Home Blog Page 76

Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Sowore Over Absence At Cybercrime Trial

0

The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the arrest of activist and African Action Congress (AAC) presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, after he failed to appear for proceedings in his ongoing cybercrime case.

Justice Mohammed Umar issued the arrest warrant on Tuesday following an application by the Department of State Services (DSS), which is prosecuting the matter. The court also revoked the bail previously granted to Sowore.

The activist is standing trial on a two-count charge arising from social media posts in which he referred to President Bola Tinubu as a “criminal” while responding to remarks made by the president on corruption during an international engagement.

Sowore, who has been representing himself since the withdrawal of his legal team, was scheduled to begin presenting his defence. However, he did not appear in court and instead sent a letter stating that he had travelled to Lagos in search of new legal representation.

Prior to the latest development, Sowore had questioned the neutrality of the trial judge and requested that the case be reassigned to a different court. He argued that certain actions during earlier proceedings raised concerns about fairness and influenced his lawyers’ decision to withdraw from the case.

The DSS maintains that the social media posts breached provisions of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024. Prosecutors argue that the statements were capable of inciting public disorder and harming the reputation of the president.

Sowore pleaded not guilty when he was arraigned in December 2025 and has consistently challenged the allegations against him.

Court Rejects Yahaya Bello’s Request To Dismiss ₦110 Billion Fraud Case

0

A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Abuja has dismissed an application filed by former Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Adoza Bello, seeking to strike out the criminal charge brought against him in Charge No. FCT/CR/778/2024: FRN v. Yahaya Adoza Bello & 2 Ors.

Bello, through his lead counsel, J.B. Daudu, SAN, alongside a team of senior advocates, had asked the court to nullify the 16-count charge, arguing that the court lacked territorial jurisdiction to hear the matter.

He also maintained that the case amounted to an abuse of court process because a related case, Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/98/2024, is currently pending before the Federal High Court.

In response, counsel to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, urged the court to dismiss the application, describing it as misconceived and a deliberate attempt to delay the trial.

Pinheiro argued that the offences listed in the charge were based on provisions of the Penal Code and were therefore properly within the jurisdiction of the FCT High Court.

He further submitted that several of the properties allegedly acquired with proceeds from the offences are located in Abuja, thereby giving the court territorial jurisdiction over the case.

Addressing the allegation of abuse of court process, the EFCC lawyer argued that the charges before the two courts involve different offences.

According to him, the matter before the FCT High Court relates to allegations of criminal breach of trust and conspiracy under the Penal Code, while the case before the Federal High Court concerns alleged money laundering offences under the Money Laundering Act.

He also noted that the parties involved in both cases are not the same, explaining that Bello is the sole defendant in the Federal High Court matter, whereas the FCT High Court case includes two additional co-defendants.

Delivering ruling on June 16, 2026, Justice Annenih agreed with the EFCC’s arguments and held that the court has the legal authority to hear the case and that the proceedings do not amount to an abuse of court process.

The court consequently dismissed Bello’s application.

A similar application filed by the third defendant in the case was also dismissed on the grounds that it lacked merit.

Following the ruling, Justice Annenih directed that the trial should proceed, with the prosecution moving ahead to present its 16th witness (PW16), who was already in court and prepared to testify.

The Strait Of Hormuz: A Geological Marvel

Before the Strait of Hormuz became one of the most important waterways in the world, it was simply a place where people lived and worked along the water.

 On one quiet morning, as the sun begins to rise over the coastline, a fisherman prepares his boat the way he has done for most of his life.

His name is Ahmed.

For him, this is not a strategic shipping route or a place that appears in global headlines. It is the sea he has always known. It is where he earns his living, where he learned from his father, and where he hopes his children will one day learn the same skills.

Every day, before most of the world wakes up, Ahmed pushes his boat away from the shore and heads into the water.

It is a simple routine, repeated over years, almost without change.

But while life here feels steady and familiar to him, the waters he moves across are part of something far larger than daily life on the coast.

As Ahmed travels further out, fishing boats give way to much larger vessels in the distance. 

Tankers begin to appear on the horizon, moving slowly but steadily through the narrow passage of water that connects the Persian Gulf to the open sea.

These ships carry oil and natural gas, resources that power cities and industries thousands of kilometres away. Nearly a quarter of the world’s seaborne oil passes through this very route.

For the world, this is a place of global importance, where even small disruptions can have wide-reaching consequences.

But beneath both of these realities—the quiet life of fishing communities and the constant movement of global trade—there is a deeper story that most people never see.

It is not a story about modern commerce or politics.

It is a story written by the Earth itself, shaped over millions of years by forces still at work today.

And to understand the Strait of Hormuz properly, we have to look far beyond the present moment and begin with the land beneath it.

Today on space.com we deal with The Strait Of Hormuz: A Geological Marvel. I am your host, gimalo-angel olowogoke.

==========

More Than A Shipping Lane

The Strait of Hormuz sits between Iran to the north and Oman to the south, forming a narrow connection between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, which eventually opens into the Arabian Sea.

At first glance, it appears to be just a small stretch of water on the map. But its importance to the world is anything but small.

Every day, large vessels carrying crude oil and liquefied natural gas pass through this passage, linking major energy-producing regions with global markets.

Because the Strait is so narrow, it becomes a critical point in global trade. Any delay or disruption here does not remain local; it spreads quickly, affecting supply chains and economies far beyond the region.

Yet what makes the Strait of Hormuz truly interesting is not only what passes through it today, but why this narrow gap exists in the first place.

To understand that, we need to move away from ships and maps, and go much deeper—beneath the surface of the Earth itself.

There, hidden from view, is a long and powerful story that began millions of years ago, when the land around this region was shaped by slow but constant movement deep within the planet.

That movement is still happening today, and it is the reason the Strait of Hormuz exists at all.

A Very Different Earth

To understand why the Strait of Hormuz exists, we have to go back to a time when this entire region looked completely different.

There were no modern coastlines, no Persian Gulf as we know it today, and certainly no narrow strait connecting two bodies of water.

Instead, this area was once part of a vast ancient ocean that stretched across a much larger region. Scientists often refer to it as the Tethys Ocean.

For millions of years, this ocean covered the space between large landmasses. It was filled with marine life, and its floor slowly collected layers of sediment, one on top of another, over an incredibly long period of time.

At the surface, everything seemed calm and stable. But deep beneath the ocean floor, the Earth was constantly in motion, even though the movement was so slow it would have been impossible to notice in a human lifetime.

Over time, that slow movement began to change everything.

When Landmasses Collide

One of the largest landmasses in the region, what we now know as the Arabian Peninsula, began to drift slowly northward.

It did not happen quickly. In fact, it moved at a pace of just a few centimetres each year, roughly the same speed that human fingernails grow.

But even though the movement was slow, it never stopped. Year after year, century after century, the land kept moving.

Eventually, it began to collide with the larger Eurasian landmass.

When two massive pieces of the Earth’s crust come together like this, something remarkable happens. The land does not simply stop. Instead, it begins to change shape under pressure.

Rock layers fold and bend. Some areas are pushed upward. Others are forced downward. Over long periods of time, this pressure creates mountain ranges and reshapes entire landscapes.

This is the process that slowly closed the ancient ocean that once existed here. As the landmasses continued to push against each other, the ocean gradually disappeared.

What remains today are fragments of that ancient world, preserved in the rocks and landscapes we can still see around the Strait of Hormuz.

A Piece Of The Ocean On Land

One of the most fascinating things about this region is that it holds physical evidence of that ancient ocean, even though the ocean itself no longer exists.

In several places around the Strait of Hormuz, rocks that were once part of the deep ocean floor have been pushed up onto land.

These rocks were not originally formed on mountains. They were formed at the bottom of the sea, under enormous pressure and over millions of years.

Through tectonic movement, they were gradually lifted upward, exposing them to the surface where they can now be studied directly.

For scientists, this is extremely valuable because it allows them to examine parts of the Earth that are usually hidden far beneath the ocean.

It is almost like being able to walk across an ancient ocean floor that has been frozen in time and lifted into view.

A Land Still Changing

Even though the major collision between landmasses began millions of years ago, the process has not completely stopped.

The Earth in this region is still under pressure, and that pressure is released in different ways over time.

One of those ways is through earthquakes, which are relatively common in surrounding areas.

Most of these are small and go unnoticed, but they are a reminder that the ground beneath the Strait of Hormuz is still active and still evolving.

The mountains continue to rise slowly, and the landscape continues to change, even if the changes are not immediately visible to the human eye.

In geological terms, this region is still under construction.

It has not finished its story.

The Strait Of Hormuz Today

Today, the Strait of Hormuz has taken on a completely different role in the modern world.

It has become one of the most important maritime routes on the planet, connecting energy-producing regions with global markets.

Large oil tankers and cargo ships pass through this narrow passage every day, carrying resources that are essential to economies around the world.

Because the Strait is so narrow, it functions as a critical chokepoint. This means that even small disruptions can have large effects far beyond the region itself.

For this reason, the Strait is often in global focus, not only for its geography but also for its economic and strategic importance.

However, beneath this modern role lies a much older story that continues to shape the region in ways that are still visible today.

A Story Written In The Land

 For many people around the world, the Strait of Hormuz is known mainly as a shipping route, a place where global trade passes through a narrow stretch of water.

But when we look deeper, the story becomes much larger than that.

This is a place where ancient oceans once existed and later disappeared. A place where continents slowly collided, shaping mountains and coastlines over millions of years. A place where fragments of the Earth’s deep past are still visible on the surface today.

The Strait of Hormuz is not just a passage for ships. It is also a passage through time, where the history of the Earth is written directly into the landscape.

And even today, that story is still unfolding.

For Environmental Commendations And Concerns:

Follow Us On Kingschat: Ln247 And Space.Comln247

Also follow us on all social media platforms.

You can also send A Mail/Picture/Video To: Info2@Ln247.News

Always remember that cleanliness is next to godliness, therefore be clean in thoughts, in words and in deeds.

Gimalo-Angel Olowogoke, signing out.

Trump Considers Early Release Of US-Iran Peace Deal – Vance

0

US President Donald Trump may release details of the preliminary peace agreement between the United States and Iran before its official signing on Friday, according to Vice President JD Vance.

The development comes after Trump declared that the agreement had already been signed, while senior US officials began revealing key aspects of the framework aimed at ending months of conflict between both countries.

Speaking in multiple media interviews, Vance described the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) as a brief and broad framework document.

According to him, the agreement is “about a page and a half” long and remains “a very general” document, with many of the finer details expected to be addressed during subsequent negotiations.

Senior US officials also disclosed that the Strait of Hormuz is expected to reopen on Friday, the same day the agreement is scheduled to be formally signed in Geneva, Switzerland.

Iran’s Foreign Minister, Seyed Abbas Araghchi, confirmed that a new round of negotiations focused on securing a final peace agreement with the United States would begin in Switzerland on Friday.

The announcement comes as Trump attends the G7 Summit in France, where Iran is expected to feature prominently in discussions. Leaders from Egypt, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates are also expected to participate in a special session dedicated to the situation.

During talks with French President Emmanuel Macron on Monday, Trump expressed confidence that the process was already complete.

“I am very happy to say it’s signed, the deal is all signed,” he said, referring to the preliminary agreement.

US officials stated that the document had been electronically signed by Trump, Vance, and Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.

They added that technical negotiations on Iran’s nuclear programme are expected to begin this week, while sanctions relief and the release of Iranian assets will depend on Tehran fulfilling its commitments under the agreement.

Vance told NBC News that international nuclear inspectors would be permitted to return to Iran as part of the arrangement.

“One of the core parts of the agreement is that the [International Atomic Energy Agency] and the United States are going to help Iran destroy the highly enriched stockpile — and that’s something that’s spelled out very clearly.”

While Trump previously suggested that the details of the agreement would be published shortly after Friday’s signing ceremony, Vance indicated that the president could choose to release the document earlier.

Speaking to Fox News, Vance said Trump was considering making the agreement public before Friday.

He also explained to CNN that the memorandum serves as a framework for future negotiations.

“On a number of issues, we are going to have to figure this stuff out during the technical negotiation phase, but what the MOU does is set up a framework whereby the Iranians get the benefits of the bargain by meeting their obligations under the bargain,” he said.

According to Vance, the opening section of the document requires Iran to commit itself to regional peace and stability.

“In paragraph one,” he said, Iran agrees to “regional peace and stability,” which includes ending support for what he described as “terrorist organisations.”

“Most importantly, they’re going to have a verifiable commitment to not building a nuclear weapon,” Vance added.

The agreement has also attracted international attention due to its implications for global energy security. Britain and France have previously supported plans for a defensive mission aimed at protecting commercial vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump, however, suggested that the United States may not require extensive assistance in safeguarding the strategic waterway.

“I don’t think we’ll need much help,” he said, while adding that he did not think it was “a bad idea to have a ship or two” from allied countries stationed there.

Under the terms announced so far, the agreement extends an existing ceasefire by another 60 days, during which both sides will negotiate a comprehensive and permanent settlement.

The breakthrough was first announced by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, whose country played a mediation role in the negotiations.

According to Sharif, the deal provides for “the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.”

US officials clarified, however, that while Lebanon is covered by the ceasefire arrangement, Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanese territory is not a condition of the agreement. They stressed that Israel would continue to retain the right to defend itself.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reiterated that position on Monday, saying Israeli troops would remain in designated security zones across Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza for as long as necessary.

He also maintained that Iran would never be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons, regardless of whether a final agreement is reached.

Netanyahu’s comments followed reports from Lebanese media of a deadly Israeli strike on a vehicle in southern Lebanon — the first reported attack since the peace agreement was announced.

Hezbollah later claimed responsibility for launching missiles and drones at Israeli forces in response. The Israel Defense Forces subsequently confirmed that four people were killed in strikes it said targeted militants.

Reacting to the incident, Araghchi warned that Iran would regard any future Israeli attacks on Lebanon, or continued Israeli military presence in Lebanese territory, as a violation of the interim agreement.

“In our view, the two parties to this memorandum are the US and Israel on one side, and Iran and Hezbollah on the other,” he said.

As negotiations move toward Friday’s formal signing, attention remains focused on unresolved issues surrounding Iran’s nuclear programme, regional security arrangements, sanctions relief, and the long-term durability of the peace framework.

Court Upholds Arrest Warrant Against Sadiya Farouq In Fraud Trial

0

A Federal Capital Territory High Court in Apo, Abuja, has rejected an application by former Minister of Humanitarian Affairs, Sadiya Umar Farouq, seeking to overturn a bench warrant previously issued for her arrest.

Delivering his ruling on Monday, Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie held that the former minister failed to provide a convincing explanation for her repeated absence from court in a criminal case brought against her by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

The judge stressed that defendants in criminal matters are expected to appear before the court unless there are legitimate and verifiable reasons for their absence, noting that the law empowers courts to issue arrest warrants when such obligations are disregarded.

Farouq is standing trial alongside two other defendants over allegations bordering on criminal conspiracy, abuse of office, and the alleged diversion of public funds totaling $1.3 million and ₦746.7 million.

The EFCC argued that the former minister had no justifiable reason for failing to appear in court. The court also dismissed medical claims presented on her behalf, including arthritis and heart-related health concerns, ruling that they were insufficient grounds for her non-appearance.

Justice Onwuegbuzie observed that the medical evidence submitted did not adequately demonstrate why Farouq was unable to attend the proceedings, adding that criminal trials must be conducted according to established legal procedures and cannot be delayed by unsupported claims.

Counsel to the prosecution, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), welcomed the ruling and urged the court to enforce an undertaking allegedly made by the defendant’s lead counsel to ensure her appearance for arraignment.

Jacobs further maintained that prolonged delays in the matter were unacceptable and called on the court to utilize its legal powers to compel compliance with its directives.

In response, defence counsel requested that senior lawyers involved in the matter be given the opportunity to personally address the court regarding issues surrounding the alleged undertaking.

The request was granted by the court, and the matter was subsequently adjourned until July 2, 2026, for arraignment.

The case remains ongoing as the EFCC continues its prosecution of the former minister over allegations of financial misconduct and the diversion of public funds.

Court Nullifies CAC’s Deregistration Of National Youth Council Of Nigeria

0

A Federal High Court in Abuja has set aside the Corporate Affairs Commission’s (CAC) decision to withdraw the registration of the National Youth Council of Nigeria (NYCN).

The court also invalidated the commission’s move to establish an interim management committee to oversee the affairs of the youth organisation.

Delivering judgment, Justice Binta Nyako held that the CAC acted beyond its powers by withdrawing the council’s registration and altering its leadership structure while disputes relating to the organisation were still pending before appellate courts.

The ruling followed a suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2142/2025, filed by the Incorporated Trustees of the NYCN and Ambassador Sukubo Sara-Igbe Sukubo, who serves as the council’s President and Secretary of its Board of Trustees (BoT).

The defendants in the matter were the Registrar-General of the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), the CAC, the Minister of Youth Development, and the Federal Ministry of Youth Development.

In the judgment delivered on June 5, Justice Nyako dismissed preliminary objections raised by the defendants challenging the competence of the suit and ruled that the actions taken against the organisation were unlawful.

A Certified True Copy (CTC) of the judgment was obtained by The Nation.

The judge stated:

“Having considered the processes filed by the parties, I am of the view that the central issue is not whether the first and second defendants (the RG-CAC and CAC) possess regulatory powers over incorporated trustees because they undoubtedly do.

“The real question is whether those powers extend to the wholesale displacement of the existing leadership of the first claimant (NYCN) in the peculiar circumstances of this case.

“The affidavit evidence before this court reveals that disputes relating to the trusteeship, leadership structure and administration of the first claimant have been the subject of multiple litigations before courts of competent jurisdiction.

“It is trite that where the determination of rights is already before a court, an administrative body must exercise caution so as not to assume the role of the court.”

Justice Nyako acknowledged that the powers granted to the CAC under the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) are regulatory in nature and that the commission is legally empowered to supervise incorporated trustees.

However, she stressed that such powers must not be exercised in a way that effectively determines issues that are already awaiting judicial resolution.

She said:

“The commission may investigate, it may supervise compliance with statutory requirements. It may make inquiries into the affairs of an association.

“What it cannot do is assume the role of the court by effectively deciding who should govern the association while the issue remains the subject of pending litigation.

“The evidence before this court shows that the defendants went beyond investigation. They purportedly withdrew the certificate of the first claimant and proceeded to constitute an interim management committee to assume control of the organisation.

“Whatever nomenclature is used, the practical consequence of that decision was to displace the existing leadership structure and install another authority in its place.

“In my view, such action was premature. It altered the status quo in a dispute that was already before the courts and had the tendency of rendering pending proceedings nugatory.

“The law does not permit a party, directly or indirectly, to achieve administratively what remains unresolved judicially.

“However, while I decline to make a general pronouncement declaring Sections 839 and 851 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act unconstitutional, the actions taken pursuant to those provisions in the peculiar facts of this case were unlawful and cannot stand.

“The court is satisfied that the intervention complained of exceeded what was reasonably necessary to achieve regulatory oversight and encroached on matters properly reserved for judicial determination. Parties are thus advised to await the outcome of the appeal.

“I consequently hold that, while the first and second defendants possess statutory oversight powers over incorporated trustees, the withdrawal of recognition and the constitution of an interim management committee in the circumstances of this case were premature and cannot be sustained.

“Parties are hereby directed to maintain the position existing before the intervention complained of, pending the determination of the disputes currently before the appellate courts.”

The ruling effectively restores the status quo that existed before the CAC’s intervention and directs all parties to await the outcome of ongoing appeals concerning the leadership and administration of the National Youth Council of Nigeria.

Dangote Refinery Slashes Petrol Price By ₦75 Per Litre

0

The Dangote Petroleum Refinery has reduced the gantry price of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), commonly known as petrol, by ₦75 per litre, bringing the price down from ₦1,250 to ₦1,175 per litre.

In a notice issued to fuel marketers on Monday, the refinery attributed the price adjustment to the recent easing of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, which had previously driven global energy prices upward.

The refinery also announced a downward review of its coastal price per metric tonne, reducing it from ₦1,595,790 to ₦1,495,215. According to the notice, the new pricing structure takes effect from midnight on June 16, 2026, and all pending gantry transactions will be adjusted to reflect the revised rates.

Industry analysts say the move mirrors the broader decline in global crude oil prices following reports of reduced tensions in the Middle East and renewed diplomatic efforts surrounding key international shipping routes.

During the period of heightened conflict, crude oil prices rose sharply, leading to increased fuel costs in several countries, including Nigeria. Petrol prices surged significantly, while diesel and aviation fuel also experienced substantial price hikes.

With crude oil prices now trending downward, stakeholders in Nigeria’s downstream petroleum sector are optimistic that consumers could see further reductions in fuel prices in the coming days, provided global market conditions remain stable.

Market observers also believe that continued declines in international crude prices may create room for additional petrol price cuts. However, refiners have noted that existing inventories purchased at higher costs could delay immediate reductions at filling stations across the country.

Emeka Ike Sues INEC, Wike’s Aide Over Alleged Voter Data Breach

0

Nollywood actor Emeka Ike has filed a lawsuit against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and Lere Olayinka over an alleged breach of his privacy rights.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1272/2026, was filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja on June 15 after claims emerged that his personal voter registration information was accessed and published without authorization.

According to court filings, the dispute arose after Olayinka shared screenshots on X (formerly Twitter) containing details of Ike’s voter registration transfer from Imo State to the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The post, which allegedly originated from a restricted INEC platform, questioned the actor’s eligibility to participate in political activities within Abuja.

The publication reportedly sparked widespread reactions online, with concerns raised over the alleged exposure of confidential voter information. Although INEC denied experiencing a major system breach, the commission reportedly acknowledged that the disclosure stemmed from the misuse of legitimate internal access credentials.

In the suit, Ike argued that the release of his personal data without his approval constituted a violation of his constitutional right to privacy, as well as protections provided under the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 and relevant international human rights frameworks.

The actor is asking the court to declare both INEC and Olayinka responsible for the alleged breach, order the removal of the published information, and compel the defendants to issue a public apology across social media platforms and national newspapers.

He is also seeking ₦10 billion in damages, describing the incident as a serious infringement on his fundamental rights.

The legal battle is expected to draw significant attention as it could become a major test of Nigeria’s growing data protection regime and the obligations of public institutions to safeguard citizens’ personal information.

ADC Rejects Court-Ordered Deregistration, Alleges Attempt To Weaken Opposition

0

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has rejected a Federal High Court ruling directing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the party and four others, describing the judgment as a threat to Nigeria’s democracy and an attempt to weaken opposition politics.

Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday ordered INEC to deregister the ADC, Accord Party, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance, and Zenith Labour Party over alleged failure to meet constitutional and electoral requirements stipulated under Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the Electoral Act 2022.

The ruling followed a suit filed by the National Forum of Former Legislators, which argued that INEC was constitutionally required to deregister political parties that failed to achieve specified electoral performance benchmarks. These include securing at least 25 per cent of votes in a state during a presidential election or winning at least one elective office.

Reacting in a statement posted on X and signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, the ADC described the judgment as unconstitutional and alarming.

“The African Democratic Congress (ADC) wishes to warn, in the strongest possible terms, against any attempt to use the judiciary as an instrument to undermine democracy and plunge Nigeria into a major political crisis.

“We are deeply alarmed by the judgment reportedly delivered by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, in a case filed by the so-called National Forum of Former Legislators seeking the de-registration of the ADC and four other political parties. This judgment stands in direct conflict with constitutional principles and all known judicial processes and procedures.”

The party argued that the ruling contradicted existing legal precedents and positions previously taken by INEC regarding the deregistration of political parties.

According to the ADC, INEC had defended the party’s status before the court, maintaining that it remained fully compliant with constitutional and statutory requirements governing political parties in Nigeria.

The party said the electoral commission informed the court that the ADC had neither violated any registration conditions nor failed to meet any constitutionally recognised electoral threshold that would warrant deregistration.

It further claimed that INEC had maintained that deregistration could only be based on legally recognised grounds and not influenced by political pressure or vested interests.

Beyond challenging the substance of the judgment, the ADC also questioned the procedure that led to the ruling. The party alleged that the Federal High Court proceeded with the matter despite a Court of Appeal order issued on May 22, 2026, directing that proceedings be stayed.

According to the ADC, the development amounted to a disregard for judicial hierarchy and established legal processes.

“We are therefore left in no doubt that this latest development is a continuation of the ruling party’s persistent efforts to undermine the opposition, especially the ADC,” the statement said.

The party also expressed concern over the timing of the judgment, noting that it came shortly after the conclusion of its party primaries and the commencement of preparations for the 2027 general elections.

The ADC warned that removing a major opposition platform through what it described as judicial manipulation could destabilise the democratic process.

“Any attempt to eliminate the country’s major opposition party through judicial manoeuvring… is a direct invitation to anarchy,” the party stated.

Describing the ruling as “reckless, provocative, and even incendiary,” the ADC argued that attempts to use state institutions to limit political competition undermine the foundations of democracy.

The party maintained that the matter had moved beyond party registration and now raises broader concerns about whether Nigerians will have genuine political alternatives in the 2027 elections.

“Let it be clearly stated: the ADC will not stand by while the democratic rights of millions of Nigerians are threatened. We reject any and all attempts to intimidate, suppress, deregister, or politically extinguish our party and other opposition parties through means that offend both the spirit and the letter of the Constitution.”

Reaffirming its commitment to the rule of law, the party said it would challenge the judgment through all available legal and constitutional channels. It also pledged to engage democratic stakeholders while continuing to defend the interests of its members, supporters, and candidates.

The ADC further alleged that the ruling forms part of a broader strategy aimed at weakening opposition parties ahead of the next election cycle.

“Make no mistake, this is another act of desperation by the ruling party and the government to hand President Tinubu a second term without contest. This will not work,” it said.

The party warned that any attempt to establish what it described as a “civilian dictatorship” could have serious implications for national stability, adding that those responsible should be held accountable for any resulting tensions.

It also disclosed plans to petition the National Judicial Council (NJC), accusing the trial judge of conduct capable of bringing the judiciary into disrepute.

While urging members, supporters, and coalition partners to remain calm and law-abiding, the ADC encouraged them to stay vigilant and committed to the democratic process.

The party insisted that, “Whatever it takes, the ADC will be on the ballot so long as the 2027 election is to hold.”

The ADC and several opposition parties have repeatedly accused President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the ruling All Progressives Congress of attempting to dominate Nigeria’s political landscape and steer the country toward a one-party system.

However, both the President and the APC have consistently rejected those allegations, maintaining that a strong and credible opposition remains vital to Nigeria’s democratic development.

Wife Of Late Major General Rabe Regains Freedom After Weeks In Captivity

0

Hajiya Amina Abubakar, the widow of late Major General Abubakar Rabe, has reportedly regained her freedom after spending more than two weeks in captivity.

She was kidnapped alongside her husband on May 30, 2026, when their vehicle was ambushed along the Marabar Musawa–Kafinsoli Road in Matazu Local Government Area of Katsina State while they were travelling to attend a wedding ceremony.

A week after their abduction, the couple appeared in a video released by their captors, who outlined conditions for their release.

In the four-minute, two-second video that circulated on social media, the widow relayed the abductors’ demand for the release of three individuals identified as Sani, Aminu, and Nasiru.

According to her, two of the individuals were arrested in Jikamshi, while the third was apprehended in Kano.

She also appealed to the Katsina State Government and leaders across five local government areas to intervene and meet the demands of the kidnappers in order to secure their freedom.

However, hopes of a joint release were dashed after news emerged on Saturday that the retired military officer had died while in captivity, while his wife remained in the custody of the abductors.

Reports indicate that on Monday, security forces launched an operation against the kidnappers and engaged them in a gun battle, leading to the release of the widow.

As of the time of filing this report, details surrounding her rescue and the circumstances of her release remained unclear.

Last week, a notorious bandit leader, Kachalla Muhammad, claimed he had initially intended to release the widow but later changed his mind because he did not want security agencies to take credit for her freedom.

In an audio message, the bandit kingpin explained that the heavy deployment of security personnel in the area forced him to suspend the planned release.

The bandit leader stated that he had earlier indicated a willingness to free the retired general’s wife but reversed the decision due to ongoing security operations.

“I had promised the General that I would release his wife, but the deployment of security personnel in the area made me change my mind.”

Kachalla also expressed displeasure over the arrest of individuals he claimed were associated with his group, warning that the arrests had further complicated any prospects for dialogue.

The development comes days after the death of the retired general in captivity, a tragedy that sparked widespread grief and renewed concerns over the worsening security situation in parts of northern Nigeria.