DSS forensic investigator Segun Kayode says $500,000 and $100,000 were set aside for EFCC officers and intermediaries; recordings allegedly name SAN AU Mustapha, Jimi Lawal and Bashir El-Rufai
Segun Kayode, the prosecution’s first witness, said forensic audio captured discussions on buying off EFCC officers and shielding two companies from investigation.
Kaduna, October 13, 2026 — A State Security Service forensic investigator told a Kaduna State High Court on Tuesday that former Governor Nasir El-Rufai and some associates earmarked $600,000 to settle officials of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and intermediaries connected to a pending investigation.
Testifying as the first prosecution witness before Justice Darius Khobo at the Kawo judicial division, Segun Kayode said the sum was split into $500,000 and $100,000, and that forensic audio recordings captured conversations involving the former governor and suspected associates. He said the conversations centred on alleged efforts to frustrate an EFCC probe into a company identified as Singularity.
Those allegedly mentioned in the recordings include Senior Advocate of Nigeria AU Mustapha (SAN), Jimi Lawal and Bashir El-Rufai. According to Kayode, Mustapha and Lawal were directed to meet one Ahmadu Sule to obtain a template earlier used to liquidate another company, with plans to apply a similar process to Singularity in Nigeria and Mauritius, where the firm was reportedly under investigation by the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit. The investigator said the tapes also contained discussions on preventing the EFCC from investigating IHS, which he noted is listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
The defence fight over the witness
El-Rufai’s lead counsel, Paul Erokoro (SAN), objected, arguing Kayode’s name and summary of evidence were absent from the prosecution’s proof of evidence, and invoking Section 210 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law (ACJL) 2017, contending the subpoena should have been served on the defence. ICPC counsel Ayodeji Adedipe (SAN) countered that Kayode was a subpoenaed witness — the subpoena issued and signed by the court on June 30, 2026 — and that the omission did not render his testimony inadmissible, since cross-examination remained available.
Justice Khobo acknowledged the gap in the proof of evidence but held the records showed the witness was duly subpoenaed, and overruled the objection, directing Kayode to proceed. When Kayode later handed a hard copy of his findings to the court clerk — admitted as Exhibit One — the defence complained it had not been served in time to study it. The judge ruled the defence could obtain a certified true copy for examination.
Eight hours, two of them on tape
Proceedings ran from 12:26 p.m. to 8:18 p.m., roughly two hours consumed by playing the recorded conversations. The case was adjourned to November 30 and December 1, 2026 for cross-examination, by agreement of both sides.
The wider case
El-Rufai arrived at the court premises about 11:50 a.m. ahead of the noon hearing amid tight security, accompanied by African Democratic Congress Kaduna governorship candidate Isa Ashiru. His appearance followed an order directing the ICPC to produce him; the previous sitting had been adjourned on Monday after he was absent, with information that he sought access to his personal physician to review medical test results.
The resumed hearing came days after the Court of Appeal in Kaduna, in a judgment delivered October 9, dismissed El-Rufai’s appeal against the refusal of bail, holding he had not established grounds to warrant interference.
The former governor has been in ICPC custody since February 18, 2026, over allegations of financial misconduct tied to his 2015–2023 administration. A Kaduna State House of Assembly petition alleges the diversion and mismanagement of more than N423 billion in public funds. He faces multiple suits spanning money laundering, abuse of office and fraud before different courts.
El-Rufai has denied all wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty. The allegations remain subject to judicial determination, and he is presumed innocent under the Constitution.
Discover more from LN247
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
