Fifa and its president Gianni Infantino have been accused of breaking trust “through deception” in an open letter issued by Uefa, Concacaf and the Asian Football Confederation. Signed by the presidents and general secretaries of all three bodies, the letter said the controversy surrounding the now-abandoned Fifa Forward Enterprise (FFE) proposal was fundamentally about the integrity of the game and of those elected to lead it.
The FFE plan would have created a new company to manage commercial and ticketing rights for all Fifa competitions, including the World Cup, with 21 percent of it sold to a private investment firm. The proposal was scrapped after fierce criticism from several confederations, led by Uefa, which has threatened to boycott all Fifa competitions.
“When trust is broken through deception, when an individual places himself above the collective that entrusted him with authority, that duty has been abandoned,” the letter stated, adding that leadership in football is “a duty of service” rather than something to be held or demanded. Although Infantino was not named directly, sources told the BBC the statement should be read as an invitation for him to step down with dignity. The letter follows a strongly worded Fifa statement issued Saturday evening condemning what it called a “concerted and ongoing effort” to undermine the organisation and its president.
The three confederations, representing Europe, North and Central America and the Caribbean, and Asia, also criticised Fifa’s account of a meeting Infantino called with management board members in Rabat, Morocco last week, saying council members and national associations were excluded in favour of Fifa’s own senior staff. They argued that Fifa’s admission of mistakes in the FFE process did not go far enough, stating there was still no acknowledgment that the proposal itself was fundamentally flawed or that attempting to sell a stake in the World Cup represented “a profound failure of judgement” rather than a simple procedural error.
Fifa has pledged to present a report at the next council meeting, expected in October, but the confederations argued that proper governance would require an independent third party to conduct the review instead. The letter also reiterated Uefa’s legal warning that Fifa must not delete or destroy any documents connected to the scrapped plans.
According to BBC Sport, the three confederations have held preliminary talks about launching breakaway competitions should Infantino remain in his role. The letter described football’s unity as its greatest strength and called for that unity to guide leadership going forward. Still, neither Concacaf nor Asia has formally committed to a boycott, and support for Infantino remains split within both confederations, Mexico has backed him within Concacaf, while eight of the Asian confederation’s 46 members, including the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Kuwait, have publicly voiced their support.
The first real test of Uefa’s threatened boycott comes in just over three weeks, when the Fifa Under-20 Women’s World Cup begins in Poland, featuring several European nations including England and France, both of which have confirmed they still plan to compete.
Analysis: Pressure mounts in football’s civil war
The joint letter marks a significant escalation. Sources close to the anti-Infantino camp say the message is clear: resign now, rather than seek re-election in March. The three confederations are reportedly already exploring how to organise alternative competitions so players can continue competing even if a boycott of Fifa events, such as next month’s Under-20 Women’s World Cup, goes ahead.
Asia has emerged as a pivotal battleground in the standoff. While some of its 46 members continue to back Infantino, the involvement of AFC president Sheikh Salman in signing the letter suggests confidence that a meaningful bloc favours change. Infantino still holds support across South America, Africa and part of Concacaf, including Mexico, but if Uefa and Concacaf were to vote together, only around a third of Asian nations would need to join them to defeat him.
Whether a unifying alternative candidate exists remains uncertain, and the fact that Infantino’s opponents are pushing so hard for a voluntary resignation suggests they may still lack the votes needed to remove him outright. Regardless, the renewed show of unity against him marks a further intensification of the pressure building in world football’s ongoing power struggle.
Discover more from LN247
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

