Home Blog Page 8

Art Auctions In Nigeria: Challenges And Workable Solutions – By Paul Ewurum

0

Art auctions have become an increasingly important part of Nigeria’s art market, providing a platform through which artworks are bought and sold while also contributing to the preservation, promotion, and commercialisation of Nigerian cultural heritage. From traditional and contemporary Nigerian art to works by internationally recognised Nigerian artists, auctions have helped connect artists, collectors, galleries, institutions, and investors. However, despite their potential, the Nigerian art-auction sector faces several challenges that limit its growth and accessibility.

One major challenge is the lack of adequate regulation and standardisation. The Nigerian art market does not yet have a sufficiently comprehensive framework governing authentication, valuation, ownership history, and auction procedures. As a result, buyers may find it difficult to determine whether an artwork is genuine, fairly valued, or legally owned. This problem can undermine confidence in the market and discourage potential collectors.

Another significant issue is artwork authentication and provenance. Provenance refers to the documented history of ownership and origin of an artwork. In Nigeria, inadequate record-keeping and limited access to professional conservation and authentication services can make it difficult to establish the history of some works. The presence of forged or improperly attributed artworks can damage the reputation of the auction market and expose buyers and sellers to financial losses.

Limited public awareness and participation also present challenges. Art auctions are sometimes perceived as activities reserved for wealthy collectors, investors, or art professionals. Many Nigerians may have little understanding of how auctions operate, how artworks are valued, or how they can participate. This relatively narrow customer base restricts the expansion of the market.

The sector is also affected by economic difficulties. Inflation, currency fluctuations, and declining purchasing power can make art acquisition less accessible to individuals and institutions. At the same time, the cost of organising professional auctions—including transportation, insurance, storage, conservation, marketing, and security—can be substantial. These factors can affect both the prices of artworks and the profitability of auction houses.

Another challenge concerns infrastructure and technology. Although online auctions have created new opportunities for reaching international buyers, some auction operators still face limitations in digital infrastructure, payment systems, photography, cataloguing, and reliable online authentication. Inadequate storage and conservation facilities can also expose artworks to deterioration, particularly paintings, sculptures, textiles, and works made from organic materials.

There are, however, several workable solutions. First, relevant government agencies, professional art organisations, auction houses, galleries, and legal experts should work toward clearer industry standards and regulations. Such standards should cover licensing, disclosure of ownership, authentication, auction procedures, buyer protection, taxation, and the movement of artworks across borders. A transparent regulatory environment would improve confidence among both Nigerian and international collectors.

Secondly, auction houses should invest more heavily in professional authentication and provenance research. Partnerships with art historians, conservators, museums, universities, and recognised specialists can help establish the authenticity and history of artworks before they are offered for sale. Digital cataloging and secure databases could also make records easier to preserve and verify.

Public education should receive greater attention. Auction houses, museums, universities, and cultural organisations can organise exhibitions, seminars, workshops, and introductory programmes explaining art collecting and auction procedures. Providing affordable entry-level auctions or sales could also encourage younger collectors and members of the growing middle class to participate.

Technology offers another practical solution. Nigerian auction houses can develop reliable online auction platforms that allow potential buyers within and outside Nigeria to view high-quality images, obtain detailed information about artworks, register electronically, and participate remotely. Digital catalogues, online provenance records, secure payment systems, and appropriate authentication technologies can make the market more accessible and transparent.

Finally, greater collaboration between the government and private sector could strengthen the entire ecosystem. Investment in museums, conservation laboratories, art education, cultural research, storage facilities, and creative-industry infrastructure would provide long-term benefits. Nigerian artists and collectors can also benefit from stronger international partnerships, enabling Nigerian artworks to reach wider global audiences while ensuring that cultural-property laws and ethical standards are respected.

In conclusion, art auctions in Nigeria represent an important avenue for developing the country’s creative economy, promoting artists, preserving cultural heritage, and creating opportunities for collectors and investors. Nevertheless, problems involving regulation, authentication, provenance, public awareness, economic pressures, infrastructure, and technology continue to restrict the sector. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated efforts from government institutions, auction houses, artists, collectors, academics, museums, and technology providers. With stronger standards, professional expertise, public education, digital innovation, and appropriate investment, Nigeria’s art-auction industry can become more transparent, accessible, and sustainable.

Paul Ewurum is a post graduate of University of Lagos

The New Nigerian Lifestyle: When Convenience Changes How We Live

0
Nigerians and when convenience changes the way they live
A busy day in Nigeria around a market area

From the way we eat and work to how we travel, socialise and spend our free time, convenience has become an important part of everyday life.

Food can arrive at our doorstep. Meetings can happen from our phones. Ride-hailing can take us almost anywhere. Entertainment is available at the touch of a screen.

But as life becomes more convenient, are some of us becoming less active, eating differently and spending less time resting?

Experts identify unhealthy diets and insufficient physical activity among major modifiable risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. It also notes that urbanisation and changing lifestyles are influencing food and activity patterns.

This doesn’t mean that convenience is necessarily unhealthy.

The bigger question is balance.

Can we enjoy convenient meals while still making nutritious choices? Can we use cars and ride-hailing while finding opportunities to walk? Can we stay connected without being permanently glued to our screens? Can we work hard without making rest an afterthought?

The Nigerian lifestyle and how it is changing

The modern Nigerian lifestyle is here to stay.

Perhaps the challenge is not going backwards—but finding a healthier way forward.

So, what part of modern life has changed your health habits the most?

Flydubai Co-Pilot Suspect Identified: Who Is Hamam Al Hammami?

0

A Flydubai flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv plunged into a rapid dive on Wednesday after its co-pilot, identified by US media as 29-year-old Omani national Hamam Al Hammami, allegedly attacked Captain Smit Machchhar and seized the controls. Passengers overpowered him and a third pilot took over, landing the aircraft safely in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. Al Hammami had reportedly been identified as a security risk and barred from flying by Oman Air in 2024 over possession of extremist materials, yet continued working in an administrative role. Officials are now investigating how he was cleared to fly again — and for an Israel-bound route. Flydubai suspended Tel Aviv operations pending an official inquiry.

Photograph of  co-pilot Hamam Al Hammami and pilot, Smit Machchhar
Co-pilot Hamam Al Hammami (left) and pilot, Smit Machchhar (right)

Flydubai hijack suspect Hamam Al Hammami: how a flagged security risk reached a Tel Aviv cockpit

The co-pilot accused of attacking his captain and attempting to crash a Flydubai jet bound for Israel has been identified as Hamam Al Hammami, a 29-year-old Omani national whom intelligence and law-enforcement sources say had already been flagged as a security risk.

What happened in the air

Aboard the Dubai-to-Tel Aviv service on Wednesday, Al Hammami allegedly turned on Captain Smit Machchhar and put the aircraft into a rapid dive. The captain fought back, passengers rushed the flight deck and restrained him, and a third pilot travelling in the cabin took the controls. The plane landed safely in Tabuk in north-western Saudi Arabia. Among those credited is passenger Yaniv Hayoun, who says he helped steady the controls until the relief pilot arrived. A physician aboard, Dr Shota Musaev, said the restrained, bloodied suspect told him he was from Oman and repeatedly asked, “Kill me please.”The screening question at the centre of the probeInvestigators say Al Hammami, then an Oman Air co-pilot trainee in 2024, was found with extremist materials and removed from flying duties — but was retained in an administrative post. The central unanswered question is how he was subsequently cleared to fly commercially with Flydubai, and assigned as first officer on one of the world’s most tightly scrutinised routes.

Arriving passengers and family members embracing at Ben Gurion Airport after the diverted Flydubai flight from Dubai.
Israeli passenger Yaniv Hayoun, with blood stains on his shirt, is welcomed at the arrivals gate at Ben Gurion International Airport near Tel Aviv, Israel, Wednesday, Sept. 30, 2026. (AP Photo/Tomer Appelbaum)

Official reactions

Al Hammami has reportedly been cooperating and has indicated his intent was to crash the aircraft in Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the alleged attacker as having undergone Islamist radicalisation and said whoever sent him “will pay a very heavy price,” praising passengers for averting what officials likened to a 9/11-scale tragedy. Flydubai, in a statement attributed to its chief executive, said it had temporarily suspended Tel Aviv operations at the authorities’ request, with a full official investigation under way. Oman Air, Flydubai and the Omani embassy did not immediately comment.

Photograph of Hamam Al Hammami, the Omani co-pilot identified as the suspected Flydubai cockpit attacker.
Hamam Al Hammami, 29, the Omani national identified by US media as the suspected attacker on a Flydubai flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv.

The educational trail

An online biography believed to be his lists aviation management at a British university and engineering in Australia. Buckinghamshire New University confirmed he completed a three-year distance-learning degree in aviation management in 2023 but stressed he received no pilot training there. An Australian institution declined to comment, referring queries to the Australian federal police.

Why it matters

Post-9/11 cockpit security was engineered to keep outsiders out. This case points to the threat already inside — and to the gaps between national security flags and airline vetting records.

Ballon d’Or 2026:Five Big-Name Snubs

0
Ballon d’Or 2026 shortlist featuring five big-name players missing from the nominees
Five major stars were left out of the 2026 Ballon d’Or shortlist, sparking debate over the biggest omissions.

France Football has unveiled the 30 nominees for the 2026 men’s Ballon d’Or, and some of the players left off the list are generating almost as much discussion as those who made it.

The 2026 award covers performances from August 3, 2025 to July 19, 2026, including the FIFA World Cup. The winner will be announced at the London Palladium on October 26. (Ballon d’Or)

 Ballon d’Or 2026 graphic highlighting five major players missing from the shortlist Ballon d’Or 2026 graphic highlighting five major players missing from the shortlist
Five high-profile football stars were left out of the 2026 Ballon d’Or shortlist, triggering debate over the year’s biggest omissions.

Here are five of the biggest names missing from the shortlist.

Raphinha: From Fifth Place to Outside the Top 30

Raphinha’s omission is one of the most striking.

The Barcelona winger finished fifth in the 2025 Ballon d’Or, but he failed to make the 30-man list this time despite scoring 21 goals during the 2025–26 season. (Daily Sports)

Fitness problems may have weakened his case. Raphinha suffered another hamstring injury during Brazil’s 3-0 World Cup victory over Haiti and was limited to just two appearances at the tournament. Brazil were eventually eliminated by Norway in the round of 16. (FIFA)

France Football has not publicly identified a specific reason for leaving him out, but his drop from fifth place to outside the top 30 is one of the biggest changes from last year’s ranking.

Cristiano Ronaldo: Still Missing as Messi Returns

Cristiano Ronaldo is absent from the Ballon d’Or shortlist for a fifth consecutive edition.

His omission is particularly notable because Lionel Messi has returned after missing the 2024 and 2025 lists.

Messi’s 2026 nomination is the 17th of his career, leaving him one behind Ronaldo’s all-time record of 18. Ronaldo’s most recent Ballon d’Or nomination came in 2022. (Ballon d’Or)

Messi strengthened his case during the assessment period by helping Inter Miami win the 2025 MLS Cup and taking Argentina to the 2026 World Cup final. He finished the World Cup with eight goals and four assists. (mlssoccer)

Mohamed Salah: Premier League Names Miss Out

Mohamed Salah is another major absentee.

He is joined outside the shortlist by other high-profile names including Cole Palmer, Bukayo Saka and Victor Osimhen, while players such as Harry Kane, Erling Haaland, Bruno Fernandes and Declan Rice were included. (UEFA.com)

The selections have prompted discussion over how domestic performances, international tournaments and success in European competition were weighted.

Paris Saint-Germain are particularly well represented. Ten current PSG players appear on the list, including summer signing Ferran Torres, while Saudi Pro League players Sadio Mané and Julián Quiñones also earned nominations. (Daily Sports)

Désiré Doué: Champions League Success Was Not Enough

Désiré Doué is another surprise omission.

The PSG attacker finished 14th in the 2025 Ballon d’Or and remained an important part of the Paris side during the 2025–26 campaign.

Yet Doué was left off the shortlist while a large group of PSG teammates — including Ousmane Dembélé, Achraf Hakimi, Khvicha Kvaratskhelia, Marquinhos, Nuno Mendes, João Neves and Willian Pacho — were selected. (Daily Sports)

His absence stands out even more because of the number of PSG players recognised by France Football.

Former PSG attacker Bradley Barcola, who later moved to Liverpool, was also left off the list.

Pedri: World Champion Still Misses Out

Pedri may have one of the strongest arguments among the players who were overlooked.

Barcelona’s official profile confirms that the midfielder appeared in every match of Spain’s victorious 2026 World Cup campaign. (FC Barcelona)

Spain defeated Argentina 1-0 after extra time in the final, with Ferran Torres scoring the winner in the 106th minute. (FIFA)

Six Spanish players made the Ballon d’Or shortlist: Lamine Yamal, Pau Cubarsí, Marc Cucurella, Rodri, Fabián Ruiz and Ferran Torres.

Pedri did not.

His style is not built around huge goal scoring numbers, but his absence raises a familiar Ballon d’Or question: how should influential midfield performances be measured against more visible goals and assists?

What Does the 2026 Shortlist Tell Us?

The 2026 shortlist highlights just how difficult the Ballon d’Or selection becomes when club football and a World Cup fall within the same assessment period.

France Football’s regulations state that voters should consider three factors, in order: individual performances, team performances and trophies, and class and fair play. (Ballon d’Or)

That leaves plenty of room for debate.

Raphinha dropped from fifth to outside the top 30. Ronaldo remains absent while Messi returns. Salah and several other established stars missed out. Doué was overlooked despite PSG’s heavy representation, while Pedri failed to make the cut despite becoming a world champion.

The final rankings — and the identity of the 2026 Ballon d’Or winner — will be revealed in London on October 26.

Dangote Free IPO: What Students Will Pay For Grant

0
Dangote Student Share Grant requires eligible students to buy 10 refinery shares before receiving 10 additional shares
The Dangote Student Share Grant allows eligible students to receive 10 additional refinery shares after first subscribing for 10 shares worth ₦5,250.

The Aliko Dangote Foundation has launched a Student Share Grant Initiative that gives eligible Nigerian tertiary students an opportunity to receive an application for 10 additional shares in Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals FZE.

But despite the “free shares” description, participation itself is not free.

To qualify, students must first successfully complete the programme’s verification process and subscribe for a minimum of 10 Dangote Refinery shares through the designated platform. With the IPO priced at ₦525 per share, that means committing at least ₦5,250 of their own money. The Foundation then funds an application for another 10 shares in the student’s name at no additional cost. 

Dangote Student Share Grant offers eligible Nigerian students 10 additional refinery shares after a minimum ₦5,250 investment
Eligible students must first subscribe for 10 Dangote Refinery shares worth ₦5,250 before the Foundation funds an additional 10-share application.

So what exactly are students getting, who qualifies and what should they understand before putting money into the offer?

How the Dangote Student Share Grant Works

The scheme is tied to the ongoing Dangote Petroleum Refinery Initial Public Offering.

The refinery is offering 4.1 billion ordinary shares at ₦525 each, with a minimum subscription of 10 shares, worth ₦5,250. According to the Nigerian Exchange, the offer opened on September 14 and is scheduled to close on October 13, 2026. 

Under the student initiative, an eligible participant who buys at least 10 shares and completes the required verification can qualify for the Foundation to fund an application for another 10 shares.

In simple terms:

Student pays: ₦5,250 for 10 shares

Foundation funds: Application for another 10 shares worth ₦5,250 at the offer price

Total application: 20 shares worth ₦10,500 at the IPO price

But students should understand an important distinction: this is not a ₦5,250 cash grant. The Foundation is funding an additional share application, not handing students money to spend elsewhere. 

Who Qualifies?

The programme is open to Nigerian students aged 18 and above who attend recognised public or private tertiary institutions.

Students must first complete the Foundation’s verification process and then subscribe for the required minimum number of shares through the designated channel. 

The scheme is intended, according to the Foundation, to introduce young Nigerians to investing, share ownership and long-term wealth creation.

That objective, however, does not remove the financial risk attached to buying shares.

Does Buying 10 Shares Guarantee Another 10?

Students should distinguish between submitting an application for shares and actually having the shares allotted.

Dangote Refinery’s IPO information explains that confirmation of a subscription does not itself mean shares have been allotted. Applications are processed according to the terms of the public offer after the subscription process. 

That means students participating in the Foundation scheme should not assume that paying ₦5,250 instantly gives them ownership of 20 shares.

Their applications still have to go through the applicable IPO and allotment procedures.

What Does Owning Dangote Refinery Shares Mean?

If shares are eventually allotted, the student becomes a shareholder in Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals.

Owning shares means owning a small economic interest in the company. But that does not mean the investment is guaranteed to increase in value.

The refinery’s IPO information warns potential investors that share prices can rise or fall and that investors may not recover the full amount they put in. 

Students should therefore avoid treating the Foundation’s additional shares as guaranteed profit.

For example, 20 shares are worth ₦10,500 at the IPO price of ₦525 each. But their future market value could be higher or lower after listing.

What Are the Risks for Students?

The attraction of the scheme is clear: a student invests enough to apply for 10 shares while the Foundation effectively matches that application with another 10.

But the student’s initial ₦5,250 is still being invested in equities.

That comes with market risk.

There is no guarantee that the shares will rise above the IPO price, and owning shares does not automatically guarantee regular dividend payments.

The SEC has advised prospective Dangote Refinery investors to study the approved prospectus and understand the terms, conditions and risks before subscribing. 

For students, the practical question is therefore not simply “Am I getting 10 free shares?” but also “Can I afford to place ₦5,250 into an investment whose value may fluctuate?”

SEC Warns About Fake Dangote IPO Offers

The Securities and Exchange Commission has also warned investors to be careful about fraudulent platforms and unauthorised offers connected to the Dangote Refinery IPO.

The regulator advised investors to use only officially approved subscription channels, verify websites before providing personal or financial information and avoid sending money to individuals or organisations claiming to accept IPO subscriptions outside approved platforms. 

The SEC specifically warned against unsolicited WhatsApp messages, emails, calls and social-media advertisements offering guaranteed allotments or preferential access to shares. 

That warning is particularly relevant to students who may see posts online advertising “free Dangote shares.”

Earlier in June, before the public offer had received approval, the SEC had also ordered operators to stop unauthorised marketing and solicitation relating to the proposed Dangote Refinery share offer. The IPO was subsequently approved in September. 

So Are the Shares Really Free?

The second set of 10 shares is funded by the Foundation for qualifying students, meaning the student does not personally pay for that additional application.

But there is a condition: the student must first spend at least ₦5,250 to subscribe for 10 shares.

So the more precise description is a conditional share grant or matching investment programme rather than an unconditional giveaway.

Students must also meet the eligibility requirements, complete verification and follow the approved subscription process.

What Students Should Know Before Applying

Before participating, students should confirm that they meet the eligibility requirements, understand that they are investing real money and use only officially recognised channels.

The IPO itself is legitimate: the SEC confirmed its approval in September, while the Nigerian Exchange says the offer comprises 4.1 billion shares at ₦525 each with a minimum purchase of 10 shares. 

But regulatory approval does not guarantee an investor will make a profit.

The Student Share Grant gives eligible students an opportunity to potentially double the number of shares applied for relative to their personal cash contribution. Whether those shares ultimately become a profitable investment is a separate question — and one students should consider before committing their money.

Diesel Breaks £2 A Litre In UK For The First Time

0
A motorist filling a diesel car at a UK petrol station forecourt showing a price board reading more than 200 pence per litre.
UK diesel prices reached a record 200.01p per litre on 2 October 2026, passing £2 for the first time.

UK diesel crossed a threshold no motorist wanted to see: 200.01p a litre on average, the first time past £2. Filling an average family car now costs £110, nearly £32 more than before the US–Iran war began. And the price that has landed may be the last comfortable one — because Washington is considering banning its diesel exports.

The numbers

The RAC reported record diesel at 200.01p on Friday, after 199.33p earlier in the week, beating the 199.09p peak set in June 2022 after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Diesel is up around 59p a litre — close to 40% — since the end of February. Unleaded averages 174.71p, about 42p higher than at the war’s start, putting a petrol tank at roughly £96. Head of policy Simon Williams called it “a pump price threshold that no-one wanted to cross,” adding prices show “no signs of slowing.” He noted petrol is “higher than we would expect,” suggesting some retailers are cross-subsidising to hold diesel slightly lower.

Close-up of a forecourt price display reading 200.9p per litre for diesel at a British petrol station.
The RAC said a full tank of diesel now costs about £110 for the average family car. (Photo credit: BBC)

Why the supply is tight

This is not only the Middle East. Scarcity has been “exacerbated” by the Russian export ban and Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries, which structurally removed diesel output from global markets well before Iran escalated. The UK is unusually exposed: over half its diesel is imported, and 31% of those imports come from the US — precisely the supply Washington is threatening to restrict. One estimate puts UK import cover at around 42 days, with warnings the litre could head toward £2.50 if a ban lands.

Washington’s pressure

President Trump has threatened to restrict diesel exports; Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent argues US farmers, truckers and businesses “should not be left carrying the burden.” The timing is transparent: US midterms on 3 November, with inflation still above the Federal Reserve’s target and Americans facing record diesel above $6.50 a gallon last month. Energy columnist Javier Blas described the American campaign as “very intense.” “The US needed a quid pro quo and they created it,” he said, noting Washington may also ask Europe to release reserves. In Brussels, France proposed member states release 50 million barrels. Blas’s advice: release no more than a third — beyond half, “very vulnerable” if conflicts worsen.

Why a ban could backfire

Dan Brouillette, former US energy secretary, told BBC Radio 4’s Today an export ban is unlikely to hold prices down. The US refines more than it consumes, so blocking exports fills storage; once full, “you begin to shut down the refining production,” and “over a period of time, prices will continue to rise again.” He warned other exporting nations would follow. David Fyfe of Argus Media said removing more than a million barrels a day would trigger a bidding war among Latin American and European buyers, inflate global freight, food and industrial costs, and “feed inflation back into the global economy.” His verdict on the reputational hit: “At a stroke, the US’s reputation as a reliable supplier of energy to the world would be shot.”

Downing Street’s answer

Transport Minister Keir Mather called UK diesel supply “robust” and “resilient,” citing diverse sources and work with the International Energy Agency. “People shouldn’t be concerned about shortages,” he said, noting the fuel duty freeze remains in place. Chancellor John Healey is reported “concerned.” Williams’ prescription is more direct: cut fuel duty further or reduce VAT in October’s budget. Tesco has already moved, offering 8p off a litre — the market’s clearest signal that retailers know how hot this issue has become.

Rivers Lawmakers Visit Flood-Hit Communities

0
Rivers State lawmakers inspect flood-hit communities in Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor
Rivers State lawmakers visited flood-affected communities in Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor after severe flooding damaged homes, roads and livelihoods.

Members of the Rivers State House of Assembly have visited communities affected by severe flooding in Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor Local Government Area as concerns grow over the impact of persistent rainfall across the state.

The lawmakers suspended other legislative activities after Deputy Majority Leader Linda Somiari-Stewart raised the flooding as a matter of urgent public importance during the House’s 55th legislative sitting. (The Guardian Nigeria)

Rivers lawmakers inspect flooded communities in Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor after heavy rainfall
Rivers State lawmakers toured flood-hit communities in Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor to assess damage to homes, roads and livelihoods.

Somiari-Stewart told the House that residents in several communities had suffered damage to homes, property and sources of livelihood, prompting lawmakers to move beyond the Assembly chamber and assess conditions in affected areas themselves. (The Guardian Nigeria)

Rivers Lawmakers Take Flood Assessment to Communities

Following the motion, members of the Assembly voted to visit flood-hit areas in Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor.

During the inspection, the lawmakers moved through flooded locations, examined the extent of the damage and spoke with residents about how the rising water had affected their daily lives.

Speaker of the House Martin Amaewhule said the Assembly decided to carry out the physical inspection after receiving distress calls from residents.

He said lawmakers wanted first-hand information about the scale of the problem rather than relying solely on reports reaching the House. (The Guardian Nigeria)

The visit showed that some families had been displaced while flooding had made several roads difficult or impossible to use.

What Residents Are Going Through

Beyond flooded streets, the disaster is affecting homes, businesses and livelihoods.

Somiari-Stewart raised concerns about reports of reptiles entering some submerged homes, warning that the flooding was creating additional safety risks for residents. (Vanguard News)

The impact is also being felt in local markets.

The Guardian reported that traders in areas including Rumuokoro, Rumuokpoku and Eneka had been attempting to salvage food items damaged by floodwater, with some selling soaked rice, beans, garri and yam at heavily reduced prices. (The Guardian Nigeria)

The development illustrates how the flooding is affecting not only housing and movement but also food supplies and the incomes of traders whose goods have been damaged.

Blocked Canals and Drainage Under Scrutiny

One of the major issues identified during the Assembly’s inspection was the condition of drainage infrastructure.

Amaewhule said lawmakers observed that flooding in some locations appeared to be connected to blocked canals and neglected drainage channels, while some other areas were affected by natural water flow. (The Guardian Nigeria)

He called on agencies responsible for drainage maintenance and desalting to ensure waterways are regularly cleared.

The observation has again brought attention to drainage management in Port Harcourt and surrounding communities, particularly as heavy rainfall continues to put pressure on existing infrastructure.

Clearing canals alone may not account for every source of flooding, but the Assembly said blocked waterways were contributing to the problem in some of the areas lawmakers inspected. (The Guardian Nigeria)

Flooding Extends Beyond Port Harcourt

The flooding is not limited to Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor.

Recent reports have identified flood impacts in several other parts of Rivers State, including Ahoada West, Abua/Odual, Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni, Tai, Oyigbo and Andoni. (Channels Television)

Reports from affected communities indicate that families have been displaced, farmlands submerged, businesses damaged and livelihoods disrupted.

The wider spread of the flooding has increased calls for a longer-term approach to flood management rather than responses limited to individual emergencies. (Channels Television)

Rivers Government Promises Relief

The Rivers State Government has also begun assessing affected communities.

Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu said Governor Siminalayi Fubara directed the State Flood Management and Control Committee to inspect flood-ravaged areas and recommend measures to address both the immediate emergency and its underlying causes. (Channels Television)

The government said affected residents would receive relief materials while officials work on measures intended to reduce the impact of future flooding.

The intervention places attention on how quickly assistance reaches displaced and affected households and what measures are eventually taken to improve drainage and flood-control infrastructure.

What the Rivers Assembly Wants Done Next

Following the inspection, the Assembly called for urgent action from agencies responsible for maintaining canals and drainage systems.

Amaewhule said authorities responsible for desilting waterways needed to carry out their duties effectively, particularly in locations where blocked drains had worsened flooding. (Vanguard News)

The Speaker also expressed hope that the state government would take steps to protect residents and property in affected communities.

For residents, however, the immediate concerns remain more basic: getting water out of their homes, restoring access to roads, protecting damaged property and receiving support for livelihoods disrupted by the flooding.

For residents, however, the immediate concerns remain more basic: getting water out of their homes, restoring access to roads, protecting damaged property and receiving support for livelihoods disrupted by the flooding.”

With the rainy season still ongoing, the response from the Rivers State Government, emergency agencies and drainage authorities will determine how quickly affected communities can recover — and whether vulnerable areas can withstand further rainfall.

Seoul Warns Ukraine of “Further Action” Over North Korean POW Leak

0
Split image showing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky addressing the United Nations General Assembly on the left and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung on the right.
Volodymyr Zelensky's UN General Assembly disclosure and Lee Jae Myung's demand for an apology have driven a wedge between Seoul and Kyiv.

A diplomatic rupture is widening between Seoul and Kyiv after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky disclosed at the UN General Assembly that Ukraine had sent two North Korean prisoners of war to South Korea. Seoul called the disclosure a betrayal of an agreed cover-up. Now it is threatening consequences.

Seoul escalates

South Korean President Lee Jae Myung warned on Friday that if “the refusal to acknowledge the facts and issue a public apology continues, we will take additional measures.” He framed the dispute in national-honour terms — “this is a matter concerning the honour of the Republic of Korea’s people and nation, we cannot overlook it” — rejecting Kyiv’s attempt to re-brand it as a mere “diplomatic misunderstanding.” Seoul has separately summoned Ukraine’s ambassador, Andrii Vieshkin, in protest at what it called a “unilateral” disclosure.

 South Korean President Lee Jae Myung speaking at a podium draped with the national flag during an official address in Seoul.
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung has demanded a public apology from Kyiv over the disclosure of a covert North Korean prisoner-of-war transfer.

What actually happened

The two men were captured fighting alongside Russian forces on a Ukrainian battlefield in early 2025. They are among thousands of North Korean troops deployed in support of Moscow’s war. Both had told local media they wished to reach South Korea. Handing them over quietly suited both capitals: it shielded their families in the North from reprisal, and it spared Kyiv the criticism of trading away a propaganda asset rather than swapping the men for Ukrainian POWs. Zelensky’s public announcement dissolved both protections at once.

The competing accounts

Seoul’s presidential office says Ukraine requested secrecy — and that senior presidential adviser Seong Ghi-hong later demanded an official apology and explanation. Zelensky’s office flatly denies any confidentiality undertaking ever existed. DW has reported Kyiv’s position as a “diplomatic misunderstanding” it is working to resolve, with Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha telling Ukrainian media he hoped for resolution “in the very near future,” adding: “For us, South Korea is an important country.”

Kyiv’s response to Lee’s charge

Lee has gone further than a protocol complaint, accusing Kyiv of attempting to “bring war on the Korean Peninsula” and expressing “grave regret” that Ukrainian officials were invoking the prospect of an inter-Korean military clash instead of owning the breach. As of 2 October, Ukrainian officials had not issued a point-by-point rebuttal of the “further action” threat. Kyiv’s public posture has been containment, not confrontation: deny the NDA existed, decline to apologise, reframe the episode as procedural, and emphasise the relationship’s value. That is a defensible play — but it does not answer Seoul’s central factual allegation, and silence on the “Korean Peninsula” charge risks being read in Seoul as confirmation.

Why it matters

Captured North Korean soldier
The North Korean soldier captured on a Ukrainian battlefield in early 2025 while fighting alongside Russian forces.

South Korea has backed Ukraine politically and humanitarianally since Russia’s full-scale invasion while holding to a long-standing bar on supplying lethal weapons to belligerents. Analysts told the SCMP the row now puts that future ties-and-aid track at risk. It also landed domestically: the Korean opposition has accused Lee’s government of concealing the transfer to avoid antagonising Pyongyang. Zelensky needed Seoul’s voice on the Korean stage; Lee needed Kyiv to keep quiet. Both miscalculated.

How Inmate Christa Pike Survived Lethal Injection

0
Christa Pike survived two doses of Tennessee’s lethal injection drug during a failed execution
Christa Pike survived two doses of pentobarbital during a failed execution in Tennessee, prompting an independent review of the state’s lethal-injection process.

Christa Pike was supposed to die by lethal injection in Tennessee. Instead, after receiving two doses of pentobarbital, she remained alive, continued breathing and was eventually taken from River bend Maximum Security Institution by ambulance.

The failed execution has left Pike in critical condition and triggered an independent review of Tennessee’s execution procedures. Governor Bill Lee has also halted further executions in the state for the rest of 2026. 

Christa Pike during the Tennessee death penalty case after surviving two doses of pentobarbital
Christa Pike survived an initial and backup dose of pentobarbital during a failed Tennessee execution, raising questions about what went wrong with the lethal-injection process.

But one question now dominates the case: how did Christa Pike survive two doses of a drug intended to kill her?

There is no confirmed answer yet. Tennessee officials say the approved protocol was followed, but they have not publicly explained what failed. Medical experts and Pike’s lawyers have pointed to several possibilities, particularly problems getting the drug properly into her bloodstream. 

What Happened Inside Christa Pike’s Execution Chamber

Pike, 50, was strapped to a gurney at River bend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville on September 30.

Media witnesses said the curtain to the execution chamber opened at about 7:27 p.m. Pike already had an IV in her arm. She spoke with her spiritual adviser, sang and gave a final statement. Minutes later, she complained that her arm hurt and asked prison officials whether it was supposed to feel that way. 

Tennessee’s execution protocol allows a backup dose of pentobarbital if the prisoner is still alive after the first dose.

The curtain was briefly closed and then reopened. Pike later appeared to lose consciousness and began making sounds witnesses described as snoring, but she continued breathing.

More than an hour into the procedure, she was still alive. Her lawyers demanded that the execution be stopped and that she receive emergency medical care. An ambulance later arrived, and Pike was transported to hospital. 

By Thursday, her lawyers said she remained in critical condition and was receiving life-saving treatment. 

What Pentobarbital Is Supposed to Do

Tennessee uses a single-drug lethal-injection protocol involving pentobarbital.

Pentobarbital is a barbiturate that suppresses activity in the central nervous system. At the high doses used in executions, it is intended to cause deep unconsciousness, suppress breathing and ultimately lead to death.

Tennessee switched to the single-drug pentobarbital protocol in 2024 after previously using a three-drug procedure. 

In Pike’s case, however, neither the initial nor the backup dose produced the expected result.

That is what has made the incident particularly unusual. The Death Penalty Information Centre said there have been previous executions in which teams struggled to gain access to a prisoner’s veins, but Pike’s case appears exceptional because she remained alive after the execution drugs were administered. 

Why Did the Two Doses Fail?

The exact cause remains unknown.

One of the leading possibilities raised by Pike’s attorneys is that the IV line may not have been properly placed inside a vein.

Her lawyer Steve Ferrell said Pike had a lifelong blood disorder and a history of difficulty having blood drawn. He suggested it was possible the execution drug entered surrounding tissue instead of flowing properly into her bloodstream. 

Another attorney, Randy Spivey, said the execution team spent about an hour trying to administer the drugs and that he counted at least seven needles in Pike’s left arm.

According to Spivey, Pike herself tried to direct officials toward areas where they might be able to find a vein. 

Dr. Ervin Yen, an anaesthesiologist who was not involved in Pike’s execution, told AP that injections into smaller veins could cause the burning sensation Pike reportedly complained about. He said the effect can depend on the vein used and how quickly a substance is injected. 

These accounts raise the possibility that at least some of the pentobarbital may not have circulated through her bloodstream as intended.

But that remains a theory, not an official finding.

Did Pike’s Medical Condition Play a Role?

Pike’s legal team had raised concerns about her veins before the execution.

Her attorneys said she had a lifelong blood disorder that made needle access difficult. They argued that this increased the risk of complications during a lethal injection. 

Those concerns gained renewed attention after witnesses reported repeated attempts to insert needles and Pike complained of pain in her arm.

However, Tennessee has not confirmed that Pike’s medical condition caused the execution to fail.

The independent review ordered by Governor Lee is expected to examine whether her medical history, IV placement, execution drugs or other procedural factors contributed to what happened. 

Could the Drug Itself Have Been the Problem?

Pike’s attorneys have also raised questions about the pentobarbital used in the execution.

Tennessee has previously faced scrutiny over the testing and sourcing of execution drugs. In 2022, the state halted an execution after acknowledging that officials had failed to ensure lethal-injection drugs were properly tested. 

Pike’s legal team has suggested that degraded or improperly handled pentobarbital could be one possible explanation for the failed execution.

But there is currently no public evidence proving that the drug administered to Pike was defective.

The Tennessee Department of Correction has maintained that the chemical used under its protocol has previously been effective. 

What Tennessee Officials Have Said

The Tennessee Department of Correction says its staff followed the state’s approved execution protocol.

The department has not, however, provided a technical explanation for why Pike remained alive after both doses.

Its protocol provides for a backup dose if the first dose does not cause death, but reporting by AP indicates that it does not spell out an additional procedure if the prisoner remains alive after the second dose. 

That gap has become one of the central questions facing the state’s review.

Why Tennessee Has Halted Executions

Governor Bill Lee described the failed execution as “deeply disturbing” and ordered a comprehensive third-party review.

He also postponed Tennessee’s remaining execution scheduled for 2026. 

The review is expected to determine what happened inside the death chamber and whether changes are needed before Tennessee attempts another execution.

The case is also the second time in 2026 that Tennessee has been unable to complete an execution. In an earlier case, officials could not establish suitable IV access and never administered the lethal drugs. 

Pike’s failed execution has therefore renewed wider questions about whether lethal injection can be administered consistently and whether Tennessee’s backup procedures are adequate when something goes wrong.

For now, the central mystery remains unresolved: Christa Pike received both the initial and backup doses of pentobarbital, but survived. Until the state completes its review, no single explanation for that failure has been established.

Eritrea Severs Ties With Ethiopia After Embassy Closure

0
The leader of Eritrea is President Isaias Afwerki, and the leader of Ethiopia is Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed.
Eritrea's foreign ministry said it had "no option but to reciprocate in kind and sever all diplomatic ties with Ethiopia.

A diplomatic rupture followed the sound of explosions. Ethiopia ordered its embassy in Asmara closed and gave ten Eritrean diplomats 48 hours to leave; Eritrea answered by severing all diplomatic ties. Overnight blasts in Addis Ababa had already stoked fear that fighting in the north is no longer contained by it — and Eritrea was once Ethiopia’s ally in that war.

The rupture

Ethiopia’s Foreign Ministry said Thursday it had “decided to close its Embassy in Asmara” in response to what it called Eritrea’s “direct and indirect acts of hostility and belligerence.” Eritrea’s information minister, Yemane Gebremeskel, told Reuters that expelling every Eritrean diplomat amounted in practice to closing Ethiopia’s own mission in Addis Ababa. Eritrea’s foreign ministry said it “has no option but to reciprocate in kind and sever all diplomatic ties with Ethiopia with all the negative corollaries that this entails.” Egypt was drawn in the same hour: Addis Ababa declared an Egyptian diplomat persona non grata, and Cairo retaliated against an Ethiopian embassy counsellor.

President Isaias Afwerki of Eritrea and Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed
Eritrea’s foreign ministry said it had “no option but to reciprocate in kind and sever all diplomatic ties with Ethiopia.”

The reversal that matters

Eritrea’s president fought alongside Ethiopia’s federal government through the 2020–2022 war, and his troops were central to the campaign that broke the TPLF’s hold on western Tigray. That Eritrea is now accused of arming the very movement it helped defeat is either a genuine realignment or an accusation manufactured to reframe a domestic war as foreign aggression. Both readings carry consequences. If the accusation is true, Addis Ababa faces a two-front conflict with a neighbour whose army it once coordinated with. If it is not, the government is preparing a nationalist casus belli. The African Union Commission urged all three states to exercise “maximum restraint.”

The drone question

Ethiopia’s national intelligence service has banned drones over Addis Ababa. The opposition has not previously been known to field armed drones, though the pro-government Tigray Peace Forces say they recovered drone frames and batteries from TPLF-linked fighters on Tuesday. Edward Bach, senior Africa analyst at Verisk Maplecroft, put it plainly: the ability to strike the capital would be “a political game-changer,” collapsing any narrative that Addis Ababa is untouched by the war and eroding the federal forces’ decisive edge — air superiority. A capital that can be hit is a capital that can lose its nerve.

On the ground

Federal forces have advanced in southern Tigray toward the regional capital, Mekelle, while the opposition alliance has taken towns in neighbouring Afar. Pro-government forces say they recaptured Erbeti in Afar, thanking the federal army for “magnificent air support.” Air support is precisely the problem for civilians: it is what makes the advance possible and what makes the towns untenable to live in. Valerie Browning, co-founder of the Afar Pastoralist Development Association, told Reuters tens of thousands have fled their homes.

 Exterior of an embassy building in Asmara, Eritrea, with a closed gate and security barriers.
Ethiopia ordered the closure of its embassy in Asmara on Thursday, prompting Eritrea to sever all diplomatic ties.

Why this could become irreversible

The 2022 Pretoria agreement was never reconciled — it stopped a war without settling why it began, left Eritrea’s alliance with Addis Ababa unexamined, and left Tigray’s politics unresolved. The alliance now facing the federal government includes former enemies who fought each other two years ago, united by opposition to Abiy Ahmed rather than by a shared programme. That is fragile for the opposition and dangerous for everyone else: two million people displaced by the last war, an unresolved border with Eritrea, the GERD dispute poisoning relations with Egypt and Sudan, and a state whose coercive capacity is stretched across several fronts at once. The 48-hour clocks have all run down. What happens in Mekelle will decide more than a town.