ln247 logo
ln247 logo

INEC, Others Oppose Atiku’s Live Broadcast Request

The Presidential Election Petition Court on Thursday heard the application by the People’s Democratic Party and its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, to allow for the live televising of the ongoing election petition proceedings.

Parties to the petition adopted their processes and agreed that documents certified by the Independent Electoral Commission will be tendered without objections.

The PDP and Atiku through their counsel, Chris Uche, SAN, had prayed to the court for an order allowing the live broadcast of the proceeding due to the monumental importance of the case. Petition: Atiku Seek Live Broadcast of Proceedings

The petitioners argued that Nigerians being stakeholders have a right to have a real-time information about the election petition proceedings.

All the respondents to the petition namely INEC, the president-elect, Bola Tinubu, and the All Progressives Congress vehemently opposed the application.

Among other reasons, they contended that the court is not a circus, a film house or a theatre but for serious and solemn business.

Counsel for APC, Lateef Fagbemi, asked the court not to concede the request to turn the court into a Big Brother electoral series.

After hearing arguments from all parties, the court stood down for five minutes.

On Wednesday, it was reported that Tinubu, and the Vice President-elect, Kashim Shettima, urged the court to dismiss the application by Atiku and PDP for a live broadcast of proceedings.

They argued that the relief sought by the applicants are not such that the court could grant it.

 “With much respect to the petitioners, the motion is an abuse of the processes of this honourable court,” the respondents stated.

Besides describing the application as frivolous, they said the court was not a soapbox, stadium or theatre where the public should be entertained.

Through their team of lawyers, led by Chief Wole Olanipekun, they wondered why a petitioner would file an application to distract the court and waste its precious time.

They stated, in the counter affidavit, that the application relates to policy formulation of the court, which is outside the PEPC’s jurisdiction as constituted.

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

For Advert Placements, Email: info@ln247.news

Latest Articles