.

Yedioth Ahronoth noted that these steps are expected to transform land registration and purchase processes in the West Bank. Opening land records will publicly reveal property owners’ names, allowing Israeli buyers to contact them directly and streamlining land acquisitions and settlement expansion.

The cabinet also eliminated the need for a special “transaction permit” to finalize land purchases and reduced the Civil Administration’s oversight to basic registration requirements, a move the newspaper described as a significant legal shift that would be challenging to reverse.

Additionally, the measures expand Israeli enforcement powers into Areas A and B, citing alleged violations such as unlicensed construction, water-related issues, and damage to archaeological and environmental sites. This could allow Israeli authorities to demolish or seize Palestinian property even in areas under Palestinian civil and security control, the reports said.

Some of the decisions directly impact Hebron, transferring planning and construction authority at the Ibrahimi Mosque and surrounding religious sites from the Hebron municipality to Israel’s Civil Administration planning bodies. This change would conflict with arrangements under the 1997 Hebron Protocol between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization.

KAN quoted Katz as saying the decisions “reflect a clear policy to strengthen the Israeli presence in Judea and Samaria,” using the Hebrew term for the West Bank. Smotrich added that the measures “end discrimination against settlers,” according to the broadcaster.

Under the 1993 Oslo Accords, Area A is under full Palestinian civil and security control, Area B under Palestinian civil control with Israeli security oversight, and Area C under full Israeli control.

Israeli authorities have continued demolishing Palestinian homes and structures across the West Bank due to lack of permits, amid what Palestinians describe as restrictive policies making it extremely difficult to obtain building approvals.

According to the Colonization and Wall Resistance Commission, Israel carried out 538 demolitions in 2025, affecting roughly 1,400 homes and structures—an unprecedented rise compared with previous years.