Home Blog Page 104

From Wheelchair To World Stage: Stephanie Egharevba’s Inspiring Rise

Before she became a global speaker, accessibility inclusion strategist, youth advocate, and one of the boldest young voices reshaping conversations in Nigeria, Stephanie Egharevba was simply “a very inside type of kid.”

Quiet. Reserved. Protected.

“I wasn’t the type of person you’d meet outside,” Stephanie recalls. “I was a very much an indoors kid because my parents were very protective of me. I was considered a fragile child.”

For much of her early life, the world felt distant, observed mostly from within walls built by caution and care. But fragility, as it turns out, was never Stephanie’s final identity.

“I was very reserved, quiet, even though I did not want to be.”

That line says everything. Because long before Stephanie became a force in disability inclusion, there was already a voice inside her waiting for space.

A Quiet Girl, A Powerful Voice in Waiting

Long before boardrooms, policy rooms, and international platforms, Stephanie imagined a very different future for herself.

According to Stephanie while speaking to LN247 Yemisi Lanre-Idowu on her podcast conversation, ‘Women Who Mean Business’, “the idea was being a spoken word artist,” she says. “That’s what I wanted to be.”

And honestly, that makes sense. Because even before she knew she would one day challenge institutions and influence organizations like the Mastercard Foundation, her mother was already preparing her voice.

From Bible recitations in church to memorizing sermons word for word, Stephanie’s confidence was being shaped intentionally.

“She always challenged me to be in the spotlight… to be able to use my mouth, to talk.”

There was even a time she memorized and publicly delivered an entire New Year message in church, an experience she describes as “very fulfilling.”

At the time, it looked like public speaking. In reality, it was preparation. Not for performance alone. But for purpose.

YABATECH: Where Frustration Became Advocacy

Stephanie’s defining turning point came at Yaba College of Technology, in Lagos Nigeria, where she studied Computer Science.

There, accessibility stopped being theoretical. It became personal. Structural. Immediate.

What first lit the fire was another student’s pain. A fellow young woman with physical disability confided in Stephanie that she had carryovers in all her courses, not because she lacked brilliance, but because her classes were upstairs and physically inaccessible.

“She was not able to go to her classes because her classes were on the top floor.”

Stephanie’s response was visceral.

“This cannot continue.”

Then came an even sharper realization: she was fighting the same system too. For Stephanie, attending lectures often meant physically exhausting climbs, inaccessible buildings, missed tests, and waiting at entrances for others to carry her.

“When I get to the entrance of the building, I have to wait for two guys to come and lift me. It wasn’t a dignifying experience.”

Not difficult. Not inconvenient. Undignified.

And Stephanie refused to normalize that.

“School is already stressful. This that we are going through is unnecessary. We have to level the playing field for everybody.”

So while others stayed silent, Stephanie wrote letters, petitioned authorities, met with deans, and pushed relentlessly.

“It was a struggle. It was a hassle.”

But she persisted. And she won. The classrooms were changed. Another student got her appeal. And Stephanie discovered something powerful: systems can change when someone is willing to confront them.

“You Don’t Thrive on Assumptions”

What began in school became a mission.

Today, Stephanie works at the intersection of digital inclusion, accessibility consulting, social impact, and inclusive design, helping organizations identify where they unintentionally leave people behind.

Her message is direct:

“If you’re doing disability inclusion, you don’t thrive on assumptions. You have to ask questions.”

That one sentence captures her philosophy.

For Stephanie, exclusion often hides in things many businesses overlook: A website that is visually stunning but inaccessible to screen readers. A workplace with opportunity but no accommodation. A product built beautifully for some, but invisibly excluding others.

She challenges organizations to stop assuming accessibility is optional or one-dimensional.

“Just because you put a screen reader there does not mean you have fulfilled disability inclusion.”

Instead, she insists businesses must ask:

“Who is this product excluding?” “Who is being left out?” “Are we building accessibility into the core?”

Because in Stephanie’s world, inclusion is not decoration. It is design.

Working 150% for a Seat at the Table

Stephanie’s rise has not come without resistance. As a woman and a wheelchair user, she understands bias intimately.

“The first thing people see when you come into the room… they start pitying you.”

And for Stephanie, pity has never been the goal.

“If somebody is doing 100%, I have to do 150%.”

That mindset has shaped how she navigates rooms that were not always designed with her in mind. From pushing herself into AI and social impact spaces to demanding disability conversations be included where they are often ignored, Stephanie has learned not to beg for relevance.

“I don’t go into the room begging to be heard anymore. I just go there and say, I want to be heard.”

Simple. Powerful. Earned.

From “Slow Build” to Global Recognition

Stephanie describes her rise not as sudden fame, but “a slow build.”

Event by event. Speech by speech. Post by post.

“My voice started becoming popular.”

She leveraged social media, advocacy, and public speaking to expand her reach until global institutions began to notice.

One major milestone came when Mastercard Foundation invited her to Nairobi to lead critical conversations, validating years of consistent work. But Stephanie’s definition of success remains bigger than visibility.

“Success would mean that there’s a change of mindset.”

Not tokenism. Not optics. Mindset.

“Success would mean the world becoming inclusive… even a hundred percent.”

Faith as Foundation

At the center of Stephanie’s journey is faith. Again and again, she returns to one truth:

“This is not for me. This is for God.”

For her, disability inclusion is not a trend. It is purpose. It is assignment. It is divine responsibility.

“God does not want a world where people are being sidelined, people are being excluded.”

This belief shapes everything she does. When burnout comes, she leans deeper.

“God, I’m tired… He’s my strength.”

And perhaps that is what makes Stephanie’s advocacy different. It is deeply strategic, yes. But also deeply spiritual.

The Legacy Stephanie Egharevba Is Building

Ten years from now, Stephanie wants to be remembered as “someone who was helped by God, fulfilling her purpose.” And honestly, that legacy is already unfolding.

A once “fragile child.” A once “indoors type of kid.” Now a woman breaking doors open for others. She is proving, boldly and repeatedly, that accessibility is not pity.

“It’s not charity… its dignity.”

That inclusion is not performative. It is justice. And that people with disabilities should not be “looked at from the perspective of being pitied.”

“You have to see yourself the way God sees you.”

Stephanie Egharevba is no longer waiting quietly indoors. She is in the room. She is changing the room. And with every speech, strategy, and system she challenges, she is making one thing unmistakably clear:

“We have to level the playing field for everybody.”

The 2027 Playbook: Strategy, Survival and the Fight for Aso Rock

As Nigeria continues to grapple with economic reforms, rising living costs and governance concerns, the political class appears to have shifted attention toward another major contest, the 2027 general election.

Although the next presidential election is still ahead, political maneuvering across party lines has intensified, with growing conversations around President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s second-term bid, opposition coalition talks, internal party tensions, and renewed zoning debates.

From strategic meetings in Abuja to quiet consultations among governors and influential political blocs, the battle for Nigeria’s political future has already begun.

Tinubu’s Second-Term Positioning

The ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), is now confirmed with his supporters arguing that his administration’s economic reforms; the fuel subsidy removal and foreign exchange policy adjustments, are long-term corrective measures designed to stabilize Nigeria’s economy. They believe that if economic conditions improve before 2027, the President could campaign on the foundation of “difficult but necessary reforms.”

Political observers also point to the traditional advantages of incumbency in Nigerian politics:

  • Control of party structures
  • Influence within federal institutions
  • Strategic appointments
  • Strong relationships with governors and political stakeholders

However, critics argue that persistent inflation, unemployment concerns, rising food prices and public frustration could become significant political vulnerabilities if living conditions fail to improve substantially.

The key question remains: will Nigerians judge this administration based on reform intentions or present-day realities?

Opposition Coalition Talks Gain Momentum

Across opposition circles, discussions around possible alliances and coalition platforms are beginning to attract attention.

Elements within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the Labour Party, ADC, NDC and smaller political blocs are reportedly exploring strategies that could prevent another fragmented opposition outing in 2027.

Many analysts believe the opposition understands one central reality: divided opposition often strengthens the ruling party.

Still, major obstacles remain.

Questions continue to emerge around:

  • Who would lead a united coalition?
  • Whether personal ambitions can be set aside
  • Ideological differences among political actors
  • Regional balancing and zoning considerations
  • Trust among party stakeholders The Atiku and Obi Factor

Two major opposition figures remain central to the conversation: Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi.

Atiku retains strong political networks and longstanding influence, particularly within northern political structures. Supporters view him as one of Nigeria’s most experienced political operators.

However, critics question whether the country may be moving toward a generational political shift.

On the other hand, Peter Obi has continue to command significant youth support and digital political engagement following the 2023 elections. Analysts say his challenge moving forward may involve translating urban enthusiasm and social media influence into broader nationwide political structures capable of competing across all regions.

Whether both figures can align politically or whether their supporters can accept compromise, may become one of the defining questions ahead of 2027.

Governors Remain Powerful Political Actors

Nigeria’s governors are expected to play a decisive role in shaping the next electoral cycle.

Historically, governors influence:

  • Delegate selection
  • Party structures
  • Campaign financing
  • Regional political negotiations
  • Grassroots mobilization

Within the APC, observers are watching closely for possible cracks within the Governors Forum and wider party hierarchy.

While public unity largely remains intact, political analysts note that internal disagreements over succession plans, regional interests and future ambitions could gradually emerge as 2027 approaches.

Zoning Debate Returns to the National Stage

Another issue likely to dominate political conversations is zoning, the informal power-sharing arrangement between the North and South.

Some political stakeholders argue that the South should retain the presidency until 2031 in the interest of fairness and continuity.

Others believe economic realities and political strategy may outweigh zoning considerations, especially if parties believe alternative regional calculations improve electoral chances.

The debate once again raises broader national questions:

  • Does zoning strengthen national unity?
  • Does it weaken merit-based leadership selection?
  • Can Nigeria move beyond ethnic and regional politics?
  • Or is zoning still necessary for political stability? Governance Versus Politics

For many Nigerians, perhaps the biggest concern is whether early political campaigning could overshadow governance priorities.

At a time when citizens continue to face economic hardship, insecurity concerns and infrastructure challenges, critics warn that excessive political maneuvering may distract leaders from addressing urgent national issues.

Supporters of early political engagement, however, argue that political planning is a normal feature of democratic systems and necessary for party stability.

The Road to 2027

Although the election season has not officially begun, Nigeria’s political atmosphere already suggests that strategic calculations are underway across party lines.

What remains uncertain is whether the next election cycle will be driven primarily by:

  • Personalities,
  • Regional loyalties,
  • Coalition politics,

Or concrete policy debates around governance and economic recovery.

As alliances shift and political camps reorganize, one thing appears increasingly clear: the road to 2027 may be longer, louder and more competitive than many expected

Iran War Not Over Yet, Uranium Must Be Removed — Netanyahu

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the conflict involving Iran cannot be considered over until Tehran’s enriched uranium stockpile is removed and its nuclear facilities are dismantled. His remarks come amid ongoing global attention on the Iran-US-Israel tensions and growing debate over how the crisis may eventually end.

Netanyahu made the comments during an interview aired Sunday on CBS News’ “60 Minutes,” where he stressed that Iran’s nuclear capabilities remain a major concern despite recent military developments.

“It’s not over, because there’s still nuclear material enriched uranium that has to be taken out of Iran. There’s still enrichment sites that have to be dismantled,” Netanyahu said.

When asked how the uranium could be removed, the Israeli leader replied, “You go in and you take it out.”

He also claimed that US President Donald Trump shares a similar position on the issue.

“I’m not going to talk about military means, but the president, what President Trump has said to me ‘I want to go in there.’”

Netanyahu’s comments appeared to differ from Trump’s public stance on the ongoing conflict.

The 79-year-old Republican, who is facing mounting domestic pressure to bring the Iran war to an end, has repeatedly maintained that Iran’s nuclear programme has already been contained.

In an interview aired Sunday with independent journalist Sharyl Attkisson, Trump stated that Iran had already suffered military defeat and insisted the uranium could be removed whenever the US decides.

“We’ll get that at some point, whenever we want. We’ll have it surveilled,” Trump said.

“If anybody got near the place we will know about it and we’ll blow them up.”

Netanyahu Prefers Agreement Over Military Action

While discussing possible solutions, Netanyahu said he would rather see the issue resolved through an agreement than through force.

“I think it can be done physically. That’s not the problem. If you have an agreement and you go in and you take it out, why not? That’s the best way.”

However, he avoided directly discussing possible military operations or timelines regarding the removal of Iran’s uranium stockpile.

Israeli PM Wants Gradual End To US Military Aid

Netanyahu also addressed Israel’s long-standing military support from the United States, saying he has already informed Trump that he would like US military aid to Israel to eventually end.

Israel currently receives about $3.8 billion annually in military assistance from the United States.

“I think that it’s time that we wean ourselves from the remaining military support” from the Pentagon, he said. “Let’s start now, and do it over the next decade.”

Netanyahu Raises Concerns Over Iran’s Regional Influence

Beyond the nuclear issue, Netanyahu said Iran still poses wider regional threats through its missile programme and support for armed groups across the Middle East.

“There’s still proxies that Iran supports, their ballistic missiles that they still want to produce. Now, we’ve degraded a lot of it, but all that is still there and there’s work to be done.”

He also alleged that China continues to provide support to Iran, particularly in missile manufacturing.

“China gives a certain amount of support (to Iran), and particular components of missile manufacturing,” Netanyahu stated. “But I can’t say more than that.”

Netanyahu Speaks On Possibility Of Iranian Regime Collapse

The Israeli leader further suggested that the collapse of Iran’s current government could weaken groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis.

He described Iran as the foundation of a broader network of allied groups in the region.

“The whole scaffolding of the terrorist proxy network that Iran built collapses if the regime in Iran collapses.”

Still, Netanyahu stopped short of predicting whether such a political change in Iran would happen.

“Is it possible? Yes. Is it guaranteed? No.”

Trump Insists US-Iran Ceasefire Holds Despite Strait Of Hormuz Clash

United States President Donald Trump has said the ceasefire between the US and Iran remains in effect despite renewed military exchanges in the Strait of Hormuz, with both nations accusing each other of initiating the confrontation.

The US military claimed Iran launched missiles, drones, and small boats at three American warships in what it described as an “unprovoked attack.” Reacting to the incident, Trump said Iran had “trifled with us today.”

On the other hand, Iran’s top military command accused the US of targeting an Iranian oil tanker and another vessel near the Strait of Hormuz, while also carrying out “aerial attacks” on several coastal communities.

The latest tensions emerged barely a day after Iran’s foreign ministry disclosed that it was considering a US proposal aimed at ending the ongoing conflict.

Meanwhile, the United Arab Emirates confirmed on Friday that its air defence systems intercepted a missile and drone attack launched from Iran.

The UAE Ministry of Defence said two ballistic missiles and three UAVs were intercepted, adding that the incident resulted in three “moderate injuries.”

Iranian state media earlier reported “explosions” in the Strait of Hormuz, describing the development as an “exchange of fire” involving the “enemy.” Local reports also indicated that explosions were heard in Tehran.

In a statement, Iran’s top military command alleged that US “aerial attacks” targeted the coastal areas of Bandar Khamir, Sirik and Qeshm Island.

The statement added that Iranian forces responded by attacking US military vessels and claimed to have inflicted “significant damage,” accusing Washington of committing “a violation of the ceasefire.”

However, the US Central Command (CENTCOM) insisted that the Iranian strikes were “unprovoked,” saying Iranian forces launched “multiple missiles, drones and small boats” at US Navy guided-missile destroyers transiting through the strait.

CENTCOM stated that American forces successfully neutralised incoming threats and carried out strikes on Iranian military facilities allegedly linked to the attack.

“Centcom does not seek escalation but remains positioned and ready to protect American forces,” the statement read.

Reacting on Truth Social, Trump claimed the US destroyed several Iranian boats, missiles and drones, adding that “great damage” had been inflicted on the attackers.

The US president also warned Iran against delaying a peace agreement.

“Just like we knocked them out again today, we’ll knock them out a lot harder, and a lot more violently, in the future, if they don’t get their Deal signed, FAST!” Trump wrote.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi criticised the US response in a statement posted on X.

“Every time a diplomatic solution is on the table, the US opts for a reckless military adventure.”

He added, “Whatever the causes, the outcome is the same: Iranians never bow to pressure and diplomacy is always the victim.”

An Israeli source also told the BBC that there was “no Israeli involvement” in the latest escalation.

The renewed tensions come despite recent comments by Trump suggesting the conflict in Iran could soon end.

According to reports by Axios, the White House is believed to be close to securing a 14-point memorandum of understanding with Iran, which could pave the way for broader nuclear negotiations.

Iran’s foreign ministry had earlier confirmed that the proposal was under review and said Tehran would communicate its position through Pakistani mediators.

Pakistan’s foreign minister said efforts were ongoing to turn the current ceasefire into a permanent resolution to the conflict.

However, Iranian lawmaker Ebrahim Rezaei dismissed the proposed memorandum as a “wish list.”

Rezaei warned that Iran “has its finger on the trigger” and threatened a “harsh and regret-inducing response” if the US failed to “surrender and grant necessary conditions.”

Both Washington and Tehran have continued to issue warnings of further escalation if negotiations collapse.

In an earlier Truth Social post on May 6, Trump warned that if Iran failed to agree to a deal, “the bombing starts, and it will be, sadly, at a much higher level and intensity than it was before.”

Trump had also previously stated that Operation Epic Fury, the initial US-Israeli offensive in Iran would end once Iran accepted agreed conditions. Before then, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the operation had achieved its objectives.

Trump further claimed that Iran had agreed not to pursue nuclear weapons “among other things,” although Tehran has not officially confirmed the assertion.

UAE Says Iranian Missile and Drone Attack Injures Three People

The United Arab Emirates on Friday confirmed that an Iranian missile and drone attack on the country left three people moderately injured.

According to the UAE Ministry of Defence, the country’s air defence systems intercepted multiple aerial threats launched from Iran.

“The UAE air defence systems engaged 2 ballistic missiles and 3 UAVs launched from Iran, resulting in 3 moderate injuries,” the defence ministry said on X.

The latest incident marks one of several missile and drone attacks the UAE says it has experienced from Iran this week. It is also the first reported wave of attacks since a ceasefire between the parties came into effect last month.

Iran had earlier denied responsibility for the recent attacks targeting the UAE.

How Politics Has Kept Nigeria In Darkness

For decades, Nigeria has been described as a nation rich in energy resources but poor in electricity supply. That is a contradiction that continues to define everyday life for millions of citizens. According to reports on Africa’s energy crisis, nearly 600 million Africans still lack reliable electricity access, with Nigeria contributing significantly to that figure.

How Africa’s largest oil producer still struggles to keep the lights on, while homes, hospitals, schools, and businesses rely heavily on generators to survive… is still unthinkable.

The crisis used to be just about infrastructure failure. But that is no longer the case and the issue has become deeply political.

Nigeria’s energy problem is also not caused by a lack of natural resources since it possesses vast reserves of crude oil, natural gas, hydro resources, and abundant sunlight capable of powering entire regions. The real issue lies in how politics has shaped and in many cases distorted the management of these resources.

For years, power projects have often been treated as political trophies rather than long-term national investments. Successive administrations have launched ambitious electrification plans with promises of stable power, but many projects either stall, become abandoned, or fail to deliver expected results after billions of Naira have already been spent.

One major challenge is policy inconsistency. Every new administration tends to introduce new reforms while quietly abandoning the priorities of the previous government. As a result, long-term energy planning becomes impossible. Investors lose confidence, projects slow down, and Nigerians remain trapped in a cycle of unreliable electricity.

Corruption has also played a significant role in weakening the sector. Over the years, allegations of inflated contracts, poorly executed transmission projects, and questionable privatization processes have repeatedly surfaced. Not to forget the thriving Power-Generating machine Industry.

Despite enormous public spending, the national grid remains fragile and prone to collapse.

Nigeria’s national grid suffered multiple collapses in 2024, with reports showing at least 9 to 12 grid failures within the year alone and despite having an estimated generation capacity of about 13,000MW, Nigeria’s grid reportedly distributes only about one-third effectively, forcing millions to depend on generators.

The 2013 privatization of Nigeria’s power sector was initially presented as the turning point that would transform electricity generation and distribution. Instead, many Nigerians argue that it merely transferred public monopolies into private hands without solving the underlying structural problems. Distribution companies continue to struggle with outdated infrastructure, estimated billing, and poor customer service, while generation companies complain of debt and inadequate gas supply. BusinessDay reported that Nigeria’s power privatization has struggled due to structural weaknesses, including revenue losses, poor metering, and political interference with only about 55% of customers being metered as of third Quarter of 2025.

Politics also affects where and how electricity projects are distributed. In some cases, energy infrastructure is concentrated in politically strategic areas while rural communities remain neglected. This imbalance has widened inequality between urban and rural populations, leaving millions disconnected from economic opportunities that reliable electricity could provide.

Even Nigeria’s abundant gas resources have not translated into stable power generation. Gas pipelines are vulnerable to vandalism, regulatory bottlenecks, and political disputes between federal and state actors. Meanwhile, fuel subsidy politics have historically diverted attention and funding away from sustainable electricity development.

However, there are signs of change.

The signing of the Electricity Act in 2023 marked a major shift by allowing states to generate, distribute, and regulate electricity independently. For the first time in decades, states now have the legal framework to develop localized power solutions outside the federal grid structure. In 2024, Nigeria’s Federal Government subsidy obligation in the power sector reportedly reached ₦1.949 trillion due to below-cost tariffs and market inefficiencies.

However, states like Lagos, Enugu, and Kaduna are now exploring independent energy markets and renewable power projects. Across the country, solar mini-grids are bringing electricity to communities that the national grid failed to reach for decades. In markets, schools, and rural towns, decentralized energy systems are proving that smaller, community-based solutions may succeed where centralized systems struggled.

Still, the future of Nigeria’s power sector depends on more than legislation. It requires political will, transparency, and continuity.

Until governance becomes more consistent, accountable, and future-focused, darkness may continue to define a country blessed with more than enough energy to light up the continent.

Zoe McDarlington

Arsenal’s Double Dream: History Within Reach

After booking their place in the UEFA Champions League final, Arsenal FC has turned a strong season into a potentially historic one. Mikel Arteta’s side are now in contention for both Europe’s biggest prize and the Premier League title, a combination that would mark one of the greatest campaigns in the club’s history.

The question is no longer whether Arsenal are good enough. It is whether they can hold their nerve across two very different battles: a long domestic grind and a single, defining European night.

The Champions League: One Game, No Margins

Reaching the final after eliminating Atlético Madrid has confirmed Arsenal’s status as genuine contenders in Europe. Their run has been built on discipline, tactical control, and an ability to win tight matches, a trait that separates hopefuls from champions.

But the final is a different kind of test. Awaiting them is either Paris Saint-Germain or Bayern Munich, both seasoned at this level, both capable of punishing even the smallest mistake.

For Arsenal, it comes down to execution. In a one-off final, form and momentum matter, but experience and composure often decide the outcome. They have the talent to win it. Whether they have the calmness required on the biggest stage remains the defining question.

The Premier League: Control, but No Comfort

Domestically, Arsenal’s position is stronger, but not secure. They sit at the top of the Premier League table and largely control their own fate. Win their remaining matches, and the title is theirs.

However, Manchester City remains a constant threat. With their experience of title run-ins and a squad built for high-pressure moments, City are more than capable of capitalizing on any slip.

This is where the challenge sharpens. The league demands consistency over weeks, not moments. One dropped result could undo months of work, especially with rivals still within reach.

Pressure, Fatigue, and Fine Margins

Pursuing both trophies at once introduces a different kind of difficulty. It is not just about tactics or talent, it is about endurance. Squad rotation becomes critical, but so does maintaining rhythm.

There is also the mental side. Every match carries added weight. Every decision is magnified. For a team chasing a historic double, pressure is not occasional, it is constant.

Arteta’s squad has shown resilience throughout the season, but the final stretch will test their depth and mentality more than any phase before it.

What History Awaits

If Arsenal succeeds, the rewards are enormous. It would be their first-ever Champions League title and their first league crown in over two decades, a defining achievement for this generation of players.

More than that, it would cement this team’s place in football history. Winning one trophy is difficult. Winning both requires near perfection.

Arsenal have put themselves in the best possible position. The Premier League is within their control, while the Champions League is just one game away.

But the reality is clear. One competition demands consistency. The other demands brilliance on a single night.

Arsenal can do both. The real challenge is doing them at the same time, when every match feels like a final.

Let Go Of The Fillers, Own Your Voice

Hey there… Zoe here.

First of all, let me say I am very excited at the progress we are making. On the surface, it looks like we are taking baby steps, but I promise you that as we keep applying and imbibing them on a regular basis, these steps are total game changers for how you present and communicate.

So let’s take it a step further and I’d like to ask you this.

Have you ever listened to a recording of yourself speaking?

Not reading the news and not presenting on camera… I mean just you in a normal conversation with a friend, a colleague or a family member.

If you have, chances are, you noticed something. There were probably lots of “um…”, “you know…, “so… or even “like… like… like…”

For others it might be words or phrases like…” you get me…” ,”do you understand…”,”basically…”… and the list goes on…

And yes, you probably sound like that…..

Welcome to what I’d like to call… “Filler Word Syndrome.’

It’s more widespread than you think and you may not even realise how much of filler words they use in their day-to-day communication.

Filler words are those little sounds or words we use, often unconsciously, when we’re thinking about what to say next. It’s our brains trying to find the next word to say, which is relevant to the subject of discussion. These words don’t add any meaning to your message; they just fill the space while your brain is trying to catch up.

Now, I am not saying that using filler words are bad, but they just take away from your presentation and make it less meaningful than it should be. And since we are aspiring to be the best in the art of presentation and communication, it will serve us to reduce or even eliminate filler words in our conversations

So, why do we use filler words so much?

Well, firstly, we are thinking while speaking. Now, unlike writing, where you can pause and edit, speaking happens in real time. So your brain is processing and producing at the same time.

Secondly, we are trying to eliminate Silence. Experiencing a pause when we talk can feel very awkward, so instead of pausing, we seek to fill those gaps with something.

And thirdly, we want to sound fluent and in control. We try to “keep talking” so we don’t lose flow. Sadly, these filler words make us sound less mature and not very much in control.

The thing about filler words is that they make you sound less confident, break the flow of your message, distract your listeners, and sometimes make you annoying to listen to and harder to understand.

So, how do we start reducing them? Well, I have good News for you.

You probably won’t “eliminate” filler words overnight. But there are intentional steps you can take to get rid of them and own your voice. You just need to become aware of them and then replace them with something better.

So what we are going to do is to pay greater attention to our speech. Even better is that we record ourselves during a normal conversation or when we are explaining something. We then listen back to our recording and identify what our specific ‘filler words’ are and how frequently we used them in a sentence or phrase.

Next, we Replace Filler Words with Silence. I know that sounds counter-intuitive and uncomfortable, but it works. So instead of saying “I think we should try“ Umm… …say this instead… “I think we should try:…[pause]….

You see that pause?… Instead of making you sound awkward, it actually makes you sound more thoughtful and in control.

Next, Slow Down Your Speech. A lot of filler words come from rushing, and so your brain is trying to keep up… and in the process throws ‘filler words’ in as a buffer. But when you slow down, even slightly, you give yourself time to think and speak more clearly.

Lastly, practice Structured Thinking. That means, before you speak, especially in important moments, take a second to organize your thoughts by determining your main point. That simple step reduces the need to “figure things out” while talking.

Here’s something I want you to remember. Verbal Fluency is not about speaking fast but about speaking clearly, calmly, and intentionally. And the moment you start replacing noise with intention, your communication level shifts immediately.

This Week’s Practice Tip:

Today, try this simple exercise:

In one conversation, consciously replace every “um…” (your filler word…) with a short pause. It may feel strange at first… but listen to how much more confident you begin to sound. Before long, filler words will be absent from your vocabulary.

Please let me know in the comments what your most common filler word is. We all have one or two.

I’ll see you soon, till then, keep it simple, keep it clear, and own your voice.

Love,

Zoe McDarlington

City’s Title Push Stutters As Chelsea’s Season Slips Further Into Crisis

The latest round of Premier League action delivered two contrasting storylines at opposite ends of the table. Manchester City saw their title charge hit a frustrating bump after dropping points against lower opposition, raising fresh questions about their ability to chase down Arsenal. Meanwhile, Chelsea continued their alarming slide in form, with another defeat deepening concerns over their chances of securing a place in next season’s Champions League.

Manchester City stumble, but title hopes remain alive

Manchester City’s push for the Premier League title suffered a setback after they were held to a draw by Everton, a result that underlined how even the league’s strongest side can struggle against lower-ranked opposition.

City entered the match as clear favourites and title contenders, but Everton proved difficult to break down, capitalising on moments to disrupt the champions’ rhythm. The dropped points come at a crucial stage of the season, where every result carries weight in the race against Arsenal.

Despite the slip, City remain firmly in contention. Current standings show Arsenal leading the table with 76 points, while City sit second on 71, still within reach if results swing in their favour in the final fixtures.

However, the draw raises concerns. Against a mid-table Everton side, City’s inability to fully control the game highlights fatigue, pressure, and the fine margins that could ultimately decide the title. With only a handful of matches left, their margin for error is now minimal; any further slip could hand the advantage decisively to Arsenal.

Chelsea’s crisis deepens after historic losing streak

Chelsea FC is in far more troubling territory. Their 3–1 defeat to Nottingham Forest marked their sixth consecutive Premier League loss, their worst run in over three decades.

The performance itself reflected a team lacking cohesion—overrun in midfield, fragile defensively, and blunt in attack. Even at Stamford Bridge, Chelsea were second-best to a Forest side fighting relegation, with Taiwo Awoniyi scoring twice in a dominant away display.

This poor run extends beyond just results. Chelsea have gone 13 matches without a clean sheet and only managed to end a long scoring drought with a late consolation goal in this match. The broader picture is one of a club in decline, with fans leaving games early and frustration growing around the team’s direction.

Champions League hopes hanging by a thread

Chelsea’s defeat has also dealt a major blow to their hopes of qualifying for next season’s UEFA Champions League. They currently sit 9th in the table with 48 points, well outside the top four positions required for qualification.

While mathematically not impossible, the reality is harsh: with only a few games remaining and a six-game losing streak ongoing, Chelsea would need a dramatic turnaround and favourable results elsewhere to climb back into contention. Reports suggest the defeat to Forest has “hurt their chances” significantly, reinforcing how unlikely qualification now appears.

Two clubs, two very different pressures

The contrast could not be sharper. Manchester City are battling pressure at the top, where even a draw feels costly, yet still have control over their destiny if they can respond strongly. Chelsea, meanwhile, are fighting a different battle entirely: restoring form, identity, and credibility before the season slips further away.

For City, the question is whether they can maintain consistency under pressure. For Chelsea, it is whether their season can be salvaged at all.

FG Plans Evacuation Flights For Nigerians In South Africa

0

The Federal Government has begun arrangements for the voluntary repatriation of Nigerians residing in South Africa following renewed xenophobic attacks against foreign nationals in the country.

In a statement issued on Sunday, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, disclosed that President Bola Tinubu has directed that evacuation flights be made available for citizens willing to return home.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu explained that efforts are already underway to compile details of affected Nigerians, revealing that about 130 individuals have registered so far with Nigeria’s diplomatic mission in South Africa.

She noted that the figure is expected to increase as Nigerian community groups continue to assist in the registration process.

The minister described the attacks as a “repetitive wave”, alleging that anti-foreigner groups sometimes exploit such tensions for political advantage.

“Nigerian lives and businesses in South Africa must not continue to be put at risk,” she said.

She added that the Nigerian government is actively engaging South African authorities to address the situation, pointing out that both countries recently signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) focused on early warning systems to safeguard citizens during periods of tension.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu also urged leaders of Nigerian associations in South Africa to urgently compile lists of citizens who wish to return home but lack the financial means to do so.

According to her, the Nigerian consulate is working closely with the High Commission in Pretoria to gather necessary data for the arrangement of a special evacuation flight.

She further explained that Nigerians interested in the repatriation programme are required to submit personal details, including passport photographs, full name, passport biodata page, state of origin, local government area, place of birth, current address, and contact information, along with proof of circumstances that qualify them for evacuation.

The minister emphasised that registration for the repatriation exercise is free.