Capt Smit Machchhar, the Indian captain of Flydubai flight FZ1073, is recovering in Abu Dhabi after being stabbed by his co-pilot.
The Indian captain of a Flydubai jet bound for Tel Aviv says he was stabbed by his own co-pilot, lying injured on the cockpit floor, when he understood the aircraft was falling — and chose one final effort to unlock the door. “I knew I was not going to let others die,” Captain Smit Machchhar said. 170 people survived.
apt Smit Machchhar, the Indian captain of Flydubai flight FZ1073, is recovering in Abu Dhabi on a call with Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi.
What happened in the air
Flydubai flight FZ1073 from Dubai to Tel Aviv plunged more than 17,000ft (5,200m) about two and a half hours into Wednesday’s early-morning flight. It transmitted an emergency signal to air traffic control before switching to squawk 7500 — the code for hijacking. Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said one pilot stabbed the other before “apparently trying to crash” the plane. Fellow passengers overpowered the attacker, and two reserve pilots travelling on board took the controls, landing at Tabuk Airport in north-west Saudi Arabia at 06:58 local time.
The captain’s account
Machchhar, speaking by video call to Indian PM Narendra Modi, said: “I was lying on the floor injured but I told myself to go for one last push to open the door from inside.” He added: “I was of course fighting for my own life but at the same time I knew I was not going to let others die.” A 17-year veteran, he told Modi he “can tell what is happening to the plane even with my eyes closed.” Netanyahu called him “a true hero.” Aboard, passenger video captured the moment a voice announced, “There’s an extra pilot,” before crew brought the cabin under control.
Capt Smit Machchhar, the Indian captain of Flydubai flight FZ1073, is recovering in Abu Dhabi after being stabbed by his co-pilot.
The attacker
Netanyahu told Fox News the co-pilot was an Omani national and said investigations suggested “Islamist radical indoctrination.” Once restrained and bound by passengers and crew, the man reportedly urged the aircrew to “kill me, kill me” — language Netanyahu called evidence he “was suicidal… that’s not a question.” An Israeli official separately alleged he had discussed “killing Jews” on social media. These remain allegations. The UAE has opened an investigation into “whether the incident was linked to any terrorist activity or purpose.”
Recovery
Machchhar was treated in Tabuk, then airlifted to Abu Dhabi, where he is reported in stable condition. India’s embassy in the UAE said he was “in good health and recovering well”; ambassador Deepak Mittal said he was “proud of Capt Smit for his bravery.” Machchhar, who has been celebrated across Indian social media, kept framing the injury as distance travelled: “I am not looking at this wound like a wound because that would make my recovery even more difficult… I am looking at it as a journey.”
Health workers in full protective equipment at an Ebola treatment facility in eastern DR Congo, where the outbreak has killed 4,018 people
Congo’s Ebola outbreak has passed 4,000 deaths, government data showed Friday, making it the deadliest epidemic in the country’s history and the second-largest in the world after the 2014–16 West African crisis. Death toll: 4,018. Confirmed cases: 8,300 across seven provinces. And unlike previous outbreaks, the world does not have a licensed vaccine for this strain.
The scale
The Bundibugyo-species outbreak surpassed Congo’s 2018–2020 epidemic to become the country’s largest. Globally it is now second only to the West African outbreak that infected more than 28,600 people and killed over 11,000 across Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone. More than 2,000 patients have recovered. The case fatality ratio sits at roughly 48% — Ebola’s historical range is 25–90%, and an outbreak that settles near the middle is not a mild one; it reflects patients reaching care late, in a system with limited capacity to treat them.
In Butembo, a city of around two million, health workers have been treating neighbours and relatives without adequate protective equipment.
Why this strain is harder
This is the critical distinction the toll figures obscure. The Bundibugyo species is uncommon — the 2007 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda was the last major one. The vaccine stockpiled for outbreaks, rVSV-ZEBOV, supposedly protects against Zaire ebolavirus, the species behind the 2014–16 West African epidemic and Congo’s 2018–20 outbreak. Against Bundibugyo it does not confer that protection. So the single most effective tool from recent responses is absent, and containment reverts to the harder work of case isolation, contact tracing for every person for 21 days, safe burial practices and community trust.
Where it is spreading
Government and UN officials said last month transmission was slowing in parts of Ituri province, where the outbreak began. Elsewhere it is accelerating. The epicentre has shifted to North Kivu, where transmission is described as speeding up in Butembo, a dense city of around two million. South Ubangi, in the far northwest, became the seventh province affected after a man who had travelled from eastern Congo died — a geographic distance that matters, because it converts a regional epidemic into a national one and confirms the virus is travelling with people, on ordinary routes, faster than the response is containing it.
The response is under attack
Containment depends on something fragile: cooperation. Attacks on response officials are increasing in a region already shaped by decades of armed conflict and displacement. A Médecins Sans Frontières staff member contracted the virus and is being evacuated. In Butembo, MSF’s project coordinator described health workers “caring for their neighbors and relatives without adequate protective equipment” — a sentence that describes both a supply failure and an inevitable one, since in a city of two million, an outbreak worker’s patient is often their neighbour.
Why containment resists
Ebola is not difficult to stop in principle. It spreads through contact with infected bodily fluids, not through the air, so every chain of transmission is traceable in theory. It resists containment when health systems cannot absorb the caseload, when communities distrust the responders, when armed groups control the roads, and when there is no vaccine to buy time. Congo has all four conditions simultaneously, plus a displacement population on the move — the most efficient mechanism for seeding new chains. Canada has extended travel restrictions for 60 days. Screening at borders detects cases leaving; it does nothing about transmission arriving.
Ebola cases have reached 8,300 across seven DR Congo provinces, from Ituri, where the outbreak began, to South Ubangi in the northwest.
What determines the next phase
Watch three numbers, not the headline toll. Contact-tracing completion rates in North Kivu: if the percentage of contacts under follow-up for the full 21 days falls, the outbreak is outrunning surveillance. New cases among health workers: they are the earliest and most reliable indicator of undetected community spread, as the MSF infection shows. And the proportion of deaths occurring outside treatment centres: every such death is a body buried without safety protocols and a further transmission event. An epidemic is not contained when the death toll falls — it is contained when cases become visible before they become fatal.
Education Minister Édouard Geffray said "more than a hundred" schools had suffered severe damage since the protests began
France shut more than 400 schools on Friday as a week of lycée protests over teacher shortages, overcrowding and dilapidated buildings collapsed into street violence. Sixty-five education staff have been injured, 40 of them headteachers. Nearly 2,000 people have been arrested, and the government now insists it is policing a disorder crisis rather than answering a student movement.
Lycée students have demonstrated over teacher shortages, overcrowded classrooms and dilapidated buildings — grievances their unions say are well founded.
The scale
Education Minister Édouard Geffray told BFMTV that 1,207 high schools were disrupted or blocked on Thursday, with 65 staff hurt and “more than a hundred” schools severely damaged. The interior ministry put arrests at 1,949 and injuries to police officers at 305, with 1,027 lycées affected and 222 blockaded. At least 30 universities were reportedly blockaded, including campuses in Rennes and Paris. At Nantes’ Nelson Mandela high school, staff evacuated 160 students.
More than 400 French schools were closed Friday as a week-long lycée protest movement spread nationwide.
The government’s framing
Justice Minister Gérald Darmanin told RTL there is “an active and violent minority” involved, adding, “We’re not entirely sure that they are even high school students themselves.” Two-thirds of those arrested have been placed in police custody. “We have gone from high-school student demonstrations to a public order disturbance. When people target buses and set schools on fire, it is no longer simply a protest issue,” he said. Geffray argues the movement was “hijacked,” quoting teachers who told him, “the people in front of me were not my students.”
What the students want
The grievances predate the disorder, and staff endorse them: not enough teachers and support staff, overcrowded classrooms, too few chairs, and buildings falling into disrepair. Geffray conceded early that some demands were “legitimate.” A teacher in Gironde put it plainly: “their demands are the same as ours.” The Union Syndicale Lycéenne called the blockade because, it said, “other student actions, such as petitions or demonstrations, elicit no response from our political leaders.” It deliberately coincided with a public-sector strike against spending cuts; the FSU teachers’ union backed it as a “collective struggle” for public services.
The cost of escalation
Both sides have paid. Teenagers have suffered eye injuries, and one lost his teeth as riot-equipped police moved on crowds largely composed of minors. Police have been hurt. So have headteachers. In Angers, a teacher was seriously injured after being struck on the head with an iron bar — his attackers were reportedly not from the school.
Broken windows and scorched signage at the entrance of a vandalised French high school following student protests
The political layer
The government and hard-right politicians blame the radical left, particularly La France Insoumise, for igniting the unrest — a charge LFI’s leader rejected, saying blame would not address what is driving the demonstrations. Lecornu’s office cited intelligence services in saying the unrest was organised by the radical left. That argument is politically convenient and legally difficult to sustain while the underlying complaints remain unfunded. With presidential elections months away and a 2027 draft budget seeking some €54 billion in savings, the arithmetic is unforgiving: the fix costs money the government has pledged not to spend.
Atiku Abubakar has raised due-process concerns over the continued detention of Nasir El-Rufai and Sheikh Sani Khalifa Zaria, while also saying Nnamdi Kanu’s right to appeal should be respected.
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has renewed concerns over the continued detention of former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai and Islamic cleric Sheikh Sani Khalifa Zaria, while also speaking on the legal battle involving Indigenous People of Biafra leader Nnamdi Kanu.
In his October 1, 2026 Independence Day address, Atiku called for the rule of law to be applied fairly and said the continued detention of El-Rufai and Sheikh Khalifa raised questions about due process that authorities needed to answer.
He then turned to Kanu, saying that following his conviction, his right to pursue a lawful appeal should be respected and that the grievances and divisions surrounding his case should be addressed seriously.
The remarks place three politically sensitive cases within Atiku’s wider argument about civil liberties, judicial processes and the application of the rule of law.
Atiku Renews Questions Over El-Rufai and Sheikh Zaria
Atiku Abubakar has renewed questions over the continued detention of Nasir El-Rufai and Sheikh Sani Khalifa Zaria, saying authorities must address concerns about due process and the rule of law.
Atiku’s latest intervention centres on what he describes as concerns about due process and the fair application of the law.
In his Independence Day speech, he argued that Nigerians should be free to question their leaders, organise peacefully and demand change, before calling for the rule of law to be applied fairly in every case.
His latest comments build on previous interventions involving both men.
In March, Atiku called on security agencies to either release Sheikh Sani Khalifa Zaria or prosecute him in court, arguing at the time that continued detention without trial raised constitutional and human-rights concerns.
He has also previously criticised El-Rufai’s prolonged detention and bail conditions.
Former Kaduna State governor Nasir El-Rufai is facing separate legal proceedings involving alleged financial misconduct and security-related charges, which he contests
The former Kaduna governor was detained in February after honouring an invitation from the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission. Following his release from EFCC custody, the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission confirmed that it had taken him into custody in connection with an ongoing investigation.
The ICPC subsequently arraigned El-Rufai and a co-defendant on corruption and money-laundering charges in March. A Federal High Court ordered that he remain in custody pending consideration of his bail application. He pleaded not guilty.
In April, a Federal High Court in Kaduna granted him bail in the sum of ₦200 million with conditions including two sureties.
El-Rufai also faces a separate case brought by the State Security Service over allegations that he intercepted communications involving National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu.
He was granted ₦100 million bail in that case in May, but a court later rejected his request to vary some of the conditions attached to the bail.
The ICPC has rejected claims that its handling of El-Rufai’s case is politically motivated and said his continued detention was linked to his inability to meet court-approved bail conditions.
El-Rufai has also challenged aspects of his treatment through separate fundamental-rights proceedings. One of those suits was adjourned in September until October 27.
Who Is Sheikh Sani Khalifa Zaria and Why Is He Facing Trial?
Sheikh Sani Khalifa Zaria is a Kaduna-based Islamic cleric whose case became linked to an alleged plot to overthrow President Bola Tinubu’s government.
He was detained in December 2025 after travelling to Abuja in connection with a frozen bank account. Early reporting linked his detention to an alleged ₦2 million transfer from a military officer suspected of involvement in the alleged coup plot.
Atiku criticised the detention in March and called for the cleric to be either released or formally prosecuted. At that point, Punch reported that he had not yet been formally charged before a court.
That situation later changed.
In April, the federal government arraigned six defendants over the alleged coup plot, including a Zaria-based Islamic cleric identified in court reporting as Abdulkadir Sani. The defendants pleaded not guilty to the charges.
Proceedings continued into July, including a dispute over the interpretation of the cleric’s Hausa testimony and whether a statement attributed to him was made voluntarily.
That means the October discussion is no longer simply about detention without any court process; it now also involves an ongoing criminal trial in which the allegations remain contested.
What Atiku Said About Nnamdi Kanu
Atiku also addressed Nnamdi Kanu in the same Independence Day speech.
Atiku Abubakar said Nnamdi Kanu should be allowed to pursue his lawful appeal, while the grievances and divisions surrounding his case should also be addressed
Unlike his comments on El-Rufai and Sheikh Khalifa, Atiku did not use the October 1 address to call for Kanu’s immediate release.
Instead, he focused on Kanu’s right to appeal his conviction.
“Following Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s conviction, his right to lawful appeal must be respected, while the grievances and divisions surrounding his case must be addressed seriously,” Atiku said.
Kanu was convicted by the Federal High Court in Abuja on November 20, 2025, on terrorism-related charges and sentenced to life imprisonment alongside additional prison terms.
On February 4, 2026, he filed an appeal asking the Court of Appeal to overturn the conviction and sentences. His notice of appeal challenged several aspects of the trial and asked the appellate court to set aside the judgment.
The federal government subsequently filed a cross-appeal connected to the case, according to reports in June.
Atiku’s argument, therefore, is that Kanu should be allowed to exhaust the legal appeal process and that the wider political and social grievances connected to his case should not be ignored.
Why Atiku Says Due Process Is the Issue
Atiku’s stated position is not that investigations or prosecutions should simply be abandoned.
His argument is that state institutions must operate within the law while dealing with suspects and convicted persons.
For El-Rufai, Atiku’s concerns have centred on prolonged detention and bail conditions.
For Sheikh Khalifa, his earlier criticism focused on the period during which the cleric was being held without formal prosecution. Since then, Sheikh Khalifa’s case has progressed to court, where the allegations are being contested.
For Kanu, Atiku’s emphasis is different: he says Kanu’s right to appeal an existing conviction must be respected.
Together, the three cases formed part of Atiku’s wider Independence Day argument that political freedom should include respect for lawful dissent, due process and judicial rights.
What the Authorities Have Said
The ICPC has denied that El-Rufai’s detention and prosecution are politically motivated.
The commission has said it is performing its statutory duties and has attributed his continued detention to unresolved court-approved bail conditions.
In Sheikh Khalifa’s case, the federal government has now moved beyond investigation and filed charges connected to the alleged coup plot. The defendants have pleaded not guilty, and proceedings remain before the court.
Kanu’s case is also before the appellate courts after his legal team challenged his November 2025 conviction and sentence.
What Happens Next?
For El-Rufai, attention will remain on the corruption and security-related cases against him, the conditions attached to his bail and the separate rights cases he has filed.
For Sheikh Sani Khalifa Zaria, the focus is now on the ongoing alleged coup trial and whether prosecutors can establish the allegations against him. He and the other defendants have pleaded not guilty.
For Nnamdi Kanu, the next major legal issue is the appeal against his conviction and life sentence.
Atiku’s October 1 intervention therefore links the three cases through a common theme — due process — but they are legally different.
El-Rufai is facing multiple criminal proceedings and disputes over bail. Sheikh Khalifa is now standing trial over allegations linked to the alleged coup plot. Kanu has already been convicted and is challenging that conviction on appeal.
Atiku’s position is that each case should proceed according to law: authorities should answer questions surrounding detention and bail, while Kanu’s lawful right to appeal should be respected.
Global bond markets are under pressure as rising yields push borrowing costs higher across major economies.
Global bond markets are under heavy pressure again, pushing borrowing costs in the United States, Britain, France and Japan to levels not seen in decades.
The selloff intensified on October 1, when the yield on the benchmark 10-year US Treasury briefly reached 5.34% — its highest level since 2002. The yield had already risen by almost 90 basis points during the third quarter, its largest quarterly increase so far this century.
The pressure is not limited to the United States. Britain’s 30-year government bond yield crossed 6% for the first time since 1998, French 10-year borrowing costs reached their highest levels since 2002, while Japanese government bond yields have climbed to multi-decade highs.
For ordinary borrowers, this is more than a story about financial markets. Higher government bond yields can eventually translate into more expensive mortgages, car loans and business financing.
What does a bond selloff actually mean?
Governments and companies sell bonds when they need to borrow money. Investors buy those bonds in exchange for interest payments.
Bond prices and bond yields generally move in opposite directions. When investors sell bonds and their prices fall, the yield — effectively the return demanded by investors — rises.
That matters because government bonds, particularly US Treasuries, are benchmarks used to price borrowing throughout the global financial system. The US 10-year Treasury influences everything from mortgages and corporate debt to emerging-market borrowing and asset valuations.
So when Treasury yields climb sharply, the cost of borrowing can rise far beyond Washington.
Why are investors selling bonds?
There is no single cause behind the latest selloff.
One major concern is inflation. Higher energy prices linked partly to continuing Middle East tensions have renewed fears that inflation could remain elevated, making it harder for central banks to reduce interest rates — and potentially forcing some to tighten monetary policy further.
A bond selloff happens when investors sell bonds, pushing prices lower and yields higher, which can increase borrowing costs across the economy.
Investors are also increasingly concerned about government debt.
The US debt pile has exceeded $40 trillion, while government debt is at or above 100% of economic output in most G7 economies except Germany, according to Reuters. Governments that continue borrowing heavily must issue more bonds, increasing the amount of debt investors are being asked to absorb.
Investors may therefore demand higher yields before agreeing to lend governments money.
AI is playing an unexpected role
The artificial intelligence investment boom has added another unusual source of pressure.
Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft and Oracle have collectively issued around $220 billion in debt in 2026 to finance investments including data centres and AI infrastructure, according to LSEG data cited by Reuters. That is more than double their combined issuance last year.
Heavy corporate borrowing creates more competition for investor’s money.
When governments and some of the world’s largest technology companies are simultaneously seeking huge amounts of capital, investors can demand higher returns before lending.
What does this mean for mortgage borrowers?
Housing is one of the clearest places where higher yields are already being felt.
Freddie Mac reported on October 1 that the average US 30-year fixed mortgage rate had risen to 7.28%, from 7.03% a week earlier. The average 15-year rate stood at 6.60%.
Higher mortgage rates reduce how much house buyers can afford with the same monthly payment.
Borrowers who already secured long-term fixed-rate mortgages are generally protected while those rates remain locked. But people buying new homes, refinancing loans or moving from expiring fixed-rate deals can face substantially higher costs.
Britain provides a striking example. Reuters reported that millions of UK households are expected to see mortgage payments increase as older, cheaper fixed-rate deals expire and borrowers refinance at today’s higher rates.
Car loans and other borrowing could also become more expensive
Mortgages are not the only loans affected.
Rates on new car loans and other forms of fixed-rate consumer borrowing often rise as financial-market interest rates and bank’s own funding costs increase, although the change is not always immediate.
Variable-rate borrowers can feel the impact even faster, particularly when rising bond yields coincide with expectations that central banks will maintain or increase policy rates.
Credit-card rates are somewhat different because they are more closely connected to bank’s prime rates and central-bank policy than directly to long-term Treasury yields.
Businesses face higher financing costs
Companies also borrow money by issuing bonds.
Their interest rate is usually based partly on government bond yields, with an additional premium reflecting the company’s credit risk.
When Treasury yields rise, therefore, businesses issuing new bonds or refinancing existing debt can be forced to pay more.
That could make expensive projects — from factories and energy infrastructure to technology and data centres — harder to justify.
Companies that borrowed heavily when rates were much lower may face particular pressure when those debts mature and have to be refinanced at today’s higher rates.
Governments are borrowers too
Higher yields also mean governments must spend more servicing their debts.
As old bonds mature and governments replace them with newly issued bonds carrying higher interest rates, debt-service costs increase.
That can leave less public money available for infrastructure, healthcare, education or other spending priorities unless governments raise additional revenue, cut expenditure elsewhere or borrow even more.
Reuters reported that major economies now collectively spend more on interest expenses than the world invests individually in AI, defence or clean energy, citing the Institute of International Finance.
Why emerging markets should pay attention
The impact can also spread beyond major developed economies.
US Treasuries are widely treated as a benchmark for global borrowing. When their yields rise significantly, investors may find US dollar assets more attractive compared with riskier investments elsewhere.
That can tighten financial conditions for emerging economies and make refinancing dollar-denominated government or corporate debt more expensive.
For African governments and companies that rely on international debt markets, sustained high US yields can therefore increase the price demanded by global investors when new financing is needed.
Is the selloff over?
Not necessarily.
US yields eased from their October 1 peak later in the trading session, with the 10-year yield falling back towards 5.24% after investors began buying bonds at the higher yields. But market participants told Reuters that the rebound did not necessarily mean the wider selloff had ended.
Much will depend on inflation, energy prices, economic growth, central-bank decisions and whether governments can convince investors that their debt levels remain manageable.
For borrowers, the key issue is straightforward: if bond yields remain elevated, the era of cheap borrowing becomes harder to return to.
The United States is deploying a third aircraft carrier to the Middle East as tensions with Iran rise and Washington increases its military presence in the region.
The United States is significantly expanding its military presence in the Middle East, sending another aircraft carrier strike group and thousands of additional personnel to the region amid renewed tensions with Iran.
The USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group and the USS Makin Island amphibious readiness group are heading to the Middle East carrying more than 7,000 sailors and around 2,000 Marines, according to a US official cited by the Associated Press.
The United States is expanding its military presence in the Middle East as tensions with Iran increase and diplomatic efforts remain uncertain.
If the deployment proceeds as planned, the Theodore Roosevelt could join the USS George H.W. Bush and USS George Washington, potentially leaving three US aircraft carriers operating in or around the region. AP reported that the reinforcement could push the US naval presence there above 20,000 sailors and Marines, alongside hundreds of aircraft.
The buildup comes as President Donald Trump has again raised the possibility of additional military action against Iran following months of conflict and unsuccessful efforts to secure a broader agreement.
Why is the US sending more forces?
The immediate deployment gives Washington additional military options as tensions with Tehran remain unresolved.
The United States and Iran have been engaged in intermittent fighting and negotiations following the US-Israeli military campaign against Iran earlier in 2026. Diplomatic efforts have continued, but the two governments remain divided over the conditions required for a longer-term settlement.
Trump said on October 1 that Iran’s latest proposal did not go far enough and again raised the possibility of renewed US strikes. AP reported that the president suggested further military action could come after the November US midterm elections, although no new strike order has been publicly announced.
The carrier deployment therefore represents a major increase in US military capacity in the region, but it does not by itself confirm that another large-scale attack on Iran is imminent.
Iran warns of a stronger response
Iran, meanwhile, is preparing for the possibility of renewed US attacks.
Reuters reported on October 1 that Iranian military commanders are developing plans for a broader response if Iran is attacked again. Those preparations could involve strikes against US interests and regional allies, according to people familiar with Tehran’s planning cited by the news agency.
Iran has also pursued diplomatic channels.
Reuters reported that Tehran recently presented a regional de-escalation proposal through Qatari mediators. The proposal included demands relating to sanctions and restrictions on Iran in exchange for measures aimed at reducing hostilities. Washington did not accept the proposal.
That leaves both sides attempting diplomacy while simultaneously preparing for the possibility that fighting could intensify.
Why three aircraft carriers matter
Aircraft carriers give the United States the ability to operate large numbers of fighter and surveillance aircraft without relying entirely on land-based airfields.
The Theodore Roosevelt deployment is therefore significant because it adds another mobile airbase and accompanying warships to an already substantial US presence.
AP reported that the US Navy last had three carrier strike groups simultaneously in the Middle East in April 2026, the first time it had maintained that level of carrier presence there since 2003.
The latest deployment also includes the Makin Island group, which carries Marines and amphibious capabilities.
For Washington, the concentration of forces creates additional options ranging from defending US forces and regional partners to conducting air or naval operations should the administration order them.
Economic consequences are already being felt
The tensions are not limited to military developments.
Oil prices climbed sharply on October 1 as traders reacted to the US military buildup alongside tightening global fuel supplies.
Reuters reported that Brent crude rose more than 4% to $102.31 per barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate crude reached $92.87. China’s reported suspension of some fuel exports also contributed to the price increase, meaning the market move cannot be attributed solely to US-Iran tensions.
The Strait of Hormuz remains particularly important because it is one of the world’s major energy shipping routes.
Continued instability in and around the Gulf could therefore affect oil supplies, shipping costs and fuel prices well beyond the Middle East.
Washington increases economic pressure on Tehran
Military pressure is also being accompanied by additional US sanctions.
On October 1, Washington announced sanctions targeting parts of Iran’s automotive and rail industries, as well as companies linked to those sectors outside Iran.
The US Treasury says the measures are intended to restrict revenue that could support Iranian military activities.
Iran has argued that US sanctions harm its economy and civilian population, while critics of broad economic restrictions have also warned about their impact on ordinary Iranians.
So, is the Iran conflict escalating again?
The military picture is clearly changing.
Washington is deploying thousands of additional personnel, another carrier strike group and additional amphibious forces while the US president publicly keeps the possibility of renewed strikes open. Iran, at the same time, is preparing for what Reuters describes as a potentially stronger response if it is attacked.
But the deployments should not be interpreted as proof that a new major offensive has already been decided.
Diplomatic channels remain active, and neither the deployment nor Trump’s comments amount to a publicly confirmed order for a new round of large-scale strikes.
For now, the key developments to watch are whether Washington and Tehran return to substantive negotiations, whether the US announces further military operations, and how Iran responds to the growing American military presence.
The Nigerian Communications Commission has granted Swift Telephone Network Limited a licence to provide telecommunications services in Nigeria.
Swift Telephone Network Limited, STN, has secured a Unified Access Service License (UASL) from the Nigerian Communications Commission, clearing the regulatory path for the Nigerian-owned company to expand into full telecommunications services.
The NCC’s official list of individual licensees confirms that STN’s Unified Access Services licence took effect on October 1, 2026, and runs until September 30, 2036, giving the company a 10-year authorisation.
Under the NCC’s licensing framework, a Unified Access Service Licence allows an operator to provide a range of telecommunications services under one licence, including mobile and fixed telephony, national long-distance and other authorised services.
Swift Telephone Network Limited has received NCC approval to operate telecommunications services in Nigeria, including mobile, voice and data services.
The development gives STN the regulatory foundation to offer voice, data, fixed and mobile telecommunications services, according to reports by The Guardian, THISDAY and Nairametrics.
STN enters a market dominated by MTN and Airtel
STN is entering one of Africa’s largest telecommunications markets, but it will face established operators with tens of millions of active connections.
NCC figures for July 2026 show Nigeria had 195.1 million active telephone subscriptions. MTN accounted for about 100.86 million, representing 51.76% of the market, while Airtel had 66.76 million, or 34.26%. Globacom held 12.13%, while T2 accounted for 1.85%.
That means MTN and Airtel together accounted for roughly 86% of subscriptions in the latest published operator data, highlighting the scale of the challenge facing any new entrant.
STN Chief Executive Officer Oluwole Adetuyi described the licence as the beginning of a new phase for the company.
“This UASL is not just a licence. It is a new chapter.”
Adetuyi said the company plans to build telecommunications infrastructure in Nigeria and increase opportunities for local engineers, technicians, vendors and other businesses in the telecom value chain.
Why the licence matters
The licence gives STN considerably broader operating authority than a company restricted to a single telecommunications service.
Nigeria’s demand for connectivity has also continued to grow. NCC data show that mobile internet subscriptions reached about 157.27 million in July 2026, while broadband subscriptions stood at approximately 124.42 million.
The same NCC figures show that 4G accounted for 54.31% of mobile connections in July, while 5G’s share had risen to 4.74%, illustrating Nigeria’s continuing migration towards higher-speed networks.
For STN, however, obtaining a licence is only one stage of becoming a significant consumer telecom operator.
The company will still have to turn its regulatory approval into commercially available services by deploying or accessing infrastructure, developing distribution channels, acquiring customers and competing against operators with nationwide networks and large subscriber bases.
STN has said it intends to announce strategic partnerships, infrastructure roll out plans and investor engagement programmes as it moves towards commercial operations.
No detailed consumer pricing, SIM roll out timetable or specific launch coverage areas were disclosed in the reports reviewed.
What Nigerian consumers should watch next
The major question is therefore not simply whether STN has permission to operate, but how quickly it can translate that licence into services Nigerians can actually use.
Its next announcements on network infrastructure, coverage, technology partnerships, pricing and commercial launch dates will provide a clearer indication of how aggressively the company intends to compete.
For consumers, another large-scale operator could eventually increase the number of available telecom choices. Whether STN materially changes competition or pricing, however, will depend on the scale and execution of its network roll out rather than the licence alone.
Flydubai Flight FZ1073 diverted to Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, after a violent cockpit incident left the captain injured and triggered an emergency response.
What began as a routine Flydubai flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv turned into a mid-air emergency after the aircraft’s co-pilot allegedly stabbed the captain and attempted to take control of the plane, according to Israeli officials.
Flight FZ1073, carrying 174 people, was travelling over Saudi Arabia on September 30 when the violent confrontation unfolded inside the cockpit. The Boeing 737 plunged more than 14,000 feet in less than 30 seconds, according to flight-tracking data cited by Reuters.
The aircraft eventually landed safely at Tabuk Airport in northwestern Saudi Arabia, after passengers and other Flydubai crew members travelling on the flight intervened.
Flydubai Flight FZ1073 made an emergency diversion to Tabuk after a violent cockpit incident left the captain injured.
What Happened Inside the Cockpit?
Israeli officials said the co-pilot attacked Captain Smit Machchhar, an Indian national, during the flight.
Despite being seriously injured, Machchhar managed to release the cockpit door, allowing passengers and crew to enter and restrain the alleged attacker. A reserve Flydubai crew travelling aboard the aircraft then took control and landed the plane safely in Tabuk.
Passenger Yaniv Hayun, one of those who helped overpower the suspect, said he rushed towards the cockpit as the aircraft descended and helped remove the attacker from the controls. Reuters reported that another passenger, Asaf Rajuan, was left with blood on his forehead following the struggle.
Flydubai itself has confirmed that an “altercation occurred in the flight deck” and said crew members travelling aboard the aircraft intervened to secure it. The airline has cautioned against speculation while investigators establish exactly what happened.
Captain Hospitalised After Attack
Machchhar was taken to hospital in Saudi Arabia following the incident and was reported to be in stable condition.
The Indian Embassy in Riyadh told AP that the captain had been hospitalised and that his family had been updated on his recovery. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi publicly praised his actions during the emergency.
The remaining passengers later continued their journey to Israel aboard a replacement Flydubai aircraft. Reuters reported that they arrived at Ben Gurion Airport more than 10 hours after the emergency diversion.
Who Was the Co-Pilot?
Israeli officials have identified the co-pilot as an Omani national. He was detained in Saudi Arabia following the emergency landing, according to Israeli officials cited by Reuters. Oman had not publicly commented on the case at the time of the reports.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel’s preliminary information suggested the man had undergone Islamist radicalisation and appeared to have intended to bring down the aircraft. Those assessments have not yet been established as final investigative findings.
Two Israeli security officials told Reuters their initial assessment was that the co-pilot likely acted alone, but the investigation remained ongoing.
Was It a Terror Attack?
That remains one of the biggest unanswered questions.
Some Israeli officials have publicly characterised the incident as terrorism, but Flydubai has not assigned a motive. The UAE has also stopped short of reaching that conclusion.
On October 1, the UAE Attorney-General ordered a formal investigation to establish the circumstances and motive, including whether the incident was connected to terrorist activity, involved prior planning or was directed by anyone else.
The UAE General Civil Aviation Authority has officially described what happened as a “security incident” and said investigators are reviewing both operational and security aspects of the event.
There was also no established evidence of Iranian involvement as of October 1. Israeli security officials told Reuters they had identified no such connection, while Netanyahu said it was too early to reach conclusions.
Investigation Now Turns to How It Happened
Beyond the motive, investigators must determine how the attack unfolded inside one of the most restricted areas of a commercial aircraft and reconstruct the sequence that caused FZ1073’s dramatic descent.
The UAE investigation is being conducted with its General Civil Aviation Authority and other relevant authorities. Because the aircraft is registered in the UAE, Emirati authorities say their judicial system has jurisdiction over offences committed aboard it even when the aircraft is outside UAE territory.
For now, several facts are established: a violent cockpit incident occurred, the captain was seriously injured, the aircraft descended sharply, passengers and crew intervened, and the flight landed safely in Saudi Arabia.
What has not yet been conclusively established is the attacker’s motive, whether anyone else was involved or whether authorities will formally classify the incident as terrorism.
The All Progressives Congress won four of five recent legislative by-elections held across Gombe, Kano, Bauchi and Delta states.
The All Progressives Congress has won four of the five legislative by-elections conducted across Gombe, Kano, Bauchi and Delta states, according to results reported following the September 19, 2026 polls.
The elections covered one House of Representatives constituency and four state House of Assembly constituencies.
The Independent National Electoral Commission lists the September 19 elections for the Gombe/Kwami/Funakaye Federal Constituency, Dawakin Kudu State Constituency in Kano, Disina and Sakwa constituencies in Bauchi, and Udu State Constituency in Delta. The contests are also listed on INEC’s Result Viewing portal.
The All Progressives Congress secured four of the five legislative seats contested in recent by-elections across Gombe, Kano, Bauchi and Delta states.
APC Takes Gombe Federal Constituency
In Gombe State, APC candidate Kallamu Usman MaiJama’a won the Gombe/Kwami/Funakaye Federal Constituency election with 41,121 votes.
The Labour Party recorded 3,553 votes, while the Allied Peoples Movement polled 872 votes, according to the results reported by Punch.
The election was held to fill the House of Representatives seat left vacant following the death of the constituency’s former lawmaker, Yaya Bauchi Tongo.
APC Records Wins in Kano and Delta
In Kano, Husseini Yusuf-Datti of the APC won the Dawakin Kudu State Constituency election after receiving 22,890 votes.
His Peoples Redemption Party challenger received 270 votes, while the PDP recorded 108 votes.
In Delta State, APC candidate Okolosi Ator won the Udu State Constituency with 8,724 votes, compared with 214 votes recorded for the PDP.
Bauchi Splits Two Seats Between APC and APM
The two Bauchi State Assembly contests produced different outcomes.
APC candidate Yakubu Ali won the Disina State Constituency with 5,846 votes, ahead of the APM, which received 5,225 votes, and the PRP with 3,701.
But the APC did not sweep Bauchi.
In the Sakwa State Constituency, Adamu Yakubu of the Allied Peoples Movement won with 8,515 votes. The APC received 3,771 votes, the PDP 2,076 and the PRP 727.
The final outcome left the APC with four seats and the APM with one.
INEC Says Polls Offer Operational Lessons
INEC Chairman Joash Amupitan described the multi-state by-elections as important operational exercises from which the commission could draw lessons as it prepares for the 2027 general elections.
The results provide evidence of how voters chose in these five specific constituencies. They should not, by themselves, be treated as a forecast of nationwide voting in the 2027 general elections, where the electorate, candidates and political conditions will be substantially broader.
Nigerians in Libya are facing heightened fear after an unverified October 1 departure warning spread among migrant communities.
Nigerians living in Libya entered October 1, 2026, under a cloud of uncertainty after days of social media warnings, reported arrests and anti-migrant threats prompted some workers to stay home and others to consider leaving the country.
The date had circulated for weeks as an alleged deadline for migrants and foreigners—particularly Africans without valid immigration documents—to leave Libya. But despite the fear surrounding the warning, no publicly verifiable nationwide Libyan government decree establishing October 1 as a compulsory departure date has emerged.Refugees in Libya, a survivor-led migrant rights organisation, described the October 1 deadline as unverified, while warning that the threats surrounding it should not be dismissed. The organisation said social media posts included threats of violence and references to targeting Black migrants in parts of Tripoli.
Nigerians in Libya face growing anxiety as an unverified October 1 departure warning spreads amid reports of arrests and evictions.
Libya Security Monitor separately reported that an anti-foreigner campaign had gained traction online in the run-up to October 1, with posts calling for migrants to leave and some containing hostile or violent rhetoric. It also reported that messages purporting to come from UNHCR were circulating among migrant communities.
don’t Come to Work
For Nigerians on the ground, however, the distinction between an official order and a viral threat has offered little comfort.
Nigerians interviewed by SaharaReporters said some Libyan colleagues had advised them not to report for work on October 1, while some landlords had allegedly asked African tenants to find alternative accommodation. Others reported hearing that African migrants were already being arrested.
One worker said his Libyan colleagues urged him to remain indoors because of the uncertainty surrounding the day.
Another Nigerian resident said the fear had spread beyond undocumented migrants because people could not tell whether any security operation would be limited to those without valid papers.
The accounts have not all been independently verified, but they come against a broader atmosphere of anti-migrant agitation documented by migrant-rights monitors in Libya. Refugees in Libya said some online material went beyond opposition to migration and included explicit threats of violence.
Nigerians Seeking a Way Home
The situation took another turn on Thursday when SaharaReporters quoted the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission as saying it had received numerous requests from Nigerians seeking to return from Libya.
NiDCOM spokesperson Abdur-Rahman Balogun was quoted as saying the commission was “not aware” of the supposed October 1 deadline. He added that the agency had received petitions from Nigerians seeking assistance to return but currently lacked the capacity to bring all of them home.
Nigeria has previously worked with the International Organisation for Migration and other agencies to evacuate stranded citizens from Libya. NiDCOM said earlier that 956 Nigerians were evacuated from Libya during the first three months of 2025 alone.
The Nigerian Embassy in Tripoli also advises Nigerians travelling to or working in Libya to obtain the required work and residence permits and warns of the risks associated with irregular migration.
What Is Verified — and What Is Not?
What remains unverified is crucial: there is still no publicly established evidence in the sources reviewed that the Libyan government issued a nationwide decree ordering all Nigerians—or all foreigners—to leave by October 1.
Warnings circulated online have variously been attributed to international organisations, but the reports themselves do not establish that those messages originated from the organisations whose names were attached to them. Refugees in Libya has instead focused attention on the security threat created by the campaign and called on Libyan authorities to prevent attacks.
What is documented is an increasingly hostile online campaign against migrants and mounting anxiety among Nigerians and other Africans living in Libya.
That leaves October 1 caught between an unverified deadline and a very real security concern.
For Nigerians who have built homes and livelihoods in Libya, the immediate question is no longer simply whether the viral deadline is genuine. It is whether the threats surrounding it will translate into arrests, evictions or violence—and what assistance will be available if they decide they need to leave.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
