On Monday, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa arrived in the United States to prepare for a Wednesday meeting with President Donald Trump.
Ties between Washington and South Africa have reached their lowest point in decades, prompting Ramaphosa’s state visit.
The South African leader aims to restore and strengthen bilateral relations, with a particular focus on trade cooperation.
Since taking office again, Trump has halted all financial assistance to South Africa, removed its ambassador, and made unfounded claims of a government-led genocide against white Afrikaners.
The U.S. recently granted refugee status to 59 white South Africans who claimed persecution in their homeland.
According to the South African presidency, Ramaphosa will address “bilateral, regional, and global issues of interest” during his discussions with Trump.
Accompanying him are several officials, including Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen, who leads the Democratic Alliance, the second-largest party in South Africa’s government of national unity.
During his time in Washington, Ramaphosa is also expected to explore business prospects for companies owned by South African-born Elon Musk, a close ally and advisor to Trump.
The US Supreme Court has cleared the path for the Trump administration to halt deportation protections for roughly 350,000 Venezuelans residing in the United States.
This decision overturns an earlier order by a California judge that had maintained Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelans whose legal protections were set to expire last month.
TPS grants individuals the ability to legally live and work in the US if their home country is considered too dangerous due to conflict, natural disasters, or other “extraordinary and temporary” situations.
The outcome is a legal victory for President Donald Trump, who has consistently turned to the Supreme Court to push through immigration-related policies.
At the time, Alejandro N Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, said the Biden administration extended the program “due to extraordinary and temporary conditions in Venezuela that prevent nationals from returning safely.”
He described Venezuela as being in the midst of “a complex humanitarian crisis marked by widespread hunger and malnutrition, a growing influence and presence of non-state armed groups, repression, and a crumbling infrastructure”.
Figures from the UN refugee agency reveal that nearly eight million Venezuelans have left the country since 2014. While many settled in Latin American and Caribbean nations, a significant number relocated to the United States.
The Trump administration had aimed to end TPS protections and associated work permits by April 2025 — over a year ahead of their original expiration date in October 2026.
In court, government attorneys contended that the US District Court for the Northern District of California had interfered with “the Executive Branch’s inherent powers as to immigration and foreign affairs” by blocking the administration’s plan.
Ahilan Arulanantham, legal representative for the TPS holders, told the BBC that this case may represent “the largest single action stripping any group of non-citizens of immigration status in modern US history”.
“That the Supreme Court authorized this action in a two-paragraph order with no reasoning is truly shocking,” Mr Arulanantham added. “The humanitarian and economic impact of the Court’s decision will be felt immediately, and will reverberate for generations.”
Because this case was presented as an emergency request, the Supreme Court justices did not explain their decision.
Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson registered a dissent, according to the court’s brief order.
The Trump administration is also expected to move forward in August with plans to terminate TPS protections for many Haitians.
This ruling is one of several recent immigration-related decisions the Supreme Court has been asked to resolve under the Trump administration’s policies.
Just last week, the administration requested the high court to eliminate humanitarian parole for hundreds of thousands of immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
However, not all efforts have succeeded — on Friday, the Supreme Court rejected Trump’s attempt to use the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport immigrants from north Texas. The justices questioned whether the president had the legal authority to enforce such an action.
Following a conversation on Monday between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump announced that negotiations between Russia and Ukraine for a ceasefire would begin immediately. However, the Kremlin tempered expectations, saying progress would take time, and Trump himself seemed hesitant to align with Europe on new sanctions against Moscow.
Trump, in a social media update, said he had shared this development with Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and leaders from the European Union, France, Italy, Germany, and Finland during a joint call held after his meeting with Putin.
“Russia and Ukraine will immediately start negotiations toward a Ceasefire and, more importantly, an END to the War,” Trump declared. He later told reporters at the White House that he believed “some progress is being made.”
Putin expressed appreciation to Trump for backing renewed dialogue between Moscow and Kyiv, referring to recent face-to-face discussions in Turkey– the first since March 2022. But after the Monday call, Putin cautiously stated that things were “generally on the right track.”
“We have agreed with the president of the United States that Russia will propose and is ready to work with the Ukrainian side on a memorandum on a possible future peace accord,” Putin said.
Though the resumption of direct contact signaled a positive shift after over three years of conflict, expectations of a major breakthrough once again went unmet.
European leaders opted to ramp up sanctions against Russia following Trump’s debrief, according to a late Monday post from German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Meanwhile, Trump held off on further punitive measures. When asked about the delay in sanctions, he responded: “Well because I think there’s a chance of getting something done, and if you do that, you can also make it much worse. But there could be a time where that’s going to happen.”
Acknowledging the diplomatic challenges, Trump noted that there were “some big egos involved.” He added that without tangible movement, “I’m just going to back away,” reiterating that “This is not my war.”
No Timeline For Accords
European officials and Ukraine continue to urge Russia to enact an immediate ceasefire, while Trump has tried to persuade Putin to agree to a 30-day halt in hostilities. Putin, however, remains firm that certain conditions must be satisfied first.
According to Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov, no specific timeline for a ceasefire was discussed during the Trump-Putin call. However, the two leaders did talk about a potential prisoner exchange involving nine individuals from each country. Ushakov also noted Trump called the future of U.S.-Russia relations “impressive.”
State news outlets reported Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov saying that discussions between Russia and Ukraine would be complex as both sides work to draft a common peace and ceasefire framework. “There are no deadlines and there cannot be any. It is clear that everyone wants to do this as quickly as possible, but, of course, the devil is in the details,” he mentioned.
Carl Bildt, the former Swedish prime minister, reacted to the call by saying it was “undoubtedly a win for Putin.”
The Russian president, Bildt noted, “deflected the call for an … immediate ceasefire and instead can continue military operations at the same time as he puts pressure on at the negotiating table.”
Potential For Multinational Summit
Following his discussion with Trump, Zelenskiy stated that Ukraine and its allies could consider organizing a high-level summit involving Russia, the United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom to facilitate a resolution.
“Ukraine is ready for direct negotiations with Russia in any format that brings results,” Zelenskiy said on X.
He proposed possible venues such as Turkey, the Vatican, or Switzerland, though it was unclear if this initiative aligned with the negotiations Trump mentioned.
Trump noted that Pope Leo had shown interest in hosting the talks at the Vatican, although the Vatican had not yet issued a response. According to Kremlin spokesperson Peskov, the idea of direct engagement between Putin and Zelenskiy was discussed, and the Vatican’s offer was welcomed, though no decision had been finalized regarding a meeting location for “possible future contacts.”
A source familiar with Trump’s conference call with Ukrainian and European leaders mentioned that some participants were “shocked” by his reluctance to pressure Putin with sanctions.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen commented briefly on X, saying the conversation with Trump was “good” and that it was “important that the U.S. stays engaged.”
Critics of Moscow, including Ukraine and its allies, have accused Russia of stalling negotiations and offering minimal cooperation — just enough to prevent Trump from imposing economic penalties.
Any decision by Trump to implement new sanctions would mark a significant shift, especially given his historically lenient stance toward Moscow and his rollback of Biden-era pro-Ukraine policies.
Trump had earlier encouraged delegates from both sides to meet in Istanbul last week — the first such engagement since 2022 — but the gathering ended without agreement on a truce. Hopes further dwindled after Putin declined Zelenskiy’s invitation for an in-person meeting.
Currently, Putin continues to demand Ukraine pull back troops from four regions claimed by Russia. His forces still occupy a fifth of Ukraine’s territory and are reportedly advancing. He emphasized that the proposed memorandum would address “a number of positions, such as, for example, the principles of settlement, the timing of a possible peace agreement.”
“The main thing for us is to eliminate the root causes of this crisis,” Putin said. “We just need to determine the most effective ways to move towards peace.”
Another accident occurred around 5:30pm on Monday near Karu bridge, along the Abuja-Keffi Expressway, marking the third incident in just two months on this hazardous stretch of road.
The crash involved a Dangote trailer and a J5 sachet water truck, and while no deaths were recorded, one person sustained injuries.
According to Nkechi Isa, spokesperson of the Federal Capital Territory Emergency Management Department (FEMD), “A road accident involving a J5 sachet water truck and a Dangote trailer occurred today at the Karu bridge in the FCT. No life was lost in the incident.”
Isa further explained the sequence of the incident: “The J5 driver, however, sustained some injuries and was taken to the hospital. The accident occurred when the sachet water truck hit its brakes on sighting personnel of the road maintenance agency carrying out repair works on the road by the Karu bridge.”
Describing how the crash happened, she added: “The Dangote trailer coming from behind is reported to have rammed the sachet water truck. The personnel of the FCT Emergency Management Department and the Federal Road Safety Corps attended to the incident.”
How the accidents happened on the same spots
The Monday crash adds to a growing list of accidents that have plagued the Karu bridge area of the Abuja-Keffi expressway. In the last two months alone, three major accidents have occurred along this route — two of which happened in March 2025.
On March 19th, a cement-laden CNG truck lost control and exploded, crashing into multiple vehicles and killing 10 people.
The very next day, another fertilizer truck crashed near the same area after a collision with a Hijet and a dump truck.
While there were no fatalities in that incident, it reinforced concerns about how dangerous this route has become.
Why the Accident May Be Happening
The frequent accidents on this section of the expressway can be traced to a combination of factors: poor road maintenance, heavy truck traffic, brake failures, and the absence of proper enforcement of safety regulations.
The presence of road construction or maintenance works without adequate warning signs often leads to abrupt braking, which can trigger rear-end collision, especially from overloaded or poorly maintained trailers.
Drivers’ recklessness and the high volume of articulated vehicles, especially during rush hours, further compound the risk of crashes.
How Important These Roads Are to the People Living in Abuja
The Abuja-Keffi expressway is a lifeline for thousands of commuters who live in satellite towns like Nyanya, Karu, Mararaba, and Keffi but work or do business in the heart of Abuja.
It also serves as a crucial link to other parts of the country, especially the North Central states like Nasarawa, Benue, and Plateau.
For many residents, it is not just a road but the only viable daily route to access healthcare, education, work, and commerce in the Federal Capital.
Any disruption on this route often leads to long traffic delays, economic losses, and increased vulnerability for road users.
Nollywood actress Mercy Johnson-Okojie opened up about a serious health scare in a now-viral video featuring veteran actress Joke Silva. Her recent significant weight loss sparked widespread speculation and intense discussions on social media.
The actress responded to the reactions, saying she has accepted public scrutiny and chooses not to be bothered by negative comments. Mercy Johnson explained that she understands why people talk, especially when they notice something unusual.
“I understand people will talk when they see something strange, and they will also talk even when they don’t see anything strange,” she said with a smile.
Mercy revealed that she had a cancer scare, which led to surgery to remove her thyroid. She described the time as very tough, especially since her youngest child was just six months old then.
She also shared that after the surgery, doctors told her she would need to take medication for life, which comes with its own side effects.
She said, “I had a cancer scare, and I had my thyroid removed. It was like a journey for us because we have kids, and my lastborn was six months old at that time, we [my husband and I] kept saying, we had to understand this is the new us, let’s get the surgery done.
“When we got there, they said that I was going to be on medication for the rest of my life. We had to sit down, they were saying I can’t miss my medication, telling me the side effects. So, I’m reconciling with what you are saying [my weight loss]. I’m at the point where you realise that this is where we are, let’s grow from here and live in this comfort zone.”
What You Should Know About Your Thyroid
The thyroid is a small, butterfly-shaped gland found at the front of your neck, just beneath the skin. Its primary function is to regulate the speed of your metabolism, which is how your body converts the food you eat into energy. Every cell in your body relies on this energy to operate properly. When the thyroid isn’t functioning as it should, it can affect your entire body.
Can Thyroid Issues Lead to Serious Disease or Cancer?
Thyroid diseases occur when the gland produces either too much or too little of its hormones. If left untreated, some thyroid conditions like nodules or goiters can develop further and, in some cases, become cancerous.
Thyroid cancer begins when abnormal cells in the gland grow uncontrollably. Early detection and proper management are essential, as the disease can silently progress if unnoticed.
Symptoms Of Thyroid Disease
Thyroid disease can present a wide range of symptoms, many of which are commonly mistaken for other medical conditions or even normal stages of life. This can make it difficult to determine whether the symptoms are linked to a thyroid issue or something else entirely.
Common warning signs may include a noticeable lump in the neck, hoarseness, trouble swallowing, or swollen lymph nodes.
Generally, thyroid-related symptoms fall into two categories: those caused by an overactive thyroid (hyperthyroidism) and those caused by an underactive thyroid (hypothyroidism).
Symptoms of hypothyroidism (too little thyroid hormone) include:
Slower heart rate than usual
Constant fatigue
Unexplained weight gain
Increased sensitivity to cold
Dry skin and coarse, brittle hair
Depressed mood
Heavy or prolonged menstrual periods
Symptoms of hyperthyroidism (too much thyroid hormone) include:
Rapid heartbeat (tachycardia)
Difficulty sleeping
Unintentional weight loss
Increased sensitivity to heat
Clammy or sweaty skin
Feelings of anxiety, irritability, or nervousness
Irregular or absent menstrual periods
Recognizing these symptoms early and consulting a healthcare provider is key to effective diagnosis and management.
Treatments For Thyroid Disease
Thyroid conditions can be treated in several ways, depending on the specific diagnosis and severity of the condition. The three primary treatment options include:
Medication: This is often the first line of treatment for many thyroid disorders. For underactive thyroid (hypothyroidism), synthetic thyroid hormones like levothyroxine are used to restore hormone levels. In cases of overactive thyroid (hyperthyroidism), medications such as methimazole or propylthiouracil (PTU) may be prescribed to reduce hormone production.
Surgery: Known as a thyroidectomy, this procedure involves the partial or total removal of the thyroid gland. Surgery is typically recommended for cases involving large goiters, thyroid cancer, or when other treatments haven’t been effective.
Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy:Radioactive iodine therapy is commonly used to treat hyperthyroidism by damaging or destroying overactive thyroid cells, gradually reducing hormone production. In cases of thyroid cancer, external beam radiation or chemotherapy may be used, particularly if the cancer has spread or does not respond to other treatments.
On Monday, 12th of May, 2025, the United States welcomed its first group of white South African refugees under a new policy initiated by President Donald Trump. A chartered flight carrying 59 white South , primarily Afrikaners, landed at Dulles International Airport virginia.
These individuals were granted refugee status under an executive order signed by President Trump in February 2025. The order cited alleged racial discrimination and violence against white farmers in South Africa as the basis for the policy.
The move has sparked significant debate, raising questions about the motivations behind the policy and its broader implications.
Who Are the Afrikaners?
Afrikaners are an ethnic group in South Africa descended from Dutch, German, and French settlers who arrived in the 17th century. They have historically been associated with farming and played a significant role in the country’s political landscape, particularly during the apartheid era.
Although they were not direct participants in the transatlantic slave trade, they were complicit in the use of enslaved labor within the Cape Colony (South Africa). The Dutch East India Company for example, initiated the importation of enslaved individuals to the Cape in 1658, primarily from regions such as Angola and Madagascar. Afrikaner settlers, known as Boers, utilized this labor for agricultural and domestic purposes
The ‘Alleged’ Refugees’ Persecution
President Trump and his South African-born adviser, Elon Musk, had claimed that white South Africans, especially Afrikaners, are facing a “genocide” due to alleged government policies and attacks on white farmers. However, these claims have been widely disputed.
In response to the U.S. government granting refugee status to a small group of 59 white South African Afrikaners, citing alleged racial persecution, the South African government strongly denied these claims, stating that Afrikaners are among the country’s most affluent and influential citizens, and that farm attacks are part of the country’s widespread crime affecting all races, not racially targeted violence.
President Cyril Ramaphosa has been scheduled to meet with President Trump on May 21, 2025, to address these escalating diplomatic tensions .
Political Motivations
Critics suggest that the refugee policy may be politically motivated, aiming to garner support among certain voter groups. The swift implementation of the program, bypassing traditional vetting processes, has raised concerns about its legitimacy and fairness.
While the policy presents itself as a humanitarian effort, critics argue that it selectively prioritizes Afrikaners over other persecuted groups. This selective approach raises questions about the administration’s commitment to universal human rights. By portraying Afrikaners as victims of racial discrimination, Trump aims to galvanize his base ahead of the 2028 election.
President Donald Trump has defended his decision to grant asylum to white South African Afrikaners by asserting that they are victims of racial persecution and violence in South Africa. He has characterized the situation as a “genocide,” citing attacks on white farmers and land expropriation policies as evidence of systemic discrimination. Trump stated, “Farmers are being killed, they happen to be white, but whether they’re white or black makes no difference to me” .
Domestic and International Reactions
The policy has faced criticism both domestically and internationally. Human rights organizations and religious groups have expressed concerns about the preferential treatment given to white South Africans while other refugee programs remain suspended.
The Episcopal Church has ended its refugee resettlement partnership with the U.S. government, citing the preferential treatment of Afrikaners over other refugees. Democratic lawmakers, including Senator Jeanne Shaheen, have condemned the policy as politically motivated and inconsistent with established refugee protocols.
Additionally, the South African government has condemned the policy, viewing it as an affront to the country’s democratic principles.
President Trump’s decision to grant refugee status to white South Africans has ignited a complex debate about race, politics, and immigration policy. While the administration frames the move as a humanitarian gesture, the surrounding controversies suggest that political considerations may also be at play. As the situation develops, it will be crucial to monitor its impact on U.S. domestic politics and international relations.
The race for the 2025 Ballon d’Or is heating up as UEFA unveils a revamped framework for selecting football’s most prestigious individual award. Set to take place on September 22 at the Théâtre du Châtelet in Paris, this year’s ceremony promises a fiercely competitive showdown, with no clear frontrunner dominating the field.
UEFA, in partnership with the award’s organizers, has introduced a new evaluation system emphasizing three core criteria: exceptional individual performances, team successes at club and international levels, and exemplary sportsmanship and fair play. According to L’Équipe, the updated process aims to prioritize merit over reputation or past achievements, ensuring a fairer and more transparent selection.
With major tournaments like the UEFA Champions League, Nations League, and Club World Cup still ongoing, the competition remains wide open. National teams from France, Germany, Portugal, and Spain are expected to play a pivotal role in shaping the outcome, particularly through their performances in the Nations League.
Last year, Manchester City’s Rodri clinched the award, edging out Real Madrid’s Vinicius Jr. thanks to his pivotal contributions to City’s Premier League triumph and Spain’s international success. This year, however, players like Pedri, Raphinha, Robert Lewandowski, and Lamine Yamal could face challenges, as they are unlikely to participate in key upcoming matches.
Kylian Mbappé remains a strong contender despite a trophy-less debut season at Real Madrid. His chase for individual accolades, such as the Golden Boot, and his involvement in high-stakes fixtures could bolster his campaign.
In a groundbreaking step toward gender equality, UEFA also announced that all male award categories will now have equivalent female categories, reinforcing the push for inclusivity in football’s highest honors. As the football world awaits the final stretch of the season, the 2025 Ballon d’Or race promises to be one of the most unpredictable and exciting in recent history.
The newly appointed Registrar of the Teachers Registration Council of Nigeria (TRCN), Dr. Aderonke Soyombo, has pledged to uphold and enhance education standards by ensuring that all teachers in Nigeria are professionally certified and committed to delivering quality education.
Speaking in Abuja during her official resumption of office, Dr. Soyombo reaffirmed the Council’s mandate to professionalize teaching across the country.
She emphasized that universal teacher registration is essential to achieving uniform standards and improving learning outcomes for Nigerian children.
Outlining her vision for the TRCN, Dr. Soyombo stressed the importance of equipping teachers with the necessary skills and resources to adapt to modern educational demands, including digital literacy and innovative teaching methods.
She announced plans to strengthen collaborations with relevant stakeholders and agencies to uphold excellence in the teaching profession.
She called on teachers nationwide to support the Council’s renewed drive to reform and reposition the profession, urging greater cooperation to align with global best practices.
Dr. Soyombo also commended Nigerian teachers for their resilience and dedication despite numerous challenges, assuring them that under her leadership, the TRCN would work to elevate their status and improve the overall quality of education in the country.
The UK government is rolling out tougher visa regulations aimed at citizens of Nigeria, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, prompted by concerns over visa overstays and asylum claims.
In 2024, more than 108,000 asylum applications were recorded, many from individuals who entered the UK legally on work or study visas before seeking asylum.
The Home Office is now working with the National Crime Agency to develop profiling tools to identify visa applicants at risk of overstaying or applying for asylum after entry.
Countries Affected by the Policy
The restrictions focus on visa applicants from Nigeria, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, identified due to the high volume of asylum claims made by individuals from these countries who entered on valid visas.
Home Office data indicates that around 10,000 asylum seekers who arrived on legal visas in 2023 required government-funded housing, with Nigerians, Pakistanis, and Sri Lankans prominently represented.
The policy aims to lower net migration and address the use of legal visa routes as a pathway to asylum.
UK is one of the most sought after countries for education, immigrantion, and other greener pastures for Nigerian citizens. In 2024 alone, over 430,000 Nigerians were reported to have travelled to the UK for varying purposes.
This begs the question on how the latest rules will affect Nigerians seeking visas.
How will this Impact Nigerians Seeking Visas
Nigerians applying for UK visas, particularly for study or work, may encounter stricter requirements and increased scrutiny.
Existing rules already limit international students’ ability to bring dependents, restricting this to those in specific postgraduate research programs or government-funded courses.
This has led to a sharp decline in Nigerian student visa applications, with international student numbers dropping by 16% in 2024.
These new measures could further discourage Nigerian students and professionals from pursuing UK opportunities.
Potential Consequences for UK Universities
Universities in the UK have voiced concerns that the visa restrictions could deepen financial difficulties for British universities, which depend heavily on international student tuition fees.
Nigerian students make up a significant portion of this group, and their reduced numbers could exacerbate existing challenges.
A Universities UK survey reported that 25% of universities have implemented layoffs, 49% have discontinued courses, and 18% have closed departments, with many scaling back on research and infrastructure due to declining international enrollment.
Wider Implications and Concerns
Critics warn that the profiling models could result in discriminatory practices and may face legal challenges.
Migration experts, such as Madeleine Sumption from the Migration Observatory, emphasize that the policy’s success depends on the quality of data and intelligence used, noting that unreliable models could lead to unfair outcomes.
The UK government insists these measures are critical to maintaining the integrity of its immigration system and preventing the misuse of legal entry routes for asylum purposes.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), commonly referred to as the World Court, has delivered a final and binding judgment in a long-standing territorial dispute between Equatorial Guinea and Gabon. On Monday, the ICJ ruled that Equatorial Guinea holds the rightful claim to a group of small islands situated in the oil-rich Gulf of Guinea.
The court’s decision is grounded in a 1900 colonial-era convention that divided territories between France and Spain in West Africa. According to the ruling, this agreement establishes Equatorial Guinea’s sovereignty over the disputed islands.
The ICJ rejected Gabon’s reliance on a 1974 agreement, stating that it did not possess the legal authority of a formal treaty. “The title that holds legal weight regarding sovereignty over the islands is the one held by the Kingdom of Spain as of October 12, 1968, which Equatorial Guinea inherited,” the court declared.
This verdict compels Gabon to withdraw its military forces from Mbanié Island—an uninhabited landmass less than one kilometre in length and approximately 30 hectares in size—where its troops have been stationed since 1972 after displacing Equatorial Guinean forces.
The conflict, which also includes the islands of Cocotiers and Conga, remained largely dormant until oil prospects in the early 2000s revived interest in the region. After years of United Nations-mediated dialogue, both countries agreed in 2016 to allow the ICJ to settle the matter.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
