The World Health Organization has raised a red flag over the rapidly deteriorating healthcare situation in Gaza, warning that the region’s medical infrastructure is on the brink of collapse. Nasser Medical Complex, a vital referral hub, and Al-Amal Hospital are now facing imminent shutdown. In northern Gaza, not a single hospital remains operational.

These two facilities in Khan Younis—the only public hospitals still active in the area—are serving a displaced and densely packed population. Should they become non-operational, countless people would be left without access to urgent medical care.

Though no direct evacuation orders have been given for patients or staff, both hospitals are situated within or adjacent to the zone designated for evacuation on 2 June. Health authorities have been informed by Israeli officials that the access roads leading to these facilities will be blocked. This would make it nearly impossible for patients and medical teams to enter or exit, rendering both hospitals effectively cut off. Any further deterioration could result in the total collapse of services, due to safety concerns, lack of mobility, and inability to deliver medical supplies or relocate patients.

Currently, Nasser and Al-Amal are stretched far beyond their normal capacity, receiving a steady stream of critically injured people. Yet, both facilities are facing a severe lack of crucial medicines and supplies. If these hospitals go out of service, it would jeopardize care for individuals requiring surgeries, intensive treatment, transfusions, cancer management, and dialysis support.

The shutdown of both hospitals would remove nearly 500 beds from Gaza’s already strained healthcare network, slashing the total number of functioning beds to under 1,400. That’s about 40% fewer than what was available before the conflict began—despite serving a population of 2 million people.

Healthcare infrastructure in Gaza has suffered repeated blows over an extended period. This destruction must stop. For more than 20 months, medical workers and aid organizations have managed to keep some semblance of care available despite daunting conditions. Yet continuous bombardments, restricted humanitarian aid, and lack of access have relentlessly undermined what remains of the healthcare system.

“WHO calls for urgent protection of Nasser Medical Complex and Al-Amal Hospital to ensure they remain accessible, functional and safe from attacks and hostilities. Patients seeking refuge and care to save their lives must not risk losing them trying to reach hospitals. Hospitals must never be militarized or targeted.”

The organization also insists that life-saving medicines and critical medical supplies be allowed into Gaza without delay, using every available route to deliver them.

“WHO calls for an immediate and lasting ceasefire.”

Once allies who traded mutual praise and political synergy, President Donald Trump and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk are now caught in one of the most visible and tense political fallouts in recent U.S. history. What began as a policy disagreement over government spending has gradually turned into a deeply personal and public confrontation — marked by harsh accusations, threats to business partnerships, and a flood of online statements.

The Issues at Hand

At the center of this rift lies the Trump-backed “One Big Beautiful Bill,” a sweeping piece of legislation combining tax relief with massive increases in defense and immigration enforcement spending.

Musk, having just departed a cost-cutting advisory role in the administration, took to his platform X (formerly Twitter) to call the bill a “disgusting abomination” that would “massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion.”

This marked Musk’s first serious public break with Trump, whom he had supported both financially (with more than $250 million in campaign donations) and strategically through policy involvement.

Tensions deepened when it became apparent that the bill also contained provisions eliminating certain tax breaks — including electric vehicle incentives — which could impact Tesla. But sources close to Musk also revealed additional frustration stemming from the government’s rejection of a proposal to shift U.S. air traffic infrastructure to Musk’s satellite network, Starlink.
From there, the friction escalated quickly.

Trump responded swiftly, using Truth Social to mock Musk’s mental state and hint at removing his companies from lucrative federal contracts. He implied that Musk had become unstable after being denied influence over the infrastructure bill. “Elon was ‘wearing thin,’ I asked him to leave,” Trump wrote. “He just went CRAZY!”

But it was Musk who delivered a shock to the system.

On Thursday afternoon, Musk stunned observers by posting:
“Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!”
The implications of the post were explosive — and unsubstantiated. No evidence was provided, and Musk has not explained how he would have access to unreleased files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier who died in 2019 while awaiting sex trafficking charges.

Nonetheless, the accusation marked a new, highly personal phase in the feud, described by one West Wing aide as “a total divorce.”

Social Media Reactions

The internet, predictably, erupted. Here are some notable posts on X
Bill Ackman (@BillAckman)

“I support @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk and they should make peace for the benefit of our great country.
We are much stronger together than apart.”

Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11)

“President Trump built this movement over 10 years. His supporters are NOT going anywhere.
I hope Elon and Trump reconcile and do so privately. It would be good for the country and the world if they do.”

Sen. JD Vance (@JDVance)

“President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I’m proud to stand beside him.”

The Implications

This public clash between two of the most influential figures in business and politics could have serious ripple effects.
From a business standpoint, Tesla’s stock experienced a sharp decline, falling 14.2% on Thursday, which erased about $152 billion from the company’s market capitalization. This downturn reflects investor concern over potential political and regulatory fallout from the feud.

Trump’s suggestion that the federal government review SpaceX and Tesla contracts raises concerns for national security projects and the future of commercial space launches — particularly those involving NASA partnerships and defense-related satellite infrastructure.

On the political side, the Republican Party is now facing pressure to choose between two prominent power brokers. While some lawmakers remain firmly behind Trump, others quietly acknowledge Musk’s influence, especially among younger voters and tech-minded conservatives.
And from the public’s perspective, there are growing concerns about how much power is concentrated in the hands of individuals who can stir national conversations — or derail legislative agendas — with a single post.

What’s Next?

Despite public calls for peace from figures like Bill Ackman, the future of the Trump–Musk relationship remains uncertain.
Musk has already stepped back from at least one controversial threat, to decommission the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft, following a calming post from a user on X. “Good advice,” he replied. “Ok, we won’t decommission Dragon.”
Still, insiders on both sides believe this rupture won’t heal easily. “We thought this might happen around August,” one Trump aide said privately. “It just came earlier than expected.”

One thing is clear: this dispute is no longer about a spending bill. It has become a test of influence, loyalty, and the balance of power between political leadership and billionaire clout in America’s public life.